SUSTAINABILITY AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT: Environmental and Social Mitigation Strategies

1.????? INTRODUCTION:

Today, businesses are not only profit-oriented but also play an important role in reducing environmental and social impacts. This requires the integration of sustainability principles into business management. In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development, which operates under the United Nations, defined the concept of sustainability as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (WCED, 1987). At the Paris Climate Summit held in 2015 to ensure sustainability and prevent global warming, it was decided to limit the long-term temperature increase target to 1.5oC compared to the pre-industrial period (Paris Agreement, 2024). While this target requires a systematic transformation, countries are expected to assume responsibility and take action within the framework of sustainability. At the same time, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted at the Paris Climate Summit covers the issues of combating climate change, social welfare and development, eliminating economic inequalities, and eliminating poverty. Accordingly, 17 goals supporting economic, social, and environmental sustainability have been set. The decisions of the Paris Climate Summit and the sustainable development goals bring along some responsibilities. The European Union (EU) is trying to lead the sustainability transformation and thus directly and indirectly influence other countries and companies..

It can be said that sustainability is a new agenda for companies in general (Yurdakul, 2023) and therefore this transformation carries uncertainties. Multilateral participation and a long-term perspective are necessary for the success of sustainability. The realization of this and the achievement of sustainability goals is possible through the widespread adoption of sustainability. In this respect, it is important to identify the motivations that lead to sustainability in companies. However, there is uncertainty in the literature about what motivates companies to make sustainability decisions and practices (Akvan Gajanayake, 2023). Businesses should first determine their sustainability strategies to reduce their environmental and social impacts. Sustainability can be possible with the participation of the entire business management. Without addressing sustainability at the strategic level, sustainability can't penetrate other functions of the company and create the expected performance. The necessity to address sustainability strategically makes it necessary to answer the question of what are the dynamics that motivate sustainability-oriented strategies.? In this study, we will examine the strategies that businesses can adopt to reduce their environmental and social impacts.?

2.????? CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABILITY:

The concept of sustainability is an ancient and pervasive principle of human thought and action. Since ancient times, people have been guided by this principle and require living in harmony with nature. The concept was first used in forestry in the early 18th century and has undergone continuous change since then (Just, 2020). Rather than treating sustainability as an 'object', it should be considered as a diverse program based on a set of promises open to a wide range of interpretations. Furthermore, sustainability implies some key positions in terms of human responsibility for our collective impact on planet Earth. Human membership in the living system implies that we have certain duties towards the whole of life. Therefore, sustainability should include at a minimum a commitment to the value of sustaining life on this planet for some time to come (Parker, 2014)..

As the impact of entrepreneurs on the environment and society becomes clearer, the issue of sustainability becomes even more important (Vanessa, 2020). Despite some of the key responsibilities that sustainability places on human beings, for many people with the lifestyle and identity created by industrialization, a deep green approach to reorganizing the economy seems quite challenging. For many green entrepreneurs, on the other hand, the environmental crisis offers great opportunities for profit-making and can be a driving force for sustainability action (Cato, Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice., 2012) (Just, 2020). Given that organizations depend on the natural environment for inputs and that organizational actions directly affect the natural environment through feedback loops, the interdependence between organizations and the natural environment is at the heart of a systemic sustainability management perspective (Starik & Kanashiro, 2013).

He argues that there are two different but complementary green approaches in business (Cato, 2012). According to the first approach, business is not monolithic and includes many people who are concerned about protecting the planet. This approach finds it sufficient to work with those engaged in industry and commerce to make their activities as sustainable as possible without significantly challenging the nature of capitalism or the model of ownership and governance. Within the same basic structure, efficiency-orientated technology and a low-impact approach are referred to as natural capitalism. When the concept of technology is evaluated from the perspective of progress and development, it is understood that the problems experienced with the industrialization process are not caused by industrialization but by the quality of technology; accordingly, it is necessary to replace existing technologies with cleaner and more sophisticated ones. This approach emphasizes technological solutions to problems such as climate change and biodiversity (Heikkurinen & Ruuska, 2021). The second approach involves building alternative models of economic organization that differ from the flawed business model that dominates the contemporary economy. This approach recognizes the end of the business model on which capitalism is based. On the other hand, business models must change not only because their current mode of operation is too harmful, but more importantly because fossil resources will be completely unavailable shortly. In addition, some economists have argued that fossil resources have become a major contributor to the economic structures made inevitable by cost escalation.

According to Elkington, it is not yet clear whether capitalism is sustainable or not, but the free enterprise model that emerged thanks to social and regulatory pressures is promising for sustainability transformation (Elkington & Rowlands, 1999). In shaping and developing corporate sustainability, environmental, social, and economic sustainability dimensions need to be addressed and managed together. The most important challenge of sustainability is strategic rather than technical. Sustainability techniques that are not aligned with company strategies can reduce the company's capacity to create and maintain a competitive advantage (Cavaleri & Shabana, 2018). Accordingly, sustainability can become a multidimensional and interdependent concept that can form efficient cycles when developed by dimensions and strategies (Hueske & Guenther, 2021)

The importance of incorporating sustainability principles into business management strategies is increasingly recognized. This is crucial not only for reducing the negative environmental and social impacts of business activities but also for long-term business success (Paul F. Buller, 2016). Adopting sustainability practices can lead to positive economic, environmental, and social outcomes and ultimately optimize the "triple bottom line" of business performance (Angappa & Alain, 2012). Some key strategies to reduce environmental impact include implementing energy-efficient practices, reducing waste and emissions, adopting sustainable purchasing and supply chain management, and investing in renewable energy sources (Moore & Manring, 2009). In sustainability practices, the implementation of energy-efficient practices is a key strategy for reducing environmental impact. This can include using energy-efficient lighting and equipment, optimizing heating and cooling systems, and incorporating renewable energy sources such as solar panels or wind turbines. By reducing energy consumption, businesses can not only reduce their environmental footprint but also save on operating costs. Another important aspect of sustainability in business management is the reduction of waste and emissions. This can be achieved through initiatives such as waste reduction, recycling programs, and emission control measures.

Furthermore, investing in renewable energy sources is a proactive approach to reducing a business's carbon footprint. By switching to renewable energy sources, businesses can reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and support the growth of the green energy sector. Sustainable strategies not only contribute to reducing environmental and social impacts but also align with corporate sustainability principles, positioning businesses for long-term success in a rapidly changing global environment.

3.????? DETERMINATION OF SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES:

It involves analyzing the environmental and social impacts of business activities, setting targets, and creating strategic action plans.

Businesses can adopt various sustainability strategies to reduce their environmental and social impacts. Here are some examples:

a.?????? Green Energy Use and Energy Efficiency: Businesses can reduce their dependence on fossil fuels to reduce their environmental impact. This can mean switching to renewable energy sources and obtaining energy from sources such as solar energy, wind energy, or hydropower. Furthermore, by improving energy efficiency, businesses can reduce their energy consumption and minimize their carbon footprint (Zhang & Li, 2018).

The use of green energy and the emphasis on energy efficiency are cornerstones of the contemporary approach to sustainable development. Renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power offer alternatives to fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and shrinking the ecological footprint. At the same time, improvements in energy efficiency also contribute significantly to reducing energy consumption and environmental impact. This harmonized integration of green energy and efficiency measures is crucial in addressing the requirements of climate change, ensuring a stable and sustainable energy future, and promoting economic growth in an environmentally sound framework. The pursuit of these strategies is not only prudent but also in line with global efforts to achieve the targets set out in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement.

???????????? i.??? Green Energy Sources and Applications: Green energy sources are more environmentally friendly and sustainable compared to fossil fuels. Renewable energy sources such as solar energy, wind energy, hydroelectric energy, and biomass can help businesses reduce their environmental impact. The use of these sources reduces greenhouse gas emissions and plays an important role in combating climate change.

?????????? ii.??? Energy Efficiency Strategies: Enterprises can adopt various strategies to improve energy efficiency. This includes measures such as improving the insulation of buildings, using energy-efficient lighting systems, preferring energy-efficient equipment, and optimizing production processes. These strategies help businesses to reduce energy costs and minimize their environmental footprint while reducing energy consumption.

???????? iii.??? Environmental Impacts and Sustainability: Green energy use and energy efficiency strategies help businesses reduce their environmental impacts and realize their sustainability goals. These strategies reduce air and water pollution by reducing the use of fossil fuels, contributing to the conservation of natural resources, and supporting biodiversity.

????????? iv.??? Economic Returns and Competitive Advantage: Green energy use and energy efficiency strategies also provide economic returns to businesses. Lower energy costs increase the profit margins of enterprises.

b.?????? Waste Minimisation and Recycling: Businesses can improve their waste management processes and establish recycling programs to reduce waste generation. Waste reduction strategies enable businesses to use raw materials more effectively and minimize waste generation. At the same time, recycling programs ensure the efficient use of resources by enabling the reuse of waste materials.

In today's world, businesses play a crucial role in addressing environmental challenges, including waste generation and management (A??r, 2021).? Businesses have the potential to significantly reduce their environmental impact and contribute to sustainable development by implementing effective waste management processes and recycling programs (Mandeep, Kumar Gupta, & Shukla, 2020). It is important to underline that businesses should prioritize waste management and recycling programs as part of their sustainability strategies. Proper management of waste is essential for businesses to minimize their negative environmental impacts and comply with relevant regulations. Innovative and cost-effective waste management practices integrated into the residential waste disposal system are mandatory to minimize contamination of soil, surface, groundwater, and food sources with heavy metals (Kumar & Wang, 2017). In addition, waste management provides opportunities for businesses to improve resource efficiency and reduce operating costs;

???????????? i.??? Waste Minimisation Strategies: Businesses can reduce the amount of waste from product design to the production process through waste minimization strategies. These strategies include increasing material efficiency, making process improvements to minimize waste generation, using recycled materials to prevent waste generation, and organizing training programs on waste reduction.

?????????? ii.??? Recycling Strategies: Enterprises can reuse and utilize waste through recycling strategies. These strategies include collecting, sorting, and processing waste materials, cooperating with recycling facilities, optimizing recycling processes, and using recycled materials.

???????? iii.??? Environmental Impacts and Sustainability: Waste minimization and recycling strategies help businesses to reduce their environmental impact and achieve their sustainability goals. These strategies contribute to the conservation of natural resources, reduce environmental pollution from waste storage and disposal, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

????????? iv.??? Economic Returns and Cost Reduction: Waste minimization and recycling strategies also provide economic returns to businesses. Recycling can reduce material costs, reduce waste management costs, and generate revenue from the sale of recycled materials. In addition, improvements made as part of waste minimization and recycling,

?????????? v.??? Compliance with Laws and Regulations: Waste minimization and recycling strategies enable businesses to comply with legal regulations and environmental standards. Compliance with legal requirements related to waste management reduces the legal risks of businesses and protects their reputation.

?c.??????? Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Businesses can reduce their environmental impact by adopting sustainability principles throughout the supply chain. This means co-operating with suppliers to promote the use of sustainable raw materials, using energy efficiently in logistics processes, and evaluating supplier performance based on sustainability criteria.

Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SCM) has emerged as a critical area of focus for businesses seeking to integrate environmental, social, and economic considerations into their operations. It provides a comprehensive overview of SCM by discussing its key concepts, strategies, challenges, and future directions. Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) has received increasing attention in recent years as businesses realize the importance of integrating sustainability principles into their supply chain operations. With growing concerns about environmental degradation, social inequality, and economic instability, companies are under pressure to adopt more responsible practices that minimize negative impacts on the planet, society, and the economy. CSRM provides a framework to achieve this goal by promoting the efficient use of resources, reducing waste and emissions, and enhancing social well-being throughout the supply chain (Tanaka, Celso, & Marcia, 2019).

???????????? i.??? Basic Concepts and Principles of CSFM: At its core, CSRM involves integrating environmental, social, and economic considerations into all aspects of supply chain management. This includes addressing sustainability issues along the entire value chain, from the procurement of raw materials to the delivery of products and services to the end consumer.

The basic principles of STZY include:

·? Environmental sustainability: Minimising resource consumption, reducing pollution, and mitigating the effects of climate change.

·? Social responsibility: Ensuring fair labor practices, promoting worker health and safety, and supporting community development.

·? Economic viability: Maximising efficiency, minimizing costs, and creating value for stakeholders while maintaining profitability.

?????????? ii.??? Strategies for the Implementation of FZM: Implementing CSRM requires a strategic approach that involves cooperation with suppliers, customers, and other stakeholders. Several strategies can help businesses integrate sustainability into their supply chain operations:

· Supplier engagement and cooperation: Working closely with suppliers to promote responsible sourcing practices, increase transparency, and build long-term relationships based on trust and mutual benefit.

· Green procurement and product design: Selecting environmentally friendly materials, optimizing product design for sustainability, and reducing the environmental footprint of products throughout their life cycle.

· Logistics optimization and waste reduction: Streamlining transport and distribution processes, minimizing packaging waste, and applying circular economy principles to promote resource efficiency and waste reduction.

· Stakeholder engagement and transparency: Communicating openly with stakeholders about sustainability efforts, addressing their concerns, and seeking feedback to improve performance.

???????? iii.??? Benefits of FZM Adoption: Adopting FZM practices can provide numerous benefits for businesses, including:

·? Cost savings: Reducing energy consumption, optimizing resource use, and minimizing waste generation can lead to significant cost savings over time.

·? Improved brand reputation: Demonstrating a commitment to sustainability can improve brand perception, attract environmentally conscious consumers, and differentiate businesses from competitors.

·? Risk mitigation: Identifying and addressing sustainability risks in the supply chain, such as resource scarcity, regulatory compliance, and reputational damage, can help businesses reduce potential disruptions and liabilities.

·? Innovation and competitiveness: Adopting sustainability can foster innovation, strengthen collaboration, and create new business opportunities, positioning companies for long-term success in a rapidly changing market.

?????????? iv.??? Challenges and Obstacles to CSRM Implementation: Despite the benefits of adopting FZM, businesses can face several challenges and barriers in implementing sustainable practices:

·? Lack of awareness and understanding: Many businesses may not fully grasp the importance of sustainability or the potential benefits of CSR, which can hinder adoption and investment in sustainable initiatives.

·? Complexity and fragmentation: Supply chains are often complex and geographically dispersed, making it difficult to monitor and manage environmental and social impacts across multiple tiers of suppliers.

·? Cost and resource constraints: Implementation of FZM practices may require upfront investment in technology, training, and infrastructure, which some businesses may perceive as prohibitive.

·? Resistance to change: Cultural mismatch, resistance from stakeholders, and organizational differences can hinder efforts to integrate sustainability into supply chain operations and require strong leadership and change management skills to overcome.

??????????? v.??? Future Directions and Opportunities: Looking ahead, the future of STZY is likely to be shaped by several emerging trends and opportunities:

·? Technological innovation: Advances in technology such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things show promise in enabling businesses to better manage sustainability risks and opportunities by increasing supply chain transparency, traceability, and efficiency.

·? Collaboration and partnerships: Collaboration between industry sectors, government agencies, and civil society organizations will be essential to address complex sustainability challenges and drive systemic change in supply chains.

·? Circular economy principles: Adopting circular economy principles such as product reuse, remanufacture and recycling can help businesses reduce waste, conserve resources, and create value from end-of-life products.

·? Regulatory and consumer pressures: Increased regulatory scrutiny and consumer demand for sustainable products and services can encourage businesses to prioritize CSR and invest in more responsible supply chain practices.

????????? vi.??? Investing in Social Responsibility Projects:? Businesses can invest in social responsibility projects that support local communities to reduce their social impact. This can take place in a variety of areas such as education programs, health services, infrastructure development projects, or environmental protection initiatives. Such projects can help businesses build stronger and more positive relationships with communities by reducing their social impact.

??????? vii.??? Increasing Employee Welfare: Businesses can reduce their social impact by improving employee well-being. Providing fair wages and benefits to employees, offering occupational safety and health programs, providing flexible working arrangements, and offering training and development opportunities can help businesses reduce their social impact and increase employee engagement.

These strategies are a few examples, but not limited to, that businesses can adopt to reduce their environmental and social impacts. Businesses should develop strategies appropriate to their characteristics and industry and place sustainability principles at the center of their business culture.

?4.????? SOCIAL IMPACT MITIGATION STRATEGIES:

These strategies include investing in social responsibility projects, enhancing employee welfare, improving supply chain management, and collaborating with communities.

Today, businesses are not only focused on profit but also take responsibility for reducing their environmental and social impacts. In this context, social impact minimization strategies play a critical role in helping businesses achieve their sustainability goals. If we mention the strategies to reduce social impacts in the process of sustainability and business management:

a.?????????????????? Definition and Importance of Social Impacts: Social impacts refer to the positive or negative effects of business activities on society. Reducing social impacts enables businesses to contribute to the welfare of society and move towards a sustainable future (Carroll & Shabana, 2005).

???????????? i.??? Social Impact Mitigation Strategies:

- Investing in Social Responsibility Projects: Businesses can reduce their social impact by investing in social responsibility projects in areas such as education, health, infrastructure and social aid.

- Improving Employee Welfare: Businesses can reduce their social impact by increasing employee salaries and benefits, offering occupational safety and health programs, and improving the working environment.

- Community Dialogue and Cooperation: Businesses can understand societal needs and develop more effective solutions by openly communicating with society and collaborating with stakeholders.

?????????? ii.??? Practices and Experiences in Enterprises: This section will examine how various businesses have implemented social impact mitigation strategies and their impact on business performance. Examples will include the experiences of businesses from different industries.

???????? iii.??? Suggestions for the Future and Conclusion: Suggestions for businesses to further develop their strategies to reduce social impacts in the sustainability and business management process will be presented and an overall assessment will be made.

Social impact minimization strategies enable businesses to build more harmonious and sustainable relationships with society.

Understanding Sustainability in Business Management: Sustainability in business management involves integrating environmental, social, and economic considerations into decision-making processes. The triple-bottom-line framework emphasizes the importance of measuring success not only in terms of financial performance but also in social and environmental terms. Businesses should recognize their role as stakeholders in society and work proactively to minimize negative social impacts while maximizing positive contributions to communities and stakeholders. Sustainability strategies to reduce social impacts provide a way for businesses to align their operations with societal needs and aspirations. By integrating these strategies into their business practices, organizations can contribute to positive social change and secure their long-term sustainability in a rapidly evolving global environment.

5.????? MANAGEMENT OF STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS:

Strategies to reduce the environmental and social impacts of businesses require effective management of stakeholder relations.

The concept of Stakeholder Management and Corporate Social Responsibility has a role in enhancing corporate reputation, building trust with stakeholders, and creating long-term value for shareholders. Businesses need to integrate sustainability principles into their management structures and decision-making processes to effectively address environmental and social challenges. In general, "Sustainability, Stakeholder Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility" should address the complex interplay between sustainability, stakeholder governance, and CSR responsibly and ethically. Stakeholder relations have an important role in the sustainability efforts of businesses because businesses interact with a range of stakeholders that are directly or indirectly affected by their activities (Smith & Wood, 2005).

Therefore, managing stakeholder relationships effectively is critical in the sustainability and business management process of businesses. Here are some important points about how stakeholder relations should be managed in this process:

a.?????????????????? Stakeholder Definition and Identification: The first step is to identify and determine all stakeholders that the business has and affects. This may include employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, environmental groups, government agencies, and other relevant stakeholders.

b.?????????????????? Communication and Persuasion: Businesses should communicate effectively with stakeholders and inform them about sustainability goals and practices. This should include an open and transparent communication process and focus on understanding and resolving stakeholder concerns.

c.??????????????????? Co-operation with Stakeholders: Businesses should develop effective collaboration with stakeholders and shape their sustainability efforts to better match stakeholders' needs and expectations. This includes involving stakeholders in processes, receiving their feedback, and developing solutions to meet stakeholder expectations.

d.?????????????????? Assessing Stakeholders' Views: Businesses should take stakeholders' views and concerns seriously and integrate them into the process of identifying and implementing sustainability strategies. Stakeholder feedback can help businesses make better decisions and create more effective strategies.

e.??????????????????? Seeking Consensus and Common Solutions: Businesses should encourage compromise and the search for common solutions to balance the different interests of different stakeholders. This involves finding solutions that take into account different interests and are acceptable to all.

f. Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Relationships: Organisations should build and maintain long-term relationships with stakeholders. This requires the development and maintenance of solid relationships based on mutual trust.

g.?????????????????? Performance Measurement and Improvement: Finally, organizations should.

In general, businesses must effectively manage stakeholder relations in the sustainability and business management process as this is critical to the long-term success of the business and maintaining harmonious relationships with society.

6.????? CONCLUSION:

Consequently, this assignment examined the critical importance of sustainability and business management, focusing on strategies to minimize environmental and social impacts. Through an extensive literature review and empirical evidence, it is clear that businesses play an important role in shaping the environmental and social landscape and have a responsibility to reduce their negative impacts while maximizing positive contributions.

The strategies discussed, including sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, ethical sourcing practices, and transparency and accountability measures, provide a roadmap for businesses to effectively integrate sustainability principles into their operations. By adopting these strategies, organizations can reduce their environmental footprint, improve social well-being, and create long-term value for all stakeholders.

The paper also emphasizes the importance of leadership commitment, organizational culture change, and collaboration with stakeholders in driving sustainability initiatives. Business leaders must recognize that sustainability is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic necessity to maintain competitiveness and ensure business resilience in a rapidly changing world.

Looking ahead, we need to deepen our understanding of the effectiveness and scalability of these strategies across different sectors and contexts.

?

REFERENCES:

A??r, O. (2021). Covid-19 sonras? uluslararas? politikadaki olas? de?i?imlere y?nelik bir de?erlendirme. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1601522

Akvan Gajanayake, O. T.-K.-R. (2023, 05 22). Motivations and Drivers for Adopting Sustainability and Circular Business Strategies in Businesses in Victoria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2559

Angappa , G., & Alain , S. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages 35-47.

Carroll , A., & Shabana, K. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Business: A Guide to Leadership Tasks and Functions. Business Horizons, Volume: 48, Issue: 4, Pages: 317–326, DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2005.03.004.

Cato, M. S. (2012). Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice. Routledge.

Cato, M. S. (2012). Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice. UK and US: Routledge.

Cavaleri, S., & Shabana, K. (2018). Rethinking Sustainability Strategies. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(1), 2-17.

Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line Of 21st-Century Business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.

Heikkurinen, P., & Ruuska, T. (2021). Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864929.0001.0001

Hueske, A. K., & Guenther, E. (2021). Multilevel Barrier and Driver Analysis to Improve Sustainability Implementation Strategies: Towards Sustainable Operations in Institutions of Higher Education. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 291,125899. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621001190?via%3Dihub

Just, V. (2020). Sustainable Business Processes in Global Companies: Current Perspectives and Future Trends regarding Efficiency and Risk Management. Germany: Springer, ISBN 9783658281960,. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28196-0

Kumar, D., & Wang, L. (2017). Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Residential Waste Disposal Sites and Its Impact on Environmental Health. Environmental Pollution, Volume: 22, ?ssue:1, Pages: 102-115.

Mandeep, Kumar Gupta, G., & Shukla, P. (2020). Insights into the resources generation from pulp and paper industry wastes: Challenges, perspectives, and innovations. Bioresource Technology, Volume 297, 122496. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122496.

Moore , S., & Manring, S. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium-sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 276-282.

Paris Agreement. (2024, 05 13). Retrieved from United Nations: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

Parker, J. (2014). Critiquing Sustainability, Changing Philosophy. UK and US: Routledge.

Paul F. Buller, G. M. (2016). A Model for Implementing a Sustainability Strategy through HRM Practices. Business and Society review, Volume121, Issue4.

Smith, N., & Wood, R. (2005). Sustainability, Stakeholder Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility. the International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, DOI: 10.1504/IJBGE.2005.007441.

Starik, M., & Kanashiro, P. (2013). Toward a Theory of Sustainability Management. In Uncovering and Integrating the Nearly Obvious. Organization ve Environment (pp. 26(1), 7-30).

Tanaka, L., Celso , A., & Marcia , T. (2019). Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review on Brazilian Publications. Gest?o & Produ??o, Volume: 26, Pages: e3974,DOI: 10.1590/0104-530X3974-19.

Vanessa, J. (2020). Sustainable Business Processes in Global Companies: Current Perspectives and Future Trends regarding Efficiency and Risk Management. Germany: Springer, ISBN 9783658281960.

WCED. (1987). Retrieved from Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, United Nations: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milestones/wced

Yurdakul, M. (2023, 08 22). Corporate Sustainability and Circular Economy in Turkish Service and Industrial Businesses. Retrieved from In Erdiaw-Kwasie, M.O., Alam, G.M.M. (eds) Circular Economy Strategies and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development Goals Series.: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3083-8_14

Zhang, L., & Li, W. (2018). Strategies for Reducing Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume: 20, Issue: 4, 589-602.