In Sync

In Sync

No alt text provided for this image

Most of the time, this element of leadership development is invisible.

This is understandable because cohort relationships are not essential for many other types of training. Participants’ expectations, based on their previous experiences of traditional training, probably do not include shared responsibilities for the experiences and achievements of peers.

No alt text provided for this image


One of the biggest mindset shifts for participants in experiential and collaborative leadership development is from individual participation to cohort-based or community learning.?

Related research says:

  • >50% of learning comes through relationships with peer learners. (1996 research by the Centre for Creative Leadership)?
  • 31% of transfer relies on emotional support from managers or other social networks. (Carnall and Roebuck “Strategic Leadership Development”)

For example, if you are attending a conference or content-based training course, how you behave and what you learn makes little or no difference to others.?

In cohort-based programs, how much everybody learns and shares changes the experience and outcomes for everyone. Further, learning how to collaborate and build community is directly transferable to the challenges leaders face as they lead teams within larger organisations.

No alt text provided for this image

Converting the teacher’s lesson to adult leadership development makes the differences between subgroups even more volatile.?

Having people out of step with the whole cohort risks:

  • Disrupting the sequencing, coherence and effectiveness of the learning process.
  • Confusion from new ideas being processed differently and, as a result, the cohort becoming more out of sync.?
  • Misunderstandings and communication breakdowns obstructing collaboration and the flow of generosity between participants.
  • People feeling they have been left behind and becoming frustrated and disengaged.?
  • Unfair consumption of resources and support through catch-up efforts.?

No alt text provided for this image

Much of the above can be invisible and, therefore, not missed.

Leadership Development Managers are invited to:

  1. Make risks and costs visible.
  2. Equip participants to share responsibilities for keeping their cohort in sync.

This includes:

  • As early as possible, make shared responsibilities explicit. Change the participant role from solo learner to peer-partner and community member.
  • Making catch-up resources available ASAP and equipping participants to consume the same content, complete the same tasks, have the same experiences and post the same reports.
  • Setting firm boundaries for catch-up efforts so everyone knows what to expect. For example, to be in-step with the cohort, catch-up tasks and reporting are completed inside 1 month or before the next whole cohort session.
  • If you want to be extra clear about shared responsibilities, have peer-partners post catch-up efforts. This ensures visibility and accountability for peer support and collaboration.

No alt text provided for this image

The above systems-approach to helping cohorts stay in sync means Leadership Development Managers:

  • Are not sitting in judgement of reasons why participants need to catch up.
  • Are responsible for equipping and enabling partnerships to help each other stay in sync with the whole cohort.


Conversation Invitation

This series of short articles is offered to:

  • Share ideas to serve people responsible for leadership development in organisations.
  • Attract ideas and input from others who wish to improve leadership development.
  • Start useful conversations towards applying ideas in your own context.

If you are responsible for leadership development in your organisation and wish to explore how to apply ideas in your context, please chat with me with no obligation or cost. I will learn from your context-specific applications and, hopefully, we will both enjoy exploring and inventing.??Click here?to book a 30-minute chat.??

Thank you in advance for adding to this conversation.?


No alt text provided for this image


Scott Arbuthnot is a leadership consultant, program designer, facilitator and coach with 28 years experience designing experiential learning processes. Scott is an independent scholar with 100+ published articles.?

Scott believes leaders learn best together, in networks of lasting relationships sharing support, feedback and challenge.?So … in 2003 we started e-facilitating cohorts of leaders (>4000 so far), in 2018 we upgraded the platform at www.LeadershipOnline.com.au to host programs, cohorts, events, conversations plus hundreds of articles, videos and resources.?993 leaders have joined so far.

No alt text provided for this image


Carey Crimmins

Creating effective leaders, functional teams and engaged employees | Manager Workforce Capability, Culture and Engagement at Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service |

1 å¹´

Great points about the design methodologies that make a difference in experiential leadership development programs Scott. Thanks for sharing.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Scott Arbuthnot的更多文章

  • New Focus

    New Focus

    Before the interweb, when experts were scarce and special, leadership classes looked like school. Content was king.

    1 条评论
  • Psychological Health & Safety Interventions by Teams

    Psychological Health & Safety Interventions by Teams

    Ambitious leaders in job interviews want to tell stories about their team development skills. Compassionate leaders…

  • Social and Emotional Learning

    Social and Emotional Learning

    Social and emotional learning is "the other way" leadership is developed. Especially skills that can be learned and…

  • Style & Seduction

    Style & Seduction

    Without being defeatist, leadership development seems addicted to happy ratings and sales commissions from style and…

  • Typology Instruments

    Typology Instruments

    Typology and feedback instruments, as a discussion topic, can polarise the industry. Opposing views include: Typology…

    1 条评论
  • TrustObs

    TrustObs

    Trusted Observations are the sort of feedback leaders really want. Leadership Development Managers are invited to…

  • Contentment Versus Improvement

    Contentment Versus Improvement

    Leadership Development Managers are invited to challenge their contentment before someone else does. Most leadership…

  • Happy Is Not Enough

    Happy Is Not Enough

    This series urges Leadership Development Managers to get more performance data. For example: 97% of programs are NOT…

  • Co-Facilitation

    Co-Facilitation

    This topic results from unexpected questions from Leadership Development Managers about how to achieve maximum value…

    1 条评论
  • Project Partners

    Project Partners

    Early Agreements Partnerships between internal Leadership Development Managers and external consultants can be positive…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了