Takt Time

Takt Time

https://www.hmoperationsmanagement.com/post/takt-time

“Takt” is a German word. Probably through Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in the Nagoya plant, located within Taiichi Ohno's commute to his college and life. However, when implemented inside the Toyota Production System, it represents the customer demand in time. There is this saying that time is a shadow of motion. And motions form the work. Therefore, we can convert work into time and balance the work to customer demand in time. Whenever there is a change in the demand, we should change the work balance. And, takt time played an important role.


The calculation is favored since it is simple. Yet, some have started to fake the takt time.


One of such is discounted “available time.” I have run into a place where they say the OEE should be 80%, so they multiply discounted available time by 20%. Some have excluded some time since they are struggling with start-ups. These are typical in places where they think that calculations are problem-solving without looking into the root causes. For them, takt time is another thing to calculate disrespecting the philosophy.

Another fake is the inflated demand. I encountered situations where sales, planning, engineering, and operations inflated demand. Each function might think they have only inflated “few” percentages, like 20%, but the total gap is enormous. Each function might think they have done their work, but the cost will be extremely high. It’s common to find such situations inside broken and poorly coordinated organizations.


These fake activities raise another question. Should we have different takt times inside a plant? In theory, creating a flow and rebalancing is possible when more processes have the same takt time. That should be the ideal. But it is challenging. However, should we have the same available time inside a plant? This should be possible (some technologies will not allow the same takt time.). Generally, those processes with different available times should be highlighted from the design stages. Differences in available time require inventories to adjust, which requires careful planning. Managers should be aware that there aren’t many takt time calculations. Most of my coaches will hear a takt time and automatically get a rough annual volume. That’s because the available time is almost fixed, and there are no other variables than volume.


What is more critical about takt time beyond its number or calculation is that there is an action at every takt time.


The obvious action is the action of the operators. Every takt time, the operator will start its standardized work. The standardized work should be balanced toward takt time. Every operator should start and stop at the same time. The standardized work will use components and release the Kanban. If not completed, the Andon must be pulled.

This Andon is the critical connection between the operator and the team leader. At every takt time, the team leader must ensure that no one within the team is delayed. If any, the team leader must go and help. This means that the processes the team leaders are responsible for must be visible to each other. If there are blind spots, the team leader cannot see the struggling process.

Another important thing is that the process needs to be “help-able.” There are many situations where the team leader does come to help. Yet, while the team leader helps, the operator watches. Although sometimes it is vital to see the correct method, it is also questionable. Yes, it is like a substitution in sports where you exchange a fresh player. But there’s no guarantee that the process will catch up. Instead, the operator and the team leader should become double manpower to boost performance temporarily. This way, the team can catch up to takt time.


The action of an organization to takt time doesn’t end at the team leader level. The higher management level should know operators should follow the standardized work at takt time. This looks like an orchestra; the music starts and ends when the conductor swings the takt stick (I heard this was why Toyota liked the word Takt.). They should also know that the team leaders should be helping at every takt time. If the team leaders are pulled frequently, then the higher level (Group leader) should come and help. Such frequent or significant problems should be quickly escalated so that higher managers can take proper action. The senior management should know that takt time is like the heartbeat of animals. Something should happen at every heartbeat. If not, then your organization is dead.


Once again, takt time is not just a calculation. It’s not data collection frequency. It is not just for the operators. It’s the heartbeat of actions among the organization that keeps them alive.

Ossama Ismail

#24'000# Followers │ In-house Business Consultant & Quality Instructor Greater Cairo Foundries (GCF)co. │Quality , Environment , OHS , Food safety , Lean Manufacturing : Instructor

1 周

Many thanks for sharing

Ricardo Perez-Torres

Manufacturing Operations & SCM Executive

9 个月

Great post! I remember working with you around 2005~2006, led and guided by Oba Sensei (Hajime), and we applied a concept of balancing by nature of elements, where the starting point (naturally) was the takt time, and we had the opportunity to establish a support strategy (line leaders), and a 25% optimization in just 48 hours. It has been one of my greatest and most comforting experiences at TPS Dojo, since our collaborators on the assembly line felt highly motivated by the result and the changes in their operations.

Lani Watson

President Sustainable Lean Advantage

12 个月

As a possible origin, Takt is a noun in German. Entymology: German, time in music, measure, from Latin tactus touch, sense of touch. Toyota has interpreted this measure or touch in terms of one aspect of Customer Satisfaction representing time/demand.

回复
Al Smith

Retired / Management Consulting

12 个月

Am I the only one who has observed the required OT in Toyota Asy. plants when the required production number for that shift was not met?

回复
Olivier Larue

Leadership │ Operation strategy │ Operation design │Business Transformation | Operation management │ Financial performance │ Workforce development │ Economic and environmental stewardship.

1 年

Great post and comments. Yes, takt time is the point of reference—or datum (maybe I should say data)—from which to calculate the labor, material, and capital necessary to meet demand Just-in-Time. Across all departments, whether they directly or indirectly resource the operation. We use takt time to design and subsequently allocate only the resources necessary to produce what the customer wants. Instead of using takt time, one option widely practiced in the mass production system, is to vary the speed of work and the amount of time a production line works. But varying work speeds and work times along the value stream/supply chain changes the capacity between processes. It thus compromises the continuous flow requirement for a single pace of production, equal to the pace of sales. It prevents everyone from using a single point of reference to consistently design, manage, and improve the operation. ? Also, for some reason in US Toyota plants, the discounted takt time Hide is referring to, is called “actual takt time”. Maybe a direct translation from Japanese. Sometime the production manager would “discreetly” try to accelerate the line speed to make up for down time. This of course is not allowed and very frowned upon.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了