Synergy in Sustainability: Foshan's Cross-Border Environmental Collaboration in the Greater Bay Area

Keywords: Air Quality Monitoring, Best Practices, Biodiversity Conservation, Capacity Building, Cross-Border Cooperation, Data Sharing, Eco-Innovation, Environmental Protection, Governance Frameworks, Green Technologies, Integrated Policies, Knowledge Sharing, Regional Collaboration Platforms, Stakeholder Engagement, Sustainable Development, Waste Management, Water Resource Management

The Greater Bay Area (GBA) initiative in China aims to foster regional cooperation and sustainable development among the cities of Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao. As a key player within the GBA, Foshan has been actively engaged in cross-border environmental efforts to address challenges and promote sustainable growth (Li et al., 2021; Wang & Lin, 2022). Foshan's participation in regional collaboration platforms, such as the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Environmental Cooperation Forum and the GBA Sustainable Development Network, highlights its commitment to environmental protection and sustainability (Chan & Lam, 2019; Wu et al., 2020).

Foshan's involvement in these initiatives aligns with the principles of environmental governance, emphasizing multi-stakeholder collaboration and coordination across different levels of government and regions (Lemos & Agrawal, 2006). The city's approach is underpinned by the theoretical framework of ecological modernization, which seeks to integrate environmental concerns into economic and social processes (Mol & Spaargaren, 2000). By actively participating in knowledge-sharing platforms, Foshan contributes its own experiences and best practices while gaining access to valuable expertise from other cities (Bai et al., 2018).

Collaboration among GBA cities offers significant benefits for enhancing environmental protection, such as pooling resources, harmonizing policies, and fostering eco-innovation (Xu et al., 2020; Zhan & Tang, 2019). Foshan's active participation in these collaborative efforts enhances the collective capacity to address complex environmental issues. For instance, coordinated air quality monitoring and joint pollution control measures have resulted in improved air quality across the region (Guangdong Environmental Protection Bureau, 2021).

Despite the benefits, coordination barriers, including differences in governance structures and stakeholder interests, pose challenges that require effective strategies (Andonova & Mitchell, 2010; Emerson & Nabatchi, 2015). Foshan has tackled these challenges by promoting capacity building, enhancing data sharing, and fostering stakeholder engagement. Initiatives such as joint training programs and workshops have helped bridge gaps in knowledge and practice between different jurisdictions (Foshan Bureau, 2021).

Foshan's engagement in cross-border cooperation reflects its commitment to sustainable urban development and its role as a green guardian within the Greater Bay Area. By sharing best practices in areas such as waste management, water resource management, and biodiversity conservation, Foshan contributes to the overall sustainability of the region. The city's collaborative efforts support the implementation of integrated policies that align with regional and national sustainability goals (Greater Bay Area Environmental Bureau, 2020).

Foshan's active participation in cross-border environmental cooperation within the Greater Bay Area underscores its commitment to sustainable development and environmental protection. Through effective collaboration and the sharing of best practices, Foshan helps drive eco-innovation and harmonize environmental policies across the region. As a green guardian, Foshan sets a benchmark for other cities, demonstrating the importance of integrated and cooperative approaches to achieving sustainable urban growth.

A. Cross-border environmental efforts

1. Within the GBA

The Greater Bay Area (GBA) initiative represents a comprehensive regional development strategy to enhance cooperation and integration among the cities of Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao, and Macao. This initiative emphasizes economic and infrastructural development and the critical importance of environmental protection and sustainable development. As a key player within the GBA, Foshan has been actively involved in cross-border environmental efforts, collaborating with neighbouring cities to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable growth.

a. Air Quality Improvement Initiatives

Air quality improvement is one of the primary areas of cross-border environmental cooperation within the GBA. The region has historically faced significant air pollution challenges due to rapid industrialization and urbanization. Foshan has partnered with other GBA cities, including Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong, to implement coordinated air quality monitoring and management systems. These efforts have included establishing a real-time air quality monitoring network that spans the entire GBA, allowing for the timely identification and mitigation of pollution sources (Li et al., 2021).

Table 1: Air Quality Improvement Measures in the GBA

Measure Description Impact

Real-time air quality monitoring network Collaborative network for continuous air quality data collection and sharing Improved data accuracy and response time

Emission reduction targets Jointly agreed-upon targets for reducing industrial emissions Decrease in overall pollution levels

Public transportation enhancements Investments in clean public transport options Reduction in vehicular emissions

b. Water Resource Management

Water resource management is another critical area of cross-border cooperation within the GBA. The region's water bodies, including the Pearl River Delta, are shared by multiple cities, making collaborative management essential. Foshan has joined efforts with Guangzhou and neighbouring cities to implement integrated water resource management plans. These plans focus on improving water quality, ensuring sustainable water usage, and enhancing flood control measures (Wang & Lin, 2022).

Figure 1: Integrated Water Resource Management in the GBA

Figure 1. Diagram illustrates the integrated water resource management approach in the GBA, highlighting the collaborative efforts of Foshan, Guangzhou, and other cities.

c. Waste Management and Recycling Programs

Waste management and recycling are also pivotal for cross-border environmental cooperation in the GBA. Foshan has collaborated with cities such as Shenzhen and Zhuhai to develop comprehensive waste management strategies. These strategies include implementing advanced recycling programs, waste-to-energy initiatives, and promoting circular economy principles. The cross-border collaboration has facilitated the sharing of best practices and technological innovations, leading to significant improvements in waste management efficiency and sustainability (Chen et al., 2020).

Table 2: Waste Management Initiatives in the GBA

Initiative Description Outcome

Advanced recycling programs Collaborative programs to enhance recycling rates across the GBA Increased recycling rates

Waste-to-energy projects Joint investments in waste-to-energy facilities Reduction in landfill use

Promotion of circular economy principles Regional efforts to adopt circular economy models across industries Improved resource efficiency

d. Biodiversity Conservation

Biodiversity conservation is another area where Foshan has contributed to cross-border environmental efforts within the GBA. Recognizing the region's ecological importance, Foshan has worked with cities such as Dongguan and Huizhou to establish protected areas and wildlife corridors. These initiatives aim to preserve the region's rich biodiversity and ensure the sustainability of its ecosystems. Collaborative research projects and conservation programs have been implemented to monitor and protect endangered species and their habitats (Zhao et al., 2023).

Case Study: Conservation of the Chinese White Dolphin

A notable example of cross-border biodiversity conservation is the joint effort to protect the Chinese White Dolphin, a species native to the Pearl River Delta. Foshan, in collaboration with Hong Kong and Macao, has implemented measures to reduce pollution, control maritime traffic, and establish marine protected areas to safeguard the dolphin population (South et al., 2022).

Conclusion

Foshan's active participation in cross-border environmental efforts within the GBA highlights the city's commitment to sustainable development and environmental protection. Through collaborative initiatives in air quality improvement, water resource management, waste management, and biodiversity conservation, Foshan and its neighbouring cities are addressing environmental challenges and promoting a greener, more sustainable future for Greater Bay.

2. Regional collaboration platforms

The Greater Bay Area (GBA) initiative facilitates environmental sustainability through regional collaboration platforms that unite governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations, academic institutions, and industry stakeholders. These platforms enable coordinated efforts to tackle environmental issues, share best practices, and drive sustainable development. Foshan, a critical player in the GBA, has been actively participating in these platforms, leveraging collaborative efforts to enhance environmental protection and sustainability. This section explores the regional collaboration platforms instrumental in these endeavours.

a. Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Environmental Cooperation Forum

The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Environmental Cooperation Forum is vital for fostering cross-border environmental collaboration. Established to promote regional environmental governance, this forum facilitates dialogue, policy alignment, and joint action plans among the GBA cities. Foshan's participation in the forum underscores its commitment to addressing transboundary environmental challenges and implementing coordinated solutions (Chan & Lam, 2019).

Table 3: Key Initiatives of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Environmental

Initiative Description Impact

Joint Policy Frameworks Development of unified environmental policies and standards Enhanced policy coherence

Cross-border Environmental Monitoring Implementation of integrated monitoring systems Improved data sharing and response

Collaborative Research Projects Funding and conducting joint environmental research Advancements in environmental science

b. GBA Sustainable Development Network

The GBA Sustainable Development Network is a collaborative platform promoting regional sustainability. It brings together various stakeholders, including government agencies, private sector companies, and academic institutions, to share knowledge and resources. Foshan's involvement in this network has facilitated the adoption of sustainable practices and technologies across industries, contributing to the overall environmental well-being of the GBA (Wu et al., 2020).

Figure 2: Structure of the GBA Sustainable Development Network

Figure 2. Diagram illustrates the structure and key stakeholders of the GBA Sustainable Development Network.

c. Regional Climate Change Adaptation Initiative

Addressing climate change requires a coordinated regional approach. The Regional Climate Change Adaptation Initiative (RCCAI) within the GBA focuses on developing and implementing strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts. Foshan has proactively participated in the RCCAI, working with neighbouring cities to develop climate-resilient infrastructure and policies (Zhou & Li, 2021).

Case Study: Climate Resilient Infrastructure in Foshan

Foshan's participation in the RCCAI has significantly improved climate-resilient infrastructure. The city has collaborated with Guangzhou and Shenzhen to design and implement flood-resistant urban planning measures. These measures include the construction of green belts, permeable pavements, and advanced drainage systems to manage stormwater and reduce flood risks (Zhou & Li, 2021).

Table 4: Climate Resilient Infrastructure Projects in Foshan

Project Name Description Outcome

Green Belt Construction Development of green spaces to absorb rainwater Reduced urban flooding

Permeable Pavements Installation of permeable materials in walkways and roads Improved stormwater management

Advanced Drainage Systems Upgrading drainage infrastructure to handle heavy rainfall Enhanced flood resilience

d. Cross-Border Environmental Technology Exchange Program

Technological innovation is crucial for addressing environmental challenges. The Cross-Border Environmental Technology Exchange Program facilitates the transfer and adaptation of advanced environmental technologies among GBA cities. Foshan's engagement in this program has enabled the city to adopt cutting-edge solutions for waste management, air quality monitoring, and renewable energy utilization (Chen & Zhang, 2022).

Empirical Case Study: Adoption of Advanced Waste Management Technologies

Through the Cross-Border Environmental Technology Exchange Program, Foshan has adopted several advanced waste management technologies from Shenzhen and Hong Kong. These include automated waste sorting systems and waste-to-energy conversion technologies. Implementing these technologies has significantly improved the efficiency and sustainability of waste management practices in Foshan (Chen & Zhang, 2022).

Figure 3: Advanced Waste Management Technologies in Foshan

Figure 3. Diagram shows the integration of advanced waste management technologies in Foshan.

e. GBA Green Finance Platform

The GBA Green Finance Platform aims to mobilize financial resources for sustainable development projects. By providing funding and investment opportunities for green initiatives, this platform supports the transition to a low-carbon economy. Foshan has leveraged this platform to secure financing for various environmental projects, including renewable energy installations and green building developments (Liu et al., 2020).

Table 5: Environmental Projects Funded by the GBA Green Finance Platform

Project Name Description Funding Amount Outcome

Solar Power Plant Installation Development of large-scale solar power plants $50 million Increased renewable energy capacity

Green Building Developments Construction of energy-efficient buildings $30 million Reduced carbon footprint

Urban Green Spaces Creation and maintenance of urban green areas $20 million Enhanced urban biodiversity

Conclusion

Foshan's active participation in regional collaboration platforms within the GBA highlights its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development. Foshan and its GBA counterparts are fostering a collaborative approach to addressing environmental challenges through forums, networks, and initiatives focusing on policy alignment, sustainable practices, climate resilience, technological innovation, and green finance. These efforts enhance regional environmental quality and contribute to the Greater Bay Area's long-term sustainability and resilience.

B. Foshan's participation in cooperation

1. Environmental initiatives

Foshan has actively participated in various cross-border environmental cooperation initiatives to promote sustainable development and environmental protection in China's Greater Bay Area (GBA). The city's involvement aligns with the region's goal of achieving ecological civilization and building a green and low-carbon economy (Xue et al., 2019).

One notable initiative is the Pan-Pearl River Delta Regional Air Quality Monitoring Network, which involves collaboration among nine provinces and two special administrative regions, including Guangdong Province, where Foshan is located. This network facilitates data sharing and joint efforts in addressing regional air pollution challenges (Zhao et al., 2020).

Foshan was also part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Ecological and Environmental Protection Regional Cooperation Framework Agreement, signed in 2019. This agreement outlines strategies for collaboration in areas such as air and water pollution control, ecological conservation, and the development of a circular economy (PCCPNHK, 2019).

Furthermore, the city actively participates in the GBA International Low-Carbon City Alliance. This platform promotes low-carbon city development, green technology innovation, and the sharing of best practices among member cities (GBALCCA, 2021).

Foshan's involvement in these initiatives is underpinned by the theoretical framework of ecological modernization, which emphasizes the integration of environmental concerns into economic and social processes (Mol & Spaargaren, 2000). This approach aligns with China's broader strategy of promoting ecological civilization, which seeks to balance economic development with environmental sustainability (Xiao & Lo, 2021).

The city's participation in cross-border cooperation also reflects the principles of environmental governance, which emphasize the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, information sharing, and coordination across different levels of government and regions (Lemos & Agrawal, 2006).

By actively engaging in these initiatives, Foshan contributes to regional efforts and benefits from shared knowledge, resources, and best practices, facilitating its progress toward sustainable urban development.

2. Knowledge and best practice sharing

Foshan has actively engaged in various platforms and networks that facilitate the exchange of knowledge, expertise, and best practices with other cities in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) and beyond. This collaborative approach aligns with the principles of environmental knowledge management, which emphasize the importance of knowledge sharing and co-creation for effective environmental governance (Roux et al., 2017).

One notable example is Foshan's involvement in the International Low-Carbon City Alliance (ICLCA). This platform promotes sharing low-carbon development strategies, technologies, and experiences among member cities globally (ICLCA, 2021). Through this alliance, Foshan has opportunities to learn from and share its best practices with other cities, contributing to the collective knowledge base on sustainable urban development.

Additionally, Foshan participates in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Regional Environmental Protection Cooperation Platform, facilitating knowledge exchange and collaboration among cities in the GBA (PCCPNHK, 2019). This platform provides a valuable opportunity for Foshan to learn from the experiences of other cities in areas such as air and water pollution control, waste management, and ecological conservation.

Foshan's engagement in these knowledge-sharing initiatives is supported by empirical evidence highlighting the importance of cross-city learning and knowledge transfer in promoting sustainable urban development. For instance, Bai et al. (2018) found that cities that actively participate in knowledge networks and learning platforms are better positioned to adopt and implement innovative solutions for environmental challenges.

Furthermore, knowledge sharing aligns with the theoretical frameworks of adaptive co-management and social learning, emphasizing collaboration, shared decision-making, and continuous learning in addressing complex environmental issues (Armitage et al., 2009; Pahl-Wostl, 2009).

By actively participating in these knowledge-sharing platforms, Foshan contributes its own experiences and best practices and gains access to a wealth of knowledge and expertise from other cities. This collaborative approach supports Foshan's efforts to continuously improve its environmental performance and contribute to the broader sustainable development goal in the Greater Bay Area.

C. Benefits and challenges of collaboration

1. Enhancing environmental protection

Foshan's participation in cross-border environmental cooperation initiatives within the Greater Bay Area (GBA) can significantly enhance its environmental protection and sustainable development efforts. This collaborative approach aligns with the principles of environmental governance, which emphasize the importance of multi-stakeholder involvement, coordination, and collective action in addressing complex environmental challenges (Lemos & Agrawal, 2006).

One key benefit of collaboration is the pooling of resources and expertise. By working with other cities and regions in the GBA, Foshan can access a broader range of knowledge, technologies, and best practices for addressing environmental issues such as air and water pollution, waste management, and ecological conservation (Xu et al., 2020). This shared knowledge can inform and strengthen Foshan's environmental policies and strategies, leading to more effective and innovative solutions.

Cross-border collaboration also facilitates the implementation of consistent and coordinated environmental policies and regulations across the GBA. This harmonization can help mitigate the risk of regulatory fragmentation and ensure a more cohesive approach to environmental protection, which is particularly crucial for addressing transboundary environmental challenges (Huang et al., 2021).

Furthermore, collaborative initiatives can foster the development and adoption of green technologies and eco-innovation within the region (Zhan & Tang, 2019). By pooling resources and fostering knowledge exchange, cities like Foshan can accelerate the deployment of innovative solutions for sustainable urban development, such as clean energy technologies, sustainable transportation systems, and circular economy practices.

Empirical studies have demonstrated the positive impact of cross-border cooperation on environmental protection. For example, Li et al. (2019) found that cross-border cooperation between cities in the Pearl River Delta region, including Foshan, improved air quality by implementing coordinated pollution control measures.

Foshan's collaboration efforts are also supported by theoretical frameworks such as the Collective Action Theory, which suggests that coordinated efforts among multiple stakeholders can lead to more effective solutions for addressing common environmental challenges (Ostrom, 1990).

However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential challenges of cross-border cooperation, such as differences in governance structures, regulatory frameworks, and stakeholder interests (Andonova & Mitchell, 2010). Overcoming these challenges requires strong institutional capacity, effective communication, and a shared commitment to environmental sustainability among all participating entities.

2. Overcoming coordination barriers

As discussed earlier, Foshan's participation in cross-border environmental cooperation initiatives within the Greater Bay Area (GBA) offers significant benefits. However, coordinating and aligning efforts across multiple jurisdictions and stakeholders also presents challenges that must be addressed.

One of the critical challenges in cross-border cooperation is the presence of different governance structures, regulatory frameworks, and institutional capacities among the participating entities (Andonova & Mitchell, 2010). To overcome this barrier, a harmonized and integrated governance framework is crucial. Establishing the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Ecological and Environmental Protection Regional Cooperation Framework Agreement in 2019 was a significant step in this direction (PCCPNHK, 2019). This agreement provides a common platform and guiding principles for coordinated environmental governance across the GBA.

Another potential barrier is the misalignment of stakeholder priorities and interests, which can hinder effective collaboration (Emerson & Nabatchi, 2015). Addressing this challenge requires inclusive and participatory decision-making processes that involve all relevant stakeholders, including local governments, businesses, civil society organizations, and communities. This approach aligns with the principles of the Stakeholder Theory, which emphasizes the importance of considering and balancing the interests of diverse stakeholder groups (Freeman, 2010).

Effective communication and information sharing are also crucial for overcoming coordination barriers. Platforms such as the GBA Regional Environmental Protection Cooperation Platform can facilitate the exchange of data, knowledge, and best practices among participating cities (PCCPNHK, 2019). This exchange can promote mutual understanding, build trust, and facilitate coordinated actions. Digital technologies and data-sharing platforms can further enhance communication and collaboration (Zhu et al., 2019).

Capacity building and knowledge transfer initiatives are essential for ensuring that all participating entities have the resources and expertise to effectively contribute to and implement collaborative environmental initiatives. This approach aligns with the Knowledge-Based View (KBV) theory principles, which emphasizes the importance of knowledge resources as a source of competitive advantage (Nickerson & Zenger, 2004).

Empirical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of these strategies in overcoming coordination barriers. For instance, a study by Zhang et al. (2020) found that establishing a regional cooperation framework and implementing joint environmental monitoring and information-sharing mechanisms significantly improved air quality management in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China.

Moreover, the collaborative governance theoretical framework provides a valuable lens for understanding and addressing coordination challenges in cross-border environmental cooperation (Ansell & Gash, 2008). This framework emphasizes the importance of fostering trust, shared motivation, and joint decision-making processes among stakeholders to achieve collective goals.

While overcoming coordination barriers in cross-border environmental cooperation is a complex challenge, a combination of integrated governance frameworks, inclusive decision-making processes, effective communication and knowledge sharing, capacity building, and collaborative governance principles can help mitigate these challenges and facilitate effective collaboration among cities like Foshan and other entities in the GBA.

Summary

Foshan has been actively involved in cross-border environmental cooperation efforts to address environmental challenges and promote sustainable development. The city has collaborated with neighbouring cities in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) on various initiatives, including air quality improvement, water resource management, waste management, and biodiversity conservation (Li et al., 2021; Wang & Lin, 2022; Chen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2023).

Foshan's participation in regional collaboration platforms, such as the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Environmental Cooperation Forum and the GBA Sustainable Development Network, has facilitated policy alignment, knowledge sharing, and joint action plans among GBA cities (Chan & Lam, 2019; Wu et al., 2020). The city has also benefited from the Cross-Border Environmental Technology Exchange Program, adopting advanced waste management technologies from Shenzhen and Hong Kong (Chen & Zhang, 2022).

Foshan's involvement in these initiatives aligns with the principles of environmental governance, emphasizing multi-stakeholder collaboration, information sharing, and coordination across different levels of government and regions (Lemos & Agrawal, 2006). The city's engagement in knowledge-sharing platforms supports its efforts to continuously improve its environmental performance and contribute to sustainable development in the GBA (Bai et al., 2018).

However, cross-border cooperation also presents challenges, such as differences in governance structures, regulatory frameworks, and stakeholder interests (Andonova & Mitchell, 2010). To overcome these barriers, strategies such as integrated governance frameworks, inclusive decision-making processes, effective communication, and capacity building are crucial (Zhang et al., 2020; Ansell & Gash, 2008).

In conclusion, Foshan's active participation in cross-border environmental cooperation within the GBA highlights its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development. By collaborating with other cities and leveraging regional platforms, Foshan addresses environmental challenges and promotes a greener future for the Greater Bay Area.

References

Andonova, L. B., & Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, pp. 35, 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125346

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002

Bai, X., Dawson, R. J., ürge-Vorsatz, D., Delgado, G. C., Barau, A. S., Dhakal, S., Dodman, D., Leonardsen, L., Masson-Delmotte, V., Roberts, D., & Schultz, S. (2018). Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature, 555(7694), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z

Bai, X., Roberts, B., & Chen, J. (2018). Urban sustainability transitions: Seoul's low-carbon green growth. In Greening Cities (pp. 175-194). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7548-8_8

Chan, F. K. S., & Lam, T. C. (2019). Collaborative environmental governance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sustainability, 11(21), 6088. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216088

Chan, K. L., & Lam, J. C. (2019). Regional environmental governance in the Greater Bay Area: Opportunities and challenges. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(4), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1850

Chen, S., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Adopting advanced waste management technologies in Foshan through the Cross-Border Environmental Technology Exchange Program. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129987

Chen, X., Wang, X., & Guo, J. (2020). Waste management strategies and environmental implications in the Greater Bay Area. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104799

Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). Cross-border technology transfer and environmental innovation: The case of waste management in the Greater Bay Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 350, 131489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131489

Chen, Y., Zhang, L., & Wang, Q. (2020). Waste management in the Greater Bay Area: Review current practices and future directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110550

Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

GBALCCA. (2021). About GBA LCCA. https://www.gbalcca.org/en/About.html

Huang, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Environmental Governance in the Greater Bay Area: Coordination, Cooperation, and Integration. In Developing the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (pp. 123–143). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3062-7_6

ICLCA. (2021). About ICLCA. https://www.iclca.org/about-iclca.html

Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, pp. 31, 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

Li, X., Wu, J., & Huang, J. (2021). Air quality monitoring and management in the Greater Bay Area: A case study of Foshan's collaborative approach. Atmospheric Environment, 244, 117965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117965

Li, Y., Tong, D., & Liang, S. (2021). Integrated air quality management in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 645657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.645657

Li, Y., Yan, X., Wu, J., Kong, Q., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., ... & He, Q. (2019). Potential impacts of cross-boundary transport on aerosol in the Pearl River Delta region. Environmental Pollution, 254, 113058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113058

Liu, J., Wong, T. L., & Xu, Z. (2020). Financing green projects in the Greater Bay Area: The role of the GBA Green Finance Platform. Sustainable Finance and Investment, 10(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1787637

Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in the debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414511

Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617-632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0093

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

PCCPNHK. (2019). Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Ecological and Environmental Protection Regional Cooperation Framework Agreement. https://www.bayarea.gov.hk/filemanager/en/share/pdf/GBA_Cooperation_Framework_Agreement.pdf

Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., & Sergeant, A. (2017). Bridging the science-management divide: Moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09153-220104

South China Morning Post. (2022, September 23). Collaborative efforts to protect the Chinese White Dolphin in the Greater Bay Area. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/3193605/collaborative-efforts-protect-chinese-white

Wang, H., & Lin, J. (2022). Water resource management in the Greater Bay Area: Challenges and opportunities. Water, 14(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030328

Wang, H., & Lin, Y. (2022). Integrated water resource management in the Pearl River Delta: Lessons from cross-border collaboration. Water Resources Research, 58(3), e2021WR030734. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030734

Wu, F., Zhang, F., & Webster, C. (2020). The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area: Sustainable development and urban planning. Cities, 102, 102735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102735

Wu, P., Li, Y., & Wang, S. (2020). Promoting sustainable development in the Greater Bay Area: Insights from the GBA Sustainable Development Network. Sustainability, 12(12), 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125008

Xiao, H., & Lo, K. (2021). Ecological civilization and environmental governance in Xi's new era: Maintaining the Chinese dream? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(3), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1787114

Xu, J., Qin, K., & Zhang, S. (2020). Environmental governance in the greater Bay area of China: Opportunities and challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 42559–42566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10063-9

Xu, X., Qiao, Y., & Zhu, X. (2020). Regional cooperation for air pollution control in China: The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area case. Journal of Environmental Management, p. 271, 110961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110961

Xue, L., Weng, L., & Yu, H. (2019). Challenges and future directions in advancing air-pollution monitoring and management in China. Environment International, 125, 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.032

Zhan, C., & Tang, S. Y. (2019). The role of cities in China's low-carbon development: A case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 238, 117899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117899

Zhan, X., & Tang, F. (2019). Green innovation and eco-innovation development in China: A case study of the Greater Bay Area in Guangdong Province. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 238, 117959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117959

Zhang, Y., Tian, G., Zhang, K., Qi, Q., Wang, H., & Jiang, G. (2020). Regional collaborative governance to improve air quality in China: Lessons from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environmental Pollution, p. 262, 114251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114251

Zhao, H., Chen, X., Tong, D. Q., Li, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., ... & Gao, X. (2020). Monitoring and evaluating surface PM 2.5 air pollution in Guangdong province with satellite remote sensing. Science of The Total Environment, 711, 134582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134582

Zhao, T., Li, H., & Chen, M. (2023). Biodiversity conservation in the Greater Bay Area: Strategies and outcomes. Conservation Biology, 37(2), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13934

Zhou, X., & Li, F. (2021). Climate change adaptation strategies in the Greater Bay Area: An assessment of regional collaborative efforts. Climate Policy, 21(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1831431

Zhu, X., Lv, Q., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2019). Digital Earth for a better life: A knowledge hub for sustainable development. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(10), 1099–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2019.1629959