Swades: A Dream Too Idealistic for a Reality Unchanged
Naraayan KANNAN
Director of Communications & CSR, Nissan | Strategic Communications & Crisis Mitigation I C-Suite Advisory & Change Management I Government Advocacy & Public Affairs
Understanding the Failure of Swades Through a Personal Lens
It was only after leaving India for a trip to the USA and experiencing life in the USA for a few weeks that I began to understand why Swades might have struggled to connect with its audience. Living abroad offers a unique perspective on the contrasts between the two worlds—India’s emotional depth and societal challenges versus the structured, opportunity-driven environment of the West.
Swades speaks to an idealism that resonates deeply with those who have experienced the best of both worlds. For those living in India, the film’s portrayal of grassroots struggles might have felt either too familiar or unrelatable if viewed through the lens of a NASA scientist’s extraordinary journey. On the other hand, for NRIs, the call to leave behind the opportunities of the West to solve India’s systemic issues might have felt overwhelming, impractical, or even guilt-inducing.
It was in the USA, surrounded by stories of immigrants striving to succeed, that I realized how Swades asks a profound question: What is our true purpose, and where does it lie? Yet, this deeply philosophical narrative might have been too niche for mainstream audiences in India or NRIs looking for simpler entertainment.
Understanding Swades from this dual perspective—Indian roots and NRI aspirations—shed light on its nuanced message. The film failed not because of its content but because its emotional appeal and idealism may have demanded too much reflection from audiences accustomed to escapist cinema. It took stepping away from India’s day-to-day realities to fully appreciate the weight of its themes.
The claim that Swades failed at the box office because of its core message—that India is a better option than staying in America—might oversimplify the film's reception and performance. While it's true that the film's narrative centered on a successful NRI choosing to return to India to contribute to its development, several other factors contributed to its underperformance at the box office.
Here's a deeper look:
?Challenging Core Messaging
Slower Narrative Pace
Competition and Timing
Marketing and Expectations
Cultural Disconnect
The NRI Scientist Trope as a Rarity
A Missed Opportunity for Broader Appeal
领英推荐
This framing of the NRI scientist as a savior, while inspirational, might have alienated audiences who didn’t see themselves reflected in the narrative, limiting its relatability and mass appeal.
A Much Needed A Brutally Honest Portrayal of Grassroots India
This ability to show a "brutal India" while maintaining a hopeful narrative makes Swades a spiritual successor to the socially aware films of past masters, earning it a significant place in the canon of Indian cinema that addresses rural realities.
Indians Leaving India: A Persistent Trend, Not Much Has Changed
This ongoing trend reflects a disconnection between the aspirations of individuals and the systemic reforms needed to make staying in or returning to India a more viable and fulfilling choice.
The Timeless Impact of the Water Boy Scene
Redemption in the Long Run:
Despite its lukewarm box office performance, Swades has since gained recognition as a cult classic. Its themes of patriotism and societal change have aged well, resonating with audiences who appreciate its sincerity and message.
The film's failure at the box office likely stemmed from a mix of factors beyond just its core message. It was ahead of its time, and its legacy underscores the importance of nuanced storytelling in addressing complex social issues.
Swades remains one of the greatest movies of all time, whether from Indian cinema or not, it has transcended the realms of language or culture and for those who have not seen it, beyond the messaging that did not click with its intended audience, it did personify what we felt at the time as college students.
I still make it a point to show it to my child and juniors at work, as most have never experienced village life or met their own water boy on their journeys across India. The harshness and brutality of India is only overcome by little acts of kindnesses by many of us, as rural India largely remains forgotten and lost away from the attention of Governments across the country.
One should revisit the movie, just to purely listen to why Mohan Bhargava thinks India is not the greatest country in the world, but has the potential to be one. He also adds that one should not compare India to the modernism and achievements of the US, because that is not a fair comparison and each country has its own strengths and weaknesses.
For a movie shot almost 20 years ago, his words have stark relevance even today.
Head - Aftersales Operations
3 个月Well said Naraayan
Affable Lawyer | Eloquent Speaker | Student Always
3 个月Closest movie to heart. One perspective would suggest that the movie is a modernised version of part M.K. Gandhi’s life. To begin with, the name “Mohan”. When Gandhiji came from South Africa, Gopal Krishna Gokhale (his mentor) told him to travel throughout India to understand India. Kaveri amma does same with Mohan. She tells her to visit Haridas. It is this journey which changes Mohan’s outlook towards India (as did Mohandas’ approach when he completed the subcontinent tour). The scene “pani lo pani pacchis paise ka ek glass…” best scene ever in Indian Cinema. And who better than SRK could pull out those emotions. That is the first time Mohan drinks water from glass (unbottled). His perspective undegoes big change. Failure or success of movie would be relative. I agree to an extent with Tejal Naraayan. Citizens doesn’t have patience to chew the subject, and appetite to digest real issues to understand the social fabric. You cannot expect the mass to see through the thrust in the scenes like that of “pani lo pani…” and class is more interested in glamour, grandeur, etc. Naraayan KANNAN thanks for sharing thoughts
Chief Executive Officer & Head Project Dignity with Indian Development Foundation (IDF) I Founder of A Naik & Associates
3 个月Dear Naraayan, Swades has not failed , it lives in the core of the conscious and the ones who seek inspiration beyond surface level entertainment. The best learnings although there are many, is to strive a personal ambition with the desire to give back to society. It also awakens the dormant sense of compassion and individual sense of responsibility. The wise Kaveri amma sends Mohan to visit Haridas. Haridas is the soul of the movie. A turning point in Mohan’s life, Haridas is the catalyst for change. The relations in the movie are intertwined. Above all the power of individual action to bring about change is reflected at every point in the movie. The movie is for those who resonate with higher conscious, empathy and compassion.
Contributing Editor, ET Auto
3 个月In my view, a well intended and sincere message but let down by a weak script and way too long a narrative. Shah Rukh was remarkably restrained but the supporting cast was weak. I remember telling myself that this was hardly an SRK film and guess that is where it was underwhelming. Yet, something like Chak De worked
Special Educator | Vocational Trainer | Early Childhood Educator | Teaching Faculty
3 个月Naraayan, I think the film was a not a success because we don’t think that not having electricity or clean drinking water are issues. That’s the way we live hence there was a major disconnect with the audience. If Mohan would have come up with a money making scheme for the villagers which would have truly ‘empowered’ them then I think it would have appealed to us. Electricity sab kya hai!? Paise kaise kamana hai batao ?? Even Geeta was fighting for a cause (educating children) again non issue for us. We can make do without electricity, clean water, education hence the movie failed.