Sustaining Lean Practices
Karen Martin
Business Performance Improvement | Operational Excellence | Lean Management | Strategy Deployment | Value Stream Transformation | Award-winning Author | Keynote Speaker | SaaS Founder
I was recently reminded about how difficult it is to sustain a Lean transformation and how critical senior leadership's role is in it. Backstory: Many years ago, an organization with an internal Lean team retained us for week-long visits four times a year. The purpose of our visits was general to begin with: to deepen the organization's understanding and application of Lean principles and practices. Once we got to know them, we were able to suggest pointed learning for each visit, which included mostly learn-by-doing improvement work, with heavy virtual prep, "homework," and follow-up (many calls and emails).
One of the areas they needed help with (as do most organizations) was building deeper problem-solving acumen and spreading it across the organization. We are fans of A3 Management for building internal capabilities and introduced it to them. We provided both virtual and onsite coaching. They did very well with the approach for the last two years of our engagement. Leadership and problem owners were thrilled with the practice and the results alike.
As we were winding down and preparing to leave the engagement, we were concerned about whether the client had "baked" in problem solving deeply enough for it to be sustained, especially during times of stress. Would they stick with a focused, disciplined approach to solving urgent problems once we weren't there to steer them to success? Had the internal Lean team become deeply skilled enough to do the work we had been doing? If so, would the culture support them enough to allow them to do the type of work we as outsiders had been able to do? And most importantly, were senior leaders committed enough and skilled enough to assure the ongoing discipline needed to sustain the practice that we all hoped that been baked into their organizational DNA?
Sadly, I recently learned that the answer is no, no, and no. The client has been struggling with a significant performance problem that we noted on the management reports we continue to receive and have been watching get worse over time. When I reached out to the executive who had originally retained us to check in and probe a bit about the problem we were seeing, I learned that they weren't using the structure that proper A3 management affords to solve the problem: no defined problem owner, no coach, no disciplined application of PDSA, no iterative A3 report to reflect the problem-solving process. This alone isn't the root cause for slippage as there are typically underlying reasons why organizations cease to follow management practices with which they've experienced great success.
Since we're no longer engaged with the client, we aren't in a position to help them mine for root cause and perform an appropriate intervention (the client believes its internal Lean team can and should be able to do the "forensics" work that seasoned improvement professionals can do). The senior-most leader said he'd go back to the leader who owns the greatest number of processes in the value stream and learn why A3 management wasn't being used to solve a critical problem.
I sense the client may never get back on track with problem solving until or if every single leader recommits to disciplined problem solving as an organizational value and operating with that value is a clear expectation for all parties and with all problems. Starting from the top. Someone--a leader--needs to be checking (as part of Leader Standard Work) to assure that the problem-solving work standards the organization designed and adopted are either being followed consistently or the standards are actively going through a round of improvement to address any gaps that may exist.
Seeking and sustaining excellence requires leadership to possess a fire-in-the-belly passion for it. Commitment needs to be rock solid. Otherwise, slippage ensues and mediocrity fills the void. I don't know if this client will rise to the occasion and reignite its commitment to excellence, or if perhaps they've consciously or unconsciously decided that excellence requires too much work. There are reasons why only certain athletes make it to the Olympics and why only certain surgeons rise to the top. Outstanding performance of any sort requires clarity, focus, discipline, and engagement. In the meantime, our former client's customers are suffering and I would imagine many in the workforce are as well.
Independent Consultant
5 年100% agree!
Retired/consultant
5 年very well said - the biggest issue with sustaining continuous improvement in a company's culture is this one. It's also a reason why they need to retain folks like your team, to not only check and make sure the tools are being used but to step it up a level and make sure that the organization leads in sustaining the culture change.
Director Of Facilities at Marvin Engineering Company
5 年Great article Karen. I’ve experienced several occasions where we’ve gone in and make significant gains to see it slowly return to its former state. Most, if not all, due to leadership. There’s a huge difference between knowledge in Lean and experienced application of Lean techniques. I'm a big believer that passion drives Lean implementation and the ability to sustain the gains.
Taking hiatus to care for aged parents. Open to virtual opportunities - guide/ coach/ mentor and train who wants to learn new skills to deliver sustained improvements based on ~4 decades of experience in various sectors.
5 年Breaking down a defined problem which has a rationale why it should be worked on and able to measure the gap (problem) + identifying point of impact using the time continuum where problem was recognized, occured & caused is key to support developing good problem solving skills.. at every level irrespective of it being a caused or created problem. Sorry for digressing from the actual topic - why lean fails, but above is one of the key issues, even though everyone feels their job is solving problems (reflect on it - is it fire fighting/ band-aid controls or actual problem solving/ prevention or elimination controls)
Passionate for Continuous Improvement /Industrial Engineering/ Manufacturing Systems/Program Manager/ Lean Manufacturing/ Six Sigma/ Regional Operational Excellence Manager/
5 年I liked your example about the Olympics athletes and when I started to think about it athletes need to have clarity, focus, discipline ... Plus natural skills. Problem solving skills can be taught ( as soccer, basketball,etc) but as everything is a matter of practice and natural skills. So I believe that when you are trained in problem solving and you don't use it it's because you didn't understand it at all or you just don't want the hard work. "The right people on the right seats on the bus".