A Tale of Two Toasters
Revolution Cooking's Toaster. revcook.com

A Tale of Two Toasters

Acme Toaster Company was founded in 1924 and has held a position among the top three toaster manufacturers since the close of World War II. It has been selling the Acme Toaster for more than half a century, tweaking the industrial design ever few years to accommodate changing consumer tastes. The company spends approximately one hundred thousand dollars per year on surveys, focus groups, and usability tests to ensure its products are keeping pace with market demands.

UltraKitchen LLC is a start-up firm that hopes to reinvigorate the small appliance market by modernizing utilitarian designs with Silicon Valley technology. The blueprint for its flagship product, the UltraToaster, was conceived after two hours of research, conducted in a conference room. After debating what consumers want in a toaster (the consensus was toast), the design team set out to build a product that would deliver perfect results every time, with a minimum of irritation and effort. To develop the initial design and functional spec for the UltraToaster, the company spent $34 on pizza and soft drinks.

The Acme Toaster has standard toaster features: a knob that sets the toasting time (brownness) in a range from 1 to 10, and a lever that raises and lowers the bread and turns the toasting elements on and off. Usability tests have shown that users routinely undertoast or overtoast their food items. The Acme Toaster design team has determined that toasting failures result from the user’s inadequate knowledge of toaster mechanics and by their failure to appreciate mutual reciprocities that exist between browning level, bread density, and moisture content – even though all factors are discussed at length in the manual. Because of the users’ failure to learn to use the toaster correctly, most users are forced to visually monitor toasting progress and manually eject the food item when it has reached the desired brownness (“serves them right,” the project manager says). The toaster generates one error message – a loud, annoying buzzing sound that occurs when the user foolishly pushes down the lever to extend the toasting time without first turning the knob to increase the brownness level.

The UltraToaster has rewritten the decades-old rules of toaster behavior. It has no brownness knob and no lever; instead it has a color LCD touch-screen display on one side of the machine. The user simply drops the bread, bagel, or pastry into the slot. The toaster detects the type of food item just inserted, and the LCD displays a series of pictures of that item in various states of brownness. The user simply touches the picture that best matches the desired brownness level, and the toaster begins to toast. The user is now free to make the rest of her breakfast; however, many users prefer to stay and watch the LCD’s live picture of the toasting process, along with a progress bar displaying the countdown to toast. When the toaster is finished toasting, it chimes pleasantly, and keeps the toast warm inside the unit until the user returns. One touch on the LCD display raises the toast to where the user can easily grasp it.

The Acme Toaster costs $29.99 and earns a profit of 8%. The UltraToaster costs $129.99 and enjoys a profit of 30%. Acme Toaster has an installed base numbering in the millions. The UltraToaster is UltraKitchen’s first product and has no installed base.

Question: Given the evolution of technology, five years from now, which product will be obsolete?

Joel Cranford

Sr. Product Owner, Sr. Product Designer, UX Researcher with 15+ Years Experience in Agile/Scrum Business Analysis, Quantitative and Qualitative User Research, Prototyping, Agile, SaaS / Enterprise/ Mobile UX

1 年

Great question! Here's how I might approach this... 1. Obsolescence doesn't always equate to extinction. 2. Consumers primarily buy the product they *understand* which translates into familiarity. 3. Each product's SRP can be mitigated with discounts, especially new to market items like the UltraToaster. If I'm Acme, I'm likely to have sales figures and projections. Even a dysfunctional product marketing effort should see at least some writing on the wall of lower sales forecasts (even if it's late in the game). How they react to it is key, e.g., "Sales are down: We MUST make our instruction booklet more detailed!" won't help. > They need to simplify the product so that good outcomes are more predictable. If I'm UltraKitchen, I'm eager to see market share rise, especially year-over-year increases in retail placement. Given their margin, that may give them more room for initial discounts or value-added specials (e.g., "Order today and get a free toaster cover.") > They need to simplify the purchase so that market adoption is more predictable. Two very different strategies, but each requires more simplicity - which requires engaging their consumers. Thus, is it the product that becomes obsolete - or the thinking behind them?

Very well written case study John, loved the story telling. I'd go with the older one. the second looks like a repeat of Juicero (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/01/juicero-silicon-valley-shutting-down)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Bowie的更多文章

  • Revolutionary Redesign Versus the Agile Jigsaw Puzzle

    Revolutionary Redesign Versus the Agile Jigsaw Puzzle

    Agile works fine when making incremental improvements to an existing product. But when you’re starting design on a…

    2 条评论
  • The Art of Unthinking and the Take-Away Method

    The Art of Unthinking and the Take-Away Method

    The next volume in the Navigating the Politics of UX series is called Revolutionary Redesign. In it, I describe the…

    1 条评论
  • A UX New Year's Resolution

    A UX New Year's Resolution

    Resolved: I will no longer work in the dark. Across all the definitions of our profession over the past eighty years:…

    2 条评论
  • Conversations with Technology

    Conversations with Technology

    I had the privilege of giving a talk last month at the World Usability Congress in Graz, Austria. It continues to be…

    7 条评论
  • Q&A with the Product Team

    Q&A with the Product Team

    Midway through the kickoff meeting, after the product manager has finished her presentation, you interrupt the…

    3 条评论
  • The Wall

    The Wall

    Many of you may know that I'm writing Volume 2 of Navigating the Politics of UX with a target publication date in…

    2 条评论
  • Inputs and Outputs

    Inputs and Outputs

    Over the past several years, the UX community has developed dozens of activities designed to engage the organization in…

    1 条评论
  • The Quintessence of UX

    The Quintessence of UX

    In October of this year (2024), I will publish my last book about the politics and practice of user experience…

  • Inspiration

    Inspiration

    Only a brief newsletter this month. I'm deep into the writing of Navigating the Politics of UX, Volume 2: Operations…

  • What Are We Designing?

    What Are We Designing?

    The answer seems obvious. We design products and services, right? After decomposing outcomes into epics and then into…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了