Synchronicity, Strange Attractors, Chaos Theory and Good versus Evil

Synchronicity, Strange Attractors, Chaos Theory and Good versus Evil

I do not like this day, so i must put some of it here.

God is the sole arbiter of good versus evil. God made satan, or Lucifer.

What is a day, if there were such a thing, in Heaven like ? God judges what shall be done, or allowed to be done, you must understand that there are an infinit number of levels for each act judged. The first in the immediate now, the next and width or dispersion, in the extended now, and in the extended state or width, and on to the next event or time slice in the immediate and then that same slice in the extended, each level of the extended having an infinite progression per time slice. The goal is to arrive at an Ultimate good as well as an immediate good and a good for each slice, of time and slice of progression. Not so easy is it ?

Well, Lucifer said, NO, i want immediate satisfaction, immediate pleasure, i do not care about anyone else, either now or in the future. And thus we see the birth of what is called evil. It can not exist with good, anymore than light and dark can exist in the same place and at the same time.... and so satan and 1/3 of the angels who followed him were cast out of Heaven. Jesus said of this "I saw satan fall like a bolt of lightning down form Heaven"

But what governs the laws of evil, how does it work. It is unconstrained decision, that is judged (whether to do it or not) only by the immediate, with no thought of the consequence... "if it feels good, do it".

What could possibly come from this ?

I have noticed an effect called Synchronicity, it is a built on Chaos theory.

Here there are say two or more strange attractors, this is what may cause a butterfly to flap its wings on the west coast and cause a typhoon on the east... so what is this theoretical mechanism ?

it is an unconstrained system that finds strange attractors by random occurrence as a ripple spreads out in time and space. Each pole it encounters may inhibit strength or increase strength in the particular path that it is a gate for, that exists behind the pole. Consider the number of such poles approach infinity and also that they may be linked, being second effect interactions that may be crossing or non crossing, so that the effect of on pole in the ripple may increase the effect of another pole on that same ripple as the ripple of the first event progress through time and space


a REAL WORLD EXAMPLE:

It is 1957, Two planes take off from an airport, One a Constellation one a DC-7. The DC-7 takes off right after the Constellation. One is assigned an altitude of 19,000 feet, the other 21,000 feet, on a trajectory that separates them by thousand miles. There is very little air traffic in 1957, the probability of a mid air collision is so low it is zero. Even in an unconstrained system or partially constrained as it is here. But the pilots are free to adjust their coarse to fly around bad weather,

The pilot of the constellation sees a storm in front of him and asks permission to ascend to 21,000 feet to avoid it. He is denied permission because the DC-7 is at that altitude. There is no tracking radar at this time. So he ascends anyhow and says he will go to VOR or visual navigation, that is, if he sees the DC-7, he will avoid it. Since they are both travelling in approximately the same direcetion and at a very close spped, it should be no problem.

There are a few clouds, the DC-7 flys out around a cloud and right in front of him is the Constellation. He has 5 seconds to respond, he banks right and dives, the correct maneuver and his right wing cuts off the tail of the Constellation and his right wing is also removed.

Both planes crash.

Now, reset back to the airport, consider the absolute perfect timing required in nano seconds from takeoff, a split second delay here and this never would have happens. As the event approaches, the perfect timing must continue through every increment of time, with an inverse precision, it must follow a perfect response surface. for these two planes to meet and crash. This is called synchronicity, it is governed by some unknown poles of attraction that are reinforcing the wavefront of all events that begin at the air port and even before that.

So, here is proof that two parallel paths pre existed, one that lead to tragedy and death and one that lead to a good outcome. We see these in the the decision was made half way through the flight AFTER take off, by the Constellation pilot, that caused the shift from the good path to the bad path. The precision of the bad path began long before the decision was made that caused the shift to it ! Even a one second delay at take off, would have prevented the second path from forming and executing.

This is an event that is partially unconstrained, that initiates when one pilot makes a decision for immediate gratification and dis obeys a safety rule, he decides for himself, that he can do this and it will be okay. What is interesting, as noted, as a side bar, is that the decision occurs in the midst of the chaotic loop. the start of the loop occurs before the pilots decision that initiates the path to the second bad path and end result of death. the bad loop was already in play and operating, but un occupied, unselected, it would never have been manifest if the pilot had not made the decision to ascend, but its perfect timing was in place, waiting for the decision that would cause its selection, a decision in violation of the constraints of safety, an apparently in-consequential decision that should never have been made.


now, how to account for this ? As my grandmother asked many times, "do you believe in fate", but then there is free will and the two, taken together, are an enigma.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了