Sustaining Us: How Organizations Are Evolving to Meet the Future Of Work

Sustaining Us: How Organizations Are Evolving to Meet the Future Of Work

Recently, GE explained how it will deeply revise performance reviews — an often untenable practice which has plagued organizations, both large and small for decades.  Heavy with the burden of process and time, yearly reviews have long been the bane of organizations and managers. When the facts were thoughtfully considered, the value of these reviews simply wasn't justifying the invested resources.

Most importantly, performance appraisals weren't offering employees what they needed to guide behavior and develop — as the process siphoned time from their managers. Yearly performance reviews were no longer sustaining us, or the organizations in which we work.

The average life span of a company has decreased dramatically over course of the last century. (Nearly 50% of the Fortune 500 pre-2000 have disappeared or have been the subject of a merger/acquisition.) Many become other companies, which only serves to add to the challenges that employees must face. Organizations that endure, face the dangers of aging — which can include complacency and looming obsolescence. Sustaining an organization is no small feat. Leaders must balance a variety of priorities including a strategic vision and meeting the tide of change.

While contemplating this, I've realized that we've short-changed one critical part of that discussion — sustaining "us". Contributors. People. Human beings. Here in the US for example, we work longer, but likely not smarter. We haven't fully mastered the feedback employees require to be successful. We struggle to provide meaningful career paths to amplify contributor strengths. We sometimes miss the mark concerning that managers require training and support to help team their members thrive. We ignore the importance of re-charging as human beings — leaving countless vacation days on the table.

Things just don't add up. Something had to give.

And it's been us.

However of late, there is positive movement. There are organizations getting it right, who hold a strong belief that people are their organization. They intend to evolve in a manner so structure and processes can work with people — not against them. Once petrified, I see a glimmer in leaders who see the value of addressing the organization's core people practices. Many are making the connection (see this from Google) and rolling up their sleeves to make changes. We are now actively discussing what comprises a healthy, supportive environment. I'm hearing increased chatter about psychological safety and the employer-employee exchange agreement.

With thoughtful decisions and a concerted investment in people — the relationship between employers and employees can shift in a way that will not only affect satisfaction and engagement — but creativity, innovation and success.

I'm watching with great anticipation to see what unfolds.

What is happening in your organization? Share your perspective.

Dr. Marla Gottschalk is an Industrial/Organizational Psychologist. She is the Director of Organizational Development at Allied Talent. which brings the principles of The Alliance to organizations worldwide.

 

 

 

Lokol Mack

DIRECTOR at northern kenya development consortium

8 年

quite good how do you sustain [do you fund ,elaborate further on organization ,explain further especially on funding

回复
Dr. Nicole La Verne, PsyD, LPC, MAC, CADC III, ACS

CEO/Owner - Sapphire Blue Behavioral Health Solutions, LLC

8 年

Thank you for sharing! I have thought for years that "corporate America" has missed the mark. Employees are human beings, not human capital that require healthy exchanges and relationships to be successful in any venue. Without these healthy and safe exchanges, employees often respond to employers in pathological ways. Once that occurs, no one wins. Thank you!

Jodi Kohut, LPC, NCC, BCC, PhD candidate

Advisor, Professor, Counselor- LPC, NCC, BCC

8 年

Dr. Gottschalk, thanks for the article. We need to begin to fill in the gaps that inform middle managers how their "people care" behaviors impact the ability to drive profits to the organization. The question always comes back to, "How does it impact my bottom line?" I believe we can begin to quantify this a bit through feedback processes from those mature organizations navigating the waters. People are not a means to an end. There is no end without the people that drive it.

Charles A Townsend

Contract Systems Consultant

8 年

“Organizations that endure, face the dangers of aging...” I am concerned that this?reference you made is saying that age is an issue in the work force. Please explain?how you came to this conclusion. I am seeing a workplace landscape eliminating all jobs for seniors.? At the same time, the?government is?raising the retirement age.? The gap is widening. There is an?age discrimination?law in?place to address this issue but that law is without teeth, so companies continue to practice various forms?of discrimination?against?the senior worker.? ?The result, is a big gaping hole between one's last active position and retirement if one is laid off, fired or quits.?

回复
Charles A Townsend

Contract Systems Consultant

8 年

I have experienced the blunt end of the performance review used for many years. I saw where managers used the tool as a whipping post to keep employees from receiving raises. I’ve seen the tool used to pit one worker against the other, all in an effort to make workers uncomfortable in their position. I seen the tool used to keep workers from receiving promotions to better paying positions within the company. The performance review is the perfect tool for discriminating against employees, that for what ever personal reason, a manager wants to fire without cause.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Marla Gottschalk, Ph.D.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了