Tackling AI Coding Hallucinations

In today’s rapidly evolving landscape of software development, AI has become an indispensable ally. However, its journey from a supportive tool to a source of confusion was starkly illustrated in my recent encounter with AI-generated code. This story begins with an attempt to leverage ChatGPT O1 for a seemingly simple task in FileMaker, shedding light on the broader implications of AI hallucinations in coding.

My Coding Encounter with AI

The task was to automate line spacing adjustments in a letter template using up and down buttons within FileMaker Pro. The idea was straightforward: users could click these buttons to increase or decrease the space between lines, enhancing readability or fitting more content into the designated space. I turned to ChatGPT O1, expecting a swift and accurate solution. The AI-generated script initially appeared promising, suggesting the use of a function named “Set LayoutObjectAttribute” to modify the line spacing. The logic was sound; the function seemed to fit perfectly into the solution. However, upon writing the script in Filemaker, I encountered a significant problem—FileMaker had no such function. The actual Filemaker function, “Get LayoutObjectAttribute,” which, despite sharing a similar name, serves to retrieve, not set, attributes of layout objects. A seasoned Filemaker developer would have caught this coding error immediately.

The Nature of AI Hallucinations

This experience illuminated a significant issue in AI-assisted code generation: the phenomenon known as “AI hallucination.” Here, the AI, in its attempt to predict the next logical piece of code, introduced a function that did not exist, possibly due to a single misplaced character in its training data or logic. This error, though seemingly small, underscores a broader, more profound challenge within AI-driven development environments.

The Implications of AI Hallucinations

The implications of such AI hallucinations are multifaceted. Firstly, there are security risks to consider. If a developer implements a non-existent package or function that AI suggests without verifying its existence, it can lead to potential security vulnerabilities. Malicious actors could exploit this vulnerability by creating packages with hallucinated names and embedding harmful code within them, which could then be inadvertently included in projects.

Productivity and trust are also affected. While AI assistance might initially save time, each hallucination requires manual verification, slowing down the development process and potentially leading to skepticism about AI’s reliability.

The educational impact is another major problem. For beginners or people learning new systems, AI might introduce notions or functionalities that do not exist, resulting in confusion and misinformation. This could have a long-term impact on someone’s coding journey by introducing erroneous habits or knowledge. Furthermore, dealing with code that contains non-existent functions makes maintenance and debugging more difficult, diverting the focus away from logical problems and toward existential ones.

Finally, in industries where compliance with specific standards or rules is critical, AI hallucinations may result in non-compliant software solutions, incurring legal and tragic consequences.

Mitigating AI Hallucinations

To address this issue, several strategies can be implemented, which may include:

Verification and Testing: No matter how confident an AI seems, every piece of suggested code should be cross-checked against official documentation.

Education and Awareness: Developers must be educated about AI’s limitations, especially its propensity for hallucinations. This awareness leads to better scrutiny.

AI Training Data Quality: Ensuring the training datasets are accurate and updating them regularly to reflect changes in programming languages or software is vital.

Community and Feedback: Leveraging community feedback can help in updating AI models to reduce hallucinations. When developers report discrepancies, AI systems can learn from these mistakes.

Conclusion

While AI technologies like ChatGPT O1 continue to change the way we code, the occurrence with “Set LayoutObjectAttribute” serves as a cautionary tale. While AI can expedite development, it still necessitates a vigilant human touch to ensure software accuracy, security, and trustworthiness. As we integrate more AI into our development techniques, we must adapt our approaches to not only utilize AI but also critically evaluate its outputs, ensuring that the code we write today can endure time and scrutiny.

Check out my book “Demystifying AI for Business Executives” for insights into leveraging the power of AI technology for business and personal productivity. Available now on Amazon.