A Tale of Two Nations: An Exercise in Critical Thought

Thousands of Mexicans have begun to migrate en masse to the Mandate United States, a country currently governed by the United Nations. These individuals aspire for greater autonomy over their ethnic group's destiny, possibly aiming for national sovereignty. However, their immediate desire is to coexist peacefully, far from the oppression and violence they endured in the South. They are also motivated by a historical claim, given that their ancestors inhabited these lands well before the founding of America.

As years turn into decades, the Mexican community becomes a fundamental part of American society. This demographic shift unsettles numerous white American elitists, who view the growing Mexican population with apprehension and fear. Concerned about the preservation of a white-dominated America, these elitists initiate a campaign of harassment against Mexican families and businesses, which escalates into violence and murder. In response, Mexicans begin to defend themselves, leading to widespread conflict across the country.

Eventually, the UN intervenes. White American elitists demand a return to the status quo, insisting on the expulsion of the Mexican population. In contrast, Mexicans advocate for peaceful coexistence and the right to share the land, hinting at the possibility of discussing their own nation in the future, yet stressing their current non-subversive intentions.

The elitists, however, refuse to accept the demographic changes, proclaiming a desire for an ethnically pure land. The UN proposes a compromise to address the Mexicans' safety needs while acknowledging the elitists' demands for cultural purity, aiming to maintain peace at least temporarily.

Despite this, the elitists reject UN intervention, insisting on resolving the matter independently, which leads to further violence against both the UN and the Mexicans. The UN's stance hardens, refusing to permit the eradication of the Mexican community for the benefit of a racist and elitist agenda nor dominance over such a large oil rich region leading to a new singular superpower who sees themselves as ethnically and religiously superior to all people groups outside their own.

It recognizes that, although not all white Americans support the extremists, their silence allows the elitists to dominate the narrative and political agenda.

Ultimately, the Mexicans overcome the elitists and secure new territories, facing a pivotal decision about their future. They can either hold what they fought for and establish a new nation or surrender it and seek reconciliation by placing the land and their fates back in the hands of the elitists who still want them all dead.

The UN supports their inevitable decision, endorsing the right to self-determination.

Does the Mexican community's defense against aggression render them oppressors?

When later new generations of white elitists engage in violent attempts to reclaim land and eliminate the Mexican presence, and the these new generations of Mexicans resist, is that resistance oppressive?

Furthermore, when distant observers romantically support the militarily inferior white elitists under the guise of opposing oppression and genocide while at the same time chanting to Mexicans, "From the Pacific to the Atlantic!", does that genuinely align with their claimed anti-oppression and anti-genocide principles?