Surviving Internal Conflict

Companies, countries, and most any grouping of humans frequently face times of confusion and dissent. Whether these times destroy or enable a better future is only knowable in hindsight. What we must not do is allow tomorrow to be defined by today’s divisions. What follows is a lesson from an ancient Greek historian: Thucydides. Thucydides had little patience for hand-waving and focused on reality. (Translation is from Thomas Cahill’s Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea: Why the Greeks Matter from Thucydides’ The Peloponnesian War, Book III, Chapters 82-83.) 

“Practically the whole of the Hellenic world was convulsed, with rival parties in every state – democratic leaders trying to bring in the Athenians, and oligarchs trying to bring in the Spartans…. To fit in with the change of events, words, too, had to change their usual meanings.  What used to be described as a thoughtless act of aggression was now regarded as the courage one would expect to find in a party member; to think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for action.  Fanatical enthusiasm was the mark of a real man, and to plot against an enemy behind his back was perfectly legitimate self-defense. Anyone who held violent opinions could always be trusted, and anyone who objected to them became a suspect…. As a result…there was a general deterioration of character throughout the Greek world.  The plain way of looking at things, which is so much the mark of a noble nature, was regarded as a ridiculous quality and soon ceased to exist.  Society became divided into camps in which no man trusted his fellow.”

A final note. My Greek friends may not use this post to claim I think they are correct about anything <G>.