The Syrian Opposition HNC's Decision to Go to Geneva
[This post has now been supplemented with a video statement by US Secretary of State John Kerry. It will be updated when necessary in comments.]
The Syrian opposition's High Negotiation Committee (HNC) communiqué of Jan. 29 says it would join the Geneva talks after receiving "UN assurances." The HNC added it would "take part in the political process to test the seriousness of the other side through discussions with the UN team."
In its statement, the HNC stressed that its decision to take part in the Geneva talks "was designed to help implement international commitments and meet humanitarian demands as a prelude to the negotiating process as well as to bring about a transitional process through the formation of a transitional governing body with full executive powers."
The statement pointed out that "the decision to participate was made after the HNC received support from friendly and sister countries, especially during a meeting held yesterday [28 January] between the committee and Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir who made it clear Saudi Arabia supported the HNC's decisions, and "a letter from the United nations Secretary-General who reaffirmed support for the implementation of humanitarian commitments, particularly Articles 12 and 13 of UNSCR 2254".
The HNC also said that "the decision was made after reaffirmations by the US Secretary of State John Kerry about his country's support for the full implementation of the UN Security Council Resolution 2254, especially with regard to the humanitarian issues. UNSCR 2254 resolution calls for ending the blockades, releasing detainees, and immediate cessation of indiscriminate bombing of civilians."
The statement says "Kerry reiterated his country's support for bringing about a political transition in Syria through the formation of a transitional governing body with full executive powers in accordance with the Geneva Communiqué of 2012."
The HNC emphasized that its decision to participate in the Geneva talks "was based on the support it received from a number of foreign ministers of sister and friendly countries in addition to a letter from the United nations Secretary-General who reaffirmed support for the implementation of humanitarian commitments, particularly Articles 12 and 13 of UNSCR 2254."
The statement concluded noting that the decision to participate "was also based on a response from the UN envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura" to a letter the HNC sent earlier.
https://bit.ly/1SimAkD
Russian Air Campaign in Support of Assad Continues Uninhibited
Meanwhile the Russian air campaign in the period January 23 - 28, 2016 continued to target opposition-held terrain in an effort to solidify regime gains and increase negotiating leverage in the days immediately prior to the Geneva talks on January 29, writes Jodi Brignola for the ISW.
Russian warplanes targeted over 40 separate locations in Aleppo, Idlib, Latakia, Hama, Homs, Damascus and Deir ez-Zour Provinces from January 26 - 28. Russia's intervention has significantly changed the situation on the ground, enabling significant regime victories in Aleppo, Latakia, and Dera'a and placing the regime in a superior negotiating position after suffering a number of meaningful losses to both the armed opposition in Idlib and ISIS in Eastern Homs in early- and mid-2015.
Russian warplanes continued to support the regime's clearing operations in Northeastern Latakia and target locations in Western Idlib, likely to set conditions to seize the strategic town of Jisr al-Shughour and secure regime control over the high ground in the Jebel al-Akrad and Jebel Turkmen mountain ranges. The Russian air campaign also continued to target opposition-held positions in Northwestern Aleppo and supported regime efforts to tighten the siege on the opposition-held pocket in Northern Homs. In the south, regime forces continued their offensive in Dera'a with the support of Russian air power after fully capturing opposition-held Sheikh Meskin on January 25.
UK Envoy for Syria Gareth Bayley stated that Russian assistance in the Sheikh Meskin operation "reveals the hypocrisy of Russian targeting in Syria," and that "this blatant targeting of opposition groups is deeply concerning, particularly as it comes just days before UN-led negotiations for a political settlement leading to transition in Syria." The UK envoy also criticized Russia for the way Russian warplanes targeted the town, which has essentially left the city leveled.
Russian warplanes continue to indiscriminately target civilian-populated areas, incurring high numbers of civilian casualties. The Russian air campaign targets ISIS-controlled territory in Northeastern Aleppo, ar-Raqqa, and Deir ez-Zour at the expense of civilian casualties.
The activist organization Raqqa Slaughtered Silently reported that the majority of Russian strikes that target ISIS-held Raqqa City hit civilian-populated residential neighborhoods, while no more than 15 percent actually target ISIS's strongholds in the city.
The graphic accessible from the link below depicts ISW's assessment of Russian airstrike locations based on reports from local Syrian activist networks, Syrian state-run media, and statements by Russian and Western officials. This map represents locations targeted by Russia's air campaign, rather than the number of individual strikes or sorties.
https://bit.ly/1SRuYqX
Staffan de Mistura 'optimistic and determined' after meeting opposition in Geneva
The U.N. Syria's envoy Staffan de Mistura said today 31 January that he was "optimistic and determined" following an informal meeting with the opposition delegation, after it had threatened to leave before planned peace talks begin in earnest.
"I am optimistic and determined because it's an historic occasion not to be missed," Staffan de Mistura told reporters as he left a Geneva hotel after an informal meeting with delegates from the High Negotiations Committee.
The meeting took place outside the U.N.'s European headquarters, where talks on ending Syria's nearly five-year conflict have been scheduled.
The meeting came a day after HNC representatives said for now they would not enter the hoped-for indirect talks with representatives of President Bashar al-Assad's government, who began formal talks with de Mistura Friday.
Before agreeing to sit down for the so-called proximity talks, in which de Mistura is set to shuttle between the sides, HNC has demanded that humanitarian aid first gets through to besieged towns, that bombing of civilians ceases and that hundreds of prisoners are released.
"We only came to Geneva after written commitments on the fact that there would be serious progress on the humanitarian issues," HNC spokeswoman Basma Kodmani told reporters.
"We are here for political negotiations but we cannot start those until we have those gestures," she said.
De Mistura meanwhile said it remained unclear if the HNC would agree to an official meeting at the U.N. later today 31 January.
It is "up to the HNC to let us know," he said, stressing though that he was "optimistic, and we are working hard."
He said he had paid the "courtesy call to the HNC" since "they deserved that we pay attention to their own concerns." "I have been explaining what is the plan and what all meetings are about," he said.
He told journalists that HNC would "let you know and let me know when and how they can be part of this exercise."
https://bit.ly/1Su2LVQ
The Opposition High Negotiations Committee's meeting with de Mistura: the UN's take
UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura has met with the delegation of the opposition's High Negotiations Committee (HNC) at their hotel in Geneva following their arrival last night 30January, where UN-mediated intra-Syrian talks began Jan. 29 after days of delays.
According to de Mistura's spokesperson, the envoy paid a courtesy visit to the HNC delegation and held a “short informal meeting [that was] useful in addressing issues relating to the intra-Syrian talks.”
Separately, the UN Deputy Special Envoy for Syria, Ramzy Ezzeldin Ramzy, paid a courtesy visit to the hotel of the delegation of the Syrian government to discuss practical arrangements related to the next steps in the talks, according to the spokesperson.
he government delegation, headed by the Permanent Representative of Syria to the UN, Bashar Jaafari, held a preparatory meeting with de Mistura on Friday at the opening of the talks.
Speaking to reporters later that day, the Special Envoy said “the issue is obviously that any type of ceasefire discussions, which is obviously something that we are aiming at, apart from substantive discussions on the future of Syria, need two interlocutors […] that is why for us it is very important to have an indication of where we are on the presence of the High Negotiations Committee (HNC)” responding to questions about discussions among the opposition about attending the Geneva talks.
One of their key concerns he said, included the desire “to see a gesture from the government authorities regarding some type of improvement for the people in Syria during the talks, for instance release of prisoners, or for instance some lifting of sieges.”
De Mistura has said the Geneva meetings will start with proximity talks and are expected to last for six months, with Government and opposition delegations sitting in separate rooms and UN officials shuttling between them.
https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsId=53133#.Vq5SgFKN9Zg
Uninvited PYD delegation leaves Geneva
Representatives from Syria’s largest Kurdish armed group, the PYD (Democratic Union Party) left Geneva Saturday 30 January after being excluded from the negotiations, a Kurdish official and opposition figures said.
Saleh Muslim, co-president of the PYD, left when it became clear he would not be invited to participate, according to PYD official Nawaf Khalil.
The participation of the PYD has been a divisive issue in advance of the Geneva talks. Turkey considers the PYD-YPG a terrorist organization and, more importantly, the HNC claims they are in fact allied with the Syrian government and Russia. They recently received Russian weapons while receiving also weapons from the US to fight the IS. They are also opposed by Iraq's KRG which supports a rival organization, the KNC.
Unlike other groups from outside the HNC that were invited as advisers, the PYD received no invitation from U.N. Special Envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura.
The move not to include the PYD angered Qadri Jamil, a former Syrian deputy prime minister who has become an independent opposition figure and is not part of the HNC. Jamil said the PYD’s military wing has been the most effective force on the ground in Syria fighting the Islamic State group.
“The PYD is a historic part of the Syrian democratic opposition and PYD today is fighting terrorism on the ground and it is a main force,” Jamil told a group of journalists in Geneva on Saturday. Jamil said they are working with the U.N. to resolve the crisis regarding the representation of the PYD.
Bassam Bitar of the opposition’s Movement for a Pluralistic Society said the PYD will most likely be invited to take part in future rounds of negotiations. Russia said the same.
(Mostly based on the AP as in https://hrld.us/1VzA4Gq)
Comment: The problem is that though the danger posed by the IS will be evoked, this is a conference about the Syrian civil war with two sides, the government and the opposition, on how to carry out the implementation of the Geneva I communiqué of 30 June 2012 on putting an end to the Syrian civil war. It is not a meeting where all Syrian ethnic, religious and political groups are consulted. The opposition believes the PYD-YPG has the tacit support of the Syrian government. While it has received weapons from the US to fight the IS under the umbrella of the Syrian Democratic Forces it dominates, the YPG has now also received a shipment of weapons from Russia. It has been practicing ethnic cleansing against Sunni Arabs in ethnically mixed areas such as Tal Abyad and more generally Hasaka province. It has attacked the FSA in the vicinity of Aleppo. No wonder the opposition does not welcome it. There are Kurds in the HNC delegation. The KNC, the PYD's rival, is affiliated with the opposition.
The PYD would probably however have its place in a conference about fighting the IS, or one about consulting all Syrian ethnic, religious and political groups.
Bombs kill 60, wound dozens near Syria Shiite shrine: Syrian state media
While UN envoy Staffan de Mistura and a delegation of the Syrian opposition met in Geneva for the first time, at least 60 people were killed and dozens wounded today 31 January by a car bomb and two suicide bombers in the Sayeda Zeinab district of Damascus, where Syria's holiest Shiite shrine is located, the Syrian interior ministry said.
The IS claimed responsibility for the attacks, according to Amaq, a news agency that supports the group. It said two operations "hit the most important stronghold of Shi'ite militias in Damascus". But Syrian authorities blamed the opposition.
Syrian state television showed footage of burning buildings and wrecked cars in the neighborhood. State news agency SANA, quoting an interior ministry source, said a group of militants had detonated a car bomb near a public transport garage in the neighborhood's Koua Sudan area.
Two suicide bombers then blew themselves up nearby as people were being rescued.
"Bodies were still being pulled from the wreckage," a witness told state news channel Ikhbariyah.
The heavily populated area in the south of the city is a site of pilgrimage for Shiites from Iran, Lebanon and other parts of the Muslim world.
The explosions occurred as representatives of Syria's government and its divided opposition began convening in Geneva for the first U.N.-mediated peace talks in two years.
Syrian Prime Minister Wael al-Halaki was quoted as saying the attacks were prompted by "terror groups" who sought to "raise their morale after a string of defeats" by the army.
The Sayeda Zeinab shrine area witnessed heavy clashes in the first few years of the war but has since been secured by the Syrian army and Shi'ite militias led by Hezbollah, which has set up protective roadblocks around it.
The shrine houses the grave of the daughter of Ali ibn Abi Taleb, the cousin of Prophet Mohammed, whom Shiites consider the rightful successor to the prophet. The dispute over the succession led to the major Sunni-Shi'ite schism in Islam.
Many Iraqi and Iranian Shi'ite militia groups that have volunteered to fight Sunni Islamist radicals in Syria in a conflict that has heavy sectarian overtones often say they are coming to Syria to defend the shrine and have established their headquarters in the area near the shrine, according to residents.
Reuters as in https://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2016/Jan-31/334838-eight-dead-in-two-blasts-near-syria-shiite-shrine-activist.ashx?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transactional&utm_campaign=Newsletter
The opposition and the government side have held each other responsible for the attack, which is likely to have been carried out by a third party, in all likeliness the IS though Al Nusrah or another Islamist group could be involved.
New Russian incursion in Turkish air space
Meanwhile Turkey has complained of a new Russian aerial incursion said to have taken place on Jan. 29. Ankara said a Russian SU-34 warplane breached its airspace despite repeated warnings, accusing Moscow of seeking to escalate tensions and warning of consequences two months after Turkish F-16s downed a Russian jet for violating its territory from Syria.
Turkey said it summoned Russia's envoy to the Foreign Ministry in Ankara, "strongly" condemning and protesting the alleged breach.
The Su-34 entered Turkey’s airspace at 11:46 a.m. local time yesterday 29 January, despite repeated warnings from Turkish radar operators in Russian and English, the Foreign Ministry in Ankara said in an emailed statement.
“Russia will have to face the consequences if it continues these violations of Turkey’s sovereign rights,” said President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an, whose country on Nov. 24 became the first NATO member to down a Russian jet since 1952 -at least officially.
Tensions between Ankara and Moscow have been mounting since the November downing of a Russian SU-24 jet by two Turkish F-16s, for what Turkey and its NATO allies maintain was a brief breach of Turkish territory from Syria.
Russia has imposed economic sanctions against Turkey, deployed an S-400 missile system to its Hmeimim base in Syria, and escalated its bombing campaign against Ankara-backed Turkmen rebels in Syria, as part of Moscow’s campaign to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Turkey, the Syrian opposition, Amnesty International and other NGOs have in return accused Russia of killing civilians, supporting "state terrorism" with its backing of the Damascus regime, and fueling the worst refugee crisis since World War II, while NATO has increased the number of AWACS radar planes operating in Turkey.
"Until the November strike, Turkey and Russia had managed to compartmentalize their differences over the Syrian conflict, where Ankara seeks to oust Mr. Assad and Moscow is fighting to bolster the regime", writes The Wall Street Journal. "Presidents Erdo?an and Vladimir Putin had even taken steps to deepen economic cooperation and energy ties, unveiling a natural-gas pipeline project and canceling another Russian gas link to Europe via Bulgaria in late 2014 (...)".
The Russian jet’s alleged breach of Turkey’s airspace on Friday is “a new and concrete sign that the Russian Federation is seeking to escalate problems,” Ankara said.
“We stress once again that the Russian Federation bears full responsibility for any calamitous developments that may arouse from irresponsible actions such as this one.”
https://on.wsj.com/1ZZZZbC
NATO Secretary General's Jens Stoltenberg stated for his part on Jan. 30: "A Russian combat aircraft violated Turkish airspace yesterday, despite repeated warnings by the Turkish authorities. Previous incidents have shown how dangerous such behavior is.
"I call on Russia to act responsibly and to fully respect NATO airspace. Russia must take all necessary measures to ensure that such violations do not happen again.
"I welcome the direct contacts between Ankara and Moscow, and I call for calm and de-escalation.
"NATO stands in solidarity with Turkey and supports the territorial integrity of our Ally, Turkey.
"Allies agreed in December to increase the presence of AWACS early warning aircraft over Turkey, as we continue to augment Turkey's air defenses. This decision precedes yesterday's incident."
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_127562.htm
US Secretary of State John Kerry Video Statement on Syria Negotiations
31 January 2016
For almost five years, the world has watched in horror as Syria has disintegrated into a brutal conflict, killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions both within and outside the country. Syria today is an unfolding humanitarian catastrophe, unmatched since World War II.
In recent months, a new and broad-based diplomatic initiative was launched, for the first time involving all of the key countries in the conflict. The goal is to reduce the violence, isolate terrorist groups such as Daesh, and create the basis for an inclusive, peaceful, and pluralistic Syria we all seek.
This weekend, we enter a pivotal phase in that diplomatic effort. Officials from the Syrian regime and an inclusive opposition represented by the High Negotiations Committee, begin UN-sponsored negotiations in Geneva. This morning, in light of what is at stake in these talks, I appeal to both sides to make the most of this moment - to seize the opportunity for serious negotiations - to negotiate in good faith, with the goal of making concrete, measurable progress in the days immediately ahead.
The world is hoping that both sides will move quickly to meet the needs of millions of desperate Syrians, to reduce the pressure on neighboring countries, to reduce the levels of migration, and to help restore peace and stability.
The main topics on the agenda for these negotiations include arrangements for a nationwide ceasefire and establishing a path to a political transition that will bring this conflict to an end in accordance with the Geneva Communique of 2012 and UN Security Council Resolution 2254.
Now, while battlefield dynamics can affect negotiating leverage, in the end there is no military solution to this conflict. Without negotiations, the bloodshed will drag on until the last city is reduced to rubble and virtually every home, every form of infrastructure, and every semblance of civilization is destroyed. And that will ensure an increased number of terrorists created by, and attracted to, this fight. This conflict could easily engulf the region if left to spiral completely out of control. That is what the negotiations in Geneva can prevent.
There is also an urgent and compelling imperative required by international law and simple human decency that we take steps now to improve the situation on the ground for the Syrian people.
The humanitarian crisis, already disastrous and unacceptable, is actually growing worse by the day. The numbers alone are staggering. An estimated 13.5 million Syrians are in urgent need now of humanitarian aid. Six million are children. Hundreds of thousands are still trapped in areas where food deliveries are non-existent or rare. Behind each of these numbers is a human being just like any of us - a man, woman, or child experiencing suffering on an almost unimaginable scale.
Shockingly, less than one percent - one person in a hundred, one area in a hundred - of the besieged population of Syria received food aid in all of 2015. And we are not just talking about remote, hard-to-reach areas.
The town of Madaya is just an hour's drive from Damascus. And yet, in recent months, its people have been reduced to eating grass and leaves. How has the regime and the militias that support it responded? By planting land mines and erecting barbed wire to keep relief workers out. This weekend, we heard reports that another 16 people in the town have died due to starvation amid the bitter winter's cold. Other residents have been described as walking skeletons.
And the tragedy in Madaya is far from the only case. Overall, since the beginning of last year, the Syrian regime has received 113 requests from the United Nations to deliver humanitarian aid. Astonishingly, just 13 of these requests have been approved and implemented. Meanwhile, people are dying; children are suffering not as a result of an accident of war, but as the consequence of an intentional tactic - surrender or starve. And that tactic is directly contrary to the law of war.
Let me be clear. The Syrian regime has a fundamental responsibility; all the parties to the conflict have a duty - to facilitate humanitarian access to populations in desperate need, not in a week, not after further discussions, but right now - today.
Under Resolution 2254, the government and all parties have an obligation, as well, to cease bombings and other attacks against civilians - not eventually, again, but immediately. The international community must be united in pressing for compliance. Both governments supporting the opposition and especially governments that are supporting Bashar al-Assad, whose forces control the vast majority of the territory under siege, have this obligation also.
We must not forget what the Syrian people will always remember: Assad and his allies have, from the very beginning, been by far the primary source of killing, torture, and deprivation in this war; and the primary magnet drawing foreign fighters to Syria, giving cause to Daesh.
In recent weeks, colleagues from the International Syrian Support Group have been in constant contact in order to forge a more unified and collaborative approach to de-escalating this conflict, and also to ensure access to besieged areas for humanitarian workers and supplies. The world needs to push in one direction - toward stopping the oppression and suffering of the Syrian people and ending, not prolonging, this war.
Nothing would do more to cut the legs out from under Daesh than a negotiated political solution in Syria that would allow all sides, all parties, all countries, to focus on defeating the terrorist group Daesh once and for all. This imperative was underlined yet again just this morning, when terrorist bombers attacked a religious shrine, killing dozens, in Damascus.
The people of Syria deserve a real choice about the kind of future that they want. Not a choice between brutal repression on one side and terrorists on the other; that's the choice the Assad regime would like to offer. What the people of Syria need is the kind of choice that emerges from a credible political process.This week in Geneva, that political process can get underway. The road ahead remains challenging. Success is not assured. But we have seen through years of savage fighting what the absence of serious negotiation yields.
So I urge all parties to seize this opportunity and go forward with the best interests of their country in mind. The United Nations Security Council has created a framework for bringing the war in Syria to an end. It embraces a ceasefire, humanitarian access throughout the country, a transition process, and elections within 18 months in which Syrians can determine the future of Syria.
So the opportunity now is real and present to achieve a future that ensures Syria's unity, independence, territorial integrity, and non-sectarian character; to keep state institutions intact; and to protect the rights of all Syrians, regardless of ethnicity or religious denomination.
We call upon the parties in Geneva to take the first urgent steps and not to miss the chance this moment presents.
https://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2016/01/251899.htm
Retired Independent Consultant, Author
8 年Nations gather in Rome to discuss anti-Islamic State push, Libya Twenty-three nations will gather tomorrow 2 February to plot their fight against the Islamic State militant group in Syria and Iraq and how to choke off its rise in Libya. The meeting takes place as talks have begun in Geneva to try to end the five-year Syrian civil war, which has killed at least 250,000 people, driven more than 10 million from their homes and drawn in the United States and Russia on opposite sides. The nations from the wider Global Coalition to Counter ISIL will review their efforts to regain Syrian and Iraqi territory from the jihadist group and to discuss ways to curb its wider influence, notably in Libya, officials said. U.S. officials said the Pentagon's fiscal year 2017 budget will call for more than $7 billion to fight Islamic State, up roughly a third from the previous year's request to Congress. Tomorrows meeting will cover stabilizing areas such as the Iraqi city of Tikrit, which has been wrested from the group, as well as broader efforts to undercut its finances, stem the flow of foreign fighters and counter its messaging, officials said. The spread of Islamic State in Libya, where rival factions are struggling to form a united government nearly five years after a Western coalition helped topple dictator Muammar Gaddafi, will feature prominently, a senior U.S. official said. "Where they control territory is where ... it gets on our radar screen," he told reporters, saying the group was trying to seize parts of Libya, notably Sirte, and Washington would work with the Libyans and coalition partners to try to prevent that. Despite the focus on Libya, Syria and Iraq remain the main theaters of action against Islamic State. Syrian government troops and allied fighters captured hilly countryside near Aleppo today, putting a key supply route used by opposition forces into firing range, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Rebels said the offensive was being conducted with massive Russian air support, despite a promise of goodwill steps by the Syrian government to spur the peace talks, which U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura declared had begun today. Opposition official Monzer Makhous said de Mistura was overstepping by declaring peace talks had begun and said the government must within days declare its willingness to stop attacking civilians and allow humanitarian access. "We are here for a few days. Just to be clear, only a few days," Monzer told Reuters Television "If there (is) no progress on the ground, we are leaving. ... We are not here for negotiations, we are here to test the regime's intentions." https://in.reuters.com/article/mideast-crisis-coalition-idINKCN0VA3S4 Meanwhile President Obama’s envoy to the anti-IS coalition, Brett McGurk, said today that he had just completed a two-day weekend trip in Syria, the first known visit by a senior United States official since the coalition began airstrikes there in 2014. McGurk said he had spent a day touring Kobani, the small border town where Kurdish fighters backed by heavy American bombing repelled an invasion by Islamic State fighters almost exactly a year ago. The US envoy said he had toured other places in northern Syria as well to evaluate the success of the campaign to defeat the Islamic State. He said the visit had not been tied to, or timed to coincide with, the diplomatic talks beginning in Geneva, from which Syria’s PYD-YPG Kurdish group is not invited, not being part of the opposition. Another Syrian Kurdish group, the KNC, is represented as an opposition member. “Of course there were questions about that process,” McGurk said. He would not comment on who had been invited to the talks, but said he and other American officials had restated their support for the United Nations resolution that endorsed the peace process, calling for a unified, multiethnic and multisectarian Syria. “This is just the beginning of a process, and we emphasize the need for inclusivity, particularly as this process unfolds,” he said. https://nyti.ms/1QDh5cI , https://reut.rs/1QDh3BB
Retired Independent Consultant, Author
8 年UN: How to monitor and enforce a Syrian deal? A “Draft Ceasefire Modalities Concept Paper” by U.N. envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura’s team, obtained by Foreign Policy, says that “The current international and national political context and the current operational environment strongly suggest that a U.N. peacekeeping response relying on international troops or military observers would be an unsuitable modality for ceasefire monitoring.” In the short term, de Mistura believes Damascus’s forces and the armed rebellion would themselves have to monitor any cease-fire agreement. If ground security improves, the U.N. envoy’s office could widen its role in Syria, provide training and resources to locals, and act as a go-between between the key Syrian combatants and international players. But the heavy lifting would be left to the fighters and their foreign backers, known as the 17-nation International Syria Support Group (ISSG). “There must be a clear shift from the ISSG role of sponsor [of the political process] to guarantor of agreements,” the U.N. paper states. “The ISSG will need to coordinate the efforts of key member states, and provide operational liaison with government and armed opposition counterparts, in order to drive the brokering and sustaining of a national ceasefire, and the achievement and maintenance of local agreements.” “There is … a risk of mission creep,” the U.N. paper states. “As such, it is imperative to clearly articulate those roles which a monitoring mission would not be capable of doing.” “With respect to the physical monitoring of ceasefire initiatives, it is anticipated that this will at the outset be undertaken by national counterparts, building on examples already in place (such as in Zabadani),” the paper notes. Though de Mistura no longer envisages a network of local ceasefires gradually expanding to the whole country, as John Landis said, “each one of those [1,500 local fighting] groups are going to have to be dealt with, either killed or negotiated with, town by town.” In the Security Council de Mistura acknowledged that Syria will “remain highly fragmented, volatile, and militarized” for the foreseeable future. “In such a situation, it would be extremely challenging to deploy international monitors to conduct observation tasks on the ground,” he said. De Mistura’s paper outlines three options for monitoring a cease-fire: deploying a “fully independent international” monitoring operation, relying on local monitors with technical support from the international community, and deploying a more traditional team of local and international monitors. That last option would provide the “highest levels of credibility,” but it “entails high physical risk,” requiring security assurances from armed groups and their international backers to shield the process from being threatened by violent “spoilers.” Over time, the international community must work toward deepening its role in supporting peace efforts on the ground, de Mistura warned. “This means we must collectively understand and accept the risks involved,” he said. “We are on standby to develop a realistic approach.” https://atfp.co/1PPUk8B and What's in Blue. Comment: Unfortunately we are quite some distance away from a ceasefire. The current talks are "proximity" talks, ie the parties are not meeting face to face, and the UN will shuttle from room to room (or hotel to hotel), once the HNC is satisfied that it has received sufficient assurances to start the process. It is reported that the UN has put forward a proposal that is acceotged by the HNC, whose leader Riad Hijab is expected in Geneva any time.
Retired Independent Consultant, Author
8 年Syrian opposition considers U.N. offer after "positive" talks Syria's opposition delegation is considering a proposal by U.N. special envoy Staffan de Mistura that could pave the way to the delegation pressing ahead with talks after holding their first meeting with him on Sunday, a Western diplomatic source told Reuters. The proposal hasn't been made public yet. Representatives of the Higher Negotiation Committee (HNC), which includes political and armed opponents of the Assad regime, had warned earlier in the day that they may yet walk away from the Geneva talks unless the suffering of civilians in the five-year conflict is eased. With Islamic State bombers killing over 60 people near the country's holiest Shi'ite shrine, the Syrian government's chief delegate retorted that the blasts in Damascus merely confirmed the link between the opposition and terrorism. After the HNC initially insisted air strikes and sieges of Syrian towns must end before it joins the "proximity talks", in which de Mistura would meet each side in separate rooms, there appeared to be some signs of a softening in their position on Sunday evening. HNC spokesman Salim al-Muslat described discussions with de Mistura as very positive and encouraging "concerning humanitarian issues." The delegation met for several hours later on Sunday 31 January to debate the proposal. The U.N. special envoy's office said he would meet the Syrian government delegation on Monday at 1100 hrs local time (1000 GMT) and the HNC at 1700 (1600 GMT). "De Mistura made them a proposition, and that's tempting them to enter the negotiations. They are very prudent," a Western diplomatic source told Reuters, adding he was not aware of the content of the offer. The delegation representing the HNC is seeking a halt to attacks on civilian areas, the release of detainees and a lifting of blockades. It has a list of 3,000 women and children in Syrian government jails. The measures were called for in Security Council resolutions 2254 and 2558 approved last month that endorsed the peace process for Syria. "They want tangible and visible things immediately. Things they can give to their grassroots," the source said. "Certain things aren't possible immediately like the end of the bombings (??), but the easiest is the release of civilians, women and children." U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described the talks - the first in two years - as long overdue. "I urge all parties to put the people of Syria at the heart of their discussions, and above partisan interests," he said during a visit to Ethiopia. In Washington, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry urged both sides to seize the opportunity to make progress. "In the end there is no military solution to the conflict," he said in a televised statement (see previous post). The Syrian government's delegation head in Geneva, Syria's permanent representative at the UN Bashar al-Jaafari, said Damascus was considering options such as ceasefires, humanitarian corridors and prisoner releases, but suggested they might come about as a result of the talks, not before them. "Absolutely, this is part of the agenda that we agreed upon and that will be one of the very important topics we will discuss among ourselves as Syrian citizens," Jaafari said. Russian air strikes have killed nearly 1,400 civilians since Moscow started its aerial campaign in support of Assad nearly four months ago, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said yesterday 31 January. Opposition delegate Bassma Kodmani said the bombings had increased in the last week. "In preparations for the negotiations, everything has intensified. The sieges have become total," she said, adding later that her delegation was likely to stay at least three to four days in Geneva. Yesterday, the United Nations said that Mouadamiya, a rebel-held town of 45,000 on the southwestern edge of Damascus, faced a new siege by government forces. Moscow has objected to two Islamist rebel groups, Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham, taking any part in the talks. However, the negotiator from Jaish al-Islam, Mohamed Alloush, told Reuters he was going to Geneva to show that the Syrian government was not serious about seeking a political solution. In another sign that talks may gather pace, the Western diplomat and a source close to the opposition said the HNC's coordinator Riad Hijab could also arrive on Monday. Islamic State claimed responsibility for yesterday's attacks in the Sayeda Zeinab district of Damascus, according to Amaq, a news agency that supports the militant group. It said two operations "hit the most important stronghold of Shi'ite militias in Damascus." Jaafari claimed the blasts confirmed the link between the opposition and terrorism, pointing to the attacks and comments from a leader of the Southern Front, another rebel coalition. "This confirms what the Syrian government has said over and over again - that there is a link between terrorism and those who sponsor terrorism from one side and some political groups that pretend to be against terrorism," he said. Jaafari added that Damascus favored "an enlarged national government" as one phase of the process, but made no mention of creating a transitional administration without Assad, as the opposition demands. The Geneva I communiqué which is a basis for the talks calls for the transfer of all executive power to a mutually agreed transitional body in charge of drafting a new constitution and organizing free elections. It does not mention Assad, but the presidency is the main seat of executive power in Syria. Based in part on https://www.reuters.com/article/mideast-crisis-syria-blast-talks-idUSKCN0V90PJ