Swiss Cell-& Gene Therapy
Kurt R. Müller
Optimizing Market Access by bridging & aligning life science expectations with payers & decision-makers requirements & needs. ADVISOR I CONSULTANT I CHALLENGER
This newsletter deals with the pricing and reimbursement of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) with a special focus on Switzerland which, like Germany, can assess an ATMP either as a drug or as a medical procedure. The differences between these two processes are described.
P&R for Medicinal Products or as Medical Procedure
In Europe (top 5), ATMPs are evaluated as medicinal products according to the traditional procedure, except in Germany where ATMPs can also be evaluated as a medical procedure. European P&R decisions are quite heterogeneous across European countries, apart from CAR-T, which are reimbursed in all top 5 [1]. The assessments?are similar to the approach for orphan drugs and the existing framework conditions are mostly applicable [2]. HTA authorities are reluctant to change existing frameworks for CGTs [3]. Pricing as a drug is based either on the domestic assessment of the added clinical benefit together with international price comparison or on a health economic assessment. Both methods use pricing models to manage clinical and economic uncertainties and accelerate patient access. In contrast, medical procedures in hospitals are covered by DRG-based reimbursements, with medication costs usually included[i]. The product price is the result of purchasing negotiations with the risk that the hospital will not be reimbursed for all costs (risk shift to the providers).
Swiss Cell- and Gene Therapy (May 2022)
In Switzerland, 11 cell and gene therapies have been approved by Swissmedic (as of May 2022) and 9 CGTs are reimbursed by health insurance companies. 2 are limited to specific centers or are still being evaluated. 5[ii] or nearly half of CGTs are reimbursed as medical procedures, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between product and process reimbursement. The focus on CAR-T continues in more than 500 clinical trials [4].
2 Products are CGTs without being legally an ATMP [5]. 3 CGTs require multiple dosing, which affects price evaluation. The temporary reimbursement applies to the product reimbursement, while the reimbursement of medical procedures is legally binding (KLV Annex 1) without fixing a price.
Swiss Cell- and Gene Therapy P&R Processes?
The pricing and reimbursement pathway for a GCT-Product follows the principle of a conventional drug: assessment of efficacy, appropriateness and economics whereby external and internal reference pricing are considered. At the end, the product is listed on the positive drug list (SL) with maximal prices. In addition, off label coverage may be possible on a case-by-case basis (Art. 71). In the case of birth defects, the route is identical, except that for patients under 20 years of age, payment is made from disability insurance and not from health insurance.
The P&R path for a CGT-Medial Procedure corresponds to a tariff procedure between hospitals and health insurance companies with DRG-based reimbursements. Coverage obligation is laid down in KLV Annex 1 by the Federal Department of Home Affairs (EDI/FDHA). The price is negotiated between the hospital, health insurance company and manufacturer, whereby an analogous DRG tariff together with a possible add on payment can serve as a basis.
Swiss Cell- and Gene Therapy P&R Processes
Most Cell-& Gene Therapies are approved and reimbursed in Switzerland. The main differences between the Product and the Procedure P&R paths are as follows:
??Further Information visit:
Limitation
This newsletter focuses on the pricing and reimbursement of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) with a special focus on Switzerland. The aim of this newsletter is to outline the two different P&R processes for CGTs. It is a snapshot of April/May 2022. Completeness and correctness are not claimed; Additions, corrections and comments are welcome.
References
1. Ronco V, Dilecce M, Lanati E, Canonico PL, Jommi C. Price and reimbursement of advanced therapeutic medicinal products in Europe: are assessment and appraisal diverging from expert recommendations? J Pharm Policy Pract [Internet]. 2021;14(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00311-0
2. Ten Ham RMT, Frederix GWJ, Wu O, Goettsch W, Leufkens HGM, Klungel OH, et al. Key Considerations in the Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Scotland, The Netherlands, and England. Value Heal [Internet]. 2022;25(3):390–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.012
3. Hanna E, Toumi M. Gene and Cell Therapies: Market Access and Funding. First Edit. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2020. 1–145 p.
4. ?Priesner C, Hildebrandt M. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and the Changing Role of Academia. Transfus Med Hemotherapy. 2022;49(3):158–62.
领英推荐
5. Iglesias-López C, Agustí A, Obach M, Vallano A. Regulatory framework for advanced therapy medicinal products in Europe and United States. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10(JULY):1–14.?
[ii] As in the European and US markets [4]
[i] To absorb very high medication costs within a DRG, add-on payment can be granted upon successful application.
?
?
?
?