The Surrendered Leader
Jessica Kriegel
Chief Strategy Officer @ Culture Partners, Podcast Host @ Culture Leaders, Keynote Speaker, Author
We’ve been sold a lie about leadership.?
We’ve been told that great leaders take control. That they set the vision, enforce accountability, drive engagement, and build culture through sheer willpower.? But here’s the thing: Culture can’t be controlled. It can’t be managed like a spreadsheet or optimized like a supply chain. It’s not a machine that runs on policies and incentives.?
Culture doesn’t respond to force—it responds to conditions.?
That’s where most leaders go wrong. They’re trying to manage their way to a better culture instead of surrendering to what actually works.? And that’s the paradox of leadership. The more you try to control, the worse your culture gets. The more you let go of control and focus on shaping the right conditions, the more your culture thrives.?
This isn’t about doing nothing. Surrender isn’t inaction. It’s just a different kind of work.?
The job of a leader isn’t to fix culture. It’s to create the conditions where the right culture can emerge.?
Control vs. Surrender: What Leaders Get Wrong?
Most leaders default to management mode when they want to improve culture. That looks like:?
And then, when none of it works, they double down. More meetings. More oversight. More “accountability measures.”??
Here’s why that fails: Culture is an expression of a set of beliefs.? And beliefs don’t change because someone tells you to change them. They change because of experiences.? That’s why the best leaders don’t focus on controlling behaviors. They focus on shaping beliefs through experiences. That is ultimately the only thing they can control.?
The Surrendered Leader’s Playbook?
So what does a surrendered leader actually do? If they’re not micromanaging behavior, enforcing policies, or pushing engagement initiatives, what’s their job??
Most workplace dysfunction comes from confusion. People don’t know what success looks like, what’s expected of them, or how their work connects to the bigger picture.?
A surrendered leader doesn’t try to control people—they control the clarity they provide.?
This is the only thing a leader can fully control. Everything else flows from this.?
2. They create alignment by shaping beliefs.?
If you want people to believe in ownership, you can’t just tell them to be accountable. You have to create experiences where ownership is the natural outcome.?
The Results Pyramid explains this perfectly:?
That’s why the best leaders focus on:?
Instead of controlling behavior, they trust that the right experiences will drive the right beliefs, and the right beliefs will drive the right actions.??
3. They create a culture of accountability.?
True accountability doesn’t happen in a culture of fear. If people are afraid of failure, they will hide mistakes, avoid risk, and disengage.? A surrendered leader lets go of the need to control through fear and instead creates an environment where ownership is safe. That means:?
When people feel safe to own their work, they don’t need to be managed. They manage themselves.?
Surrender Isn’t Weakness—It’s Strategy?
This isn’t about being a hands-off leader. It’s about being a leader who knows what actually works.??
Surrender isn’t passivity.? ?
Surrender isn’t weakness.? ?
Surrender is letting go of what doesn’t work so you can focus on what does.?
That’s what a Surrendered Leader does.? And when you stop managing culture and start placing it in a position to change, everything shifts.? Let go of control. Double down on clarity. Trust the process. That’s how real transformation happens.?
Elsewhere In Culture
It’s been five years since COVID-19 upended the workplace, and yet we still haven’t solved the burnout crisis. This latest study quantifies what we already know: burnout isn’t just a personal problem—it’s a financial disaster. Companies are losing up to $21,000 per employee each year due to lost productivity and turnover. But here’s the real issue: burnout isn’t caused by employees working too hard—it’s caused by a broken culture. No amount of wellness programs or mental health apps will fix a workplace that demands constant availability, rewards burnout with promotions, or punishes people for setting boundaries. If organizations want to reduce these staggering costs, they need to stop treating burnout like an individual health issue and start addressing it as a systemic cultural failure.?
The research also reinforces a critical truth—leaders set the tone. Executives experiencing burnout cost their companies the most, and that’s no coincidence. When leaders are disengaged, exhausted, or stuck in survival mode, it cascades down through the entire organization. Culture Partners has long advocated for a shift from focusing solely on employee engagement to emphasizing fulfillment. Employees thrive when they find meaning in their work, and that fulfillment directly combats the stressors that lead to burnout. The solution isn’t just to help employees “manage stress” but to create a culture where they aren’t drowning in it to begin with. Leaders must take accountability for shaping an environment where employees don’t just survive—but actually want to stay, contribute, and grow.?
The latest JOLTS data highlights a labor market that remains resilient, with job openings increasing and layoffs declining. While the rise in quits suggests confidence among workers seeking better opportunities, the overall hiring rate remains unchanged, signaling that companies are hesitant to expand aggressively. This creates a paradox for workplace culture—employees feel empowered to leave, but organizations may not be prepared to fill those vacancies quickly. Without clear alignment between business strategy and talent planning, companies risk losing momentum. Leaders must provide clarity on career growth, workforce planning, and how economic uncertainty factors into long-term decision-making. When employees lack visibility into these factors, they are more likely to disengage or look elsewhere.?
This data underscores the need for accountability at every level of an organization. Employers must take responsibility for retaining talent by fostering a culture where employees see a path forward. If workers are quitting due to unclear expectations, stagnant growth, or lack of alignment with company goals, the accountability lies with leadership. Similarly, in a market where financial firms are seeing both job openings and layoffs, leaders must ensure they are making strategic, not reactionary, workforce decisions. Resilience in the labor market isn’t just about numbers—it’s about how well companies create an environment where employees stay because they believe in the company’s direction, not just because they lack alternatives.
AI isn't here to replace us...It's here to challenge us.
In this episode of Culture Leaders, I sat down with Karalee Close, the Global Talent & Organizational Lead at Accenture, to discuss an essential question most leaders aren't asking:
Are we using AI as a tool for growth, or are we letting it become an excuse for complacency?
Karelee believes that responsible AI is a competitive advantage. But here's the kicker: most companies aren't prepared to scale it responsibly.
We talked about everything from the evolving role of change management to why your middle managers might be the biggest obstacle to innovation.
If you're ready to rethink how technology, leadership, and accountability intersect, this episode is for you.
Watch the full episode now.
Working with high level Executives in HR, L & D, Talent Management, Leadership Development, DEI, and Talent Acquisition Practice Areas to partner with them on their Growth, Awareness, and Thought Leadership Goals.
1 天前This is such excellent insight. It provides great clarity. Thank you for sharing.
Training Manager
1 天前"culture doesn’t respond to control. It responds to conditions." Wow, that line is sticking with me. Whether it's a family, a congregation, or a company, that sentiment rings true. Thanks for the insight.
Product + UX Leader ? Create > build > launch enterprise SaaS & PaaS | Extensive 0 to 1 and Greenfield Experience
5 天前Wow! So much insight and actionable advice packed in to this article. Thank you for sharing! While your surrendered leader model is domain agnostic, I will highlight how relevant it is to Product and UX Leadership. For example, consider the desire to create a culture of ideation and experimentation and user/human centricity. One can’t mandate that or make it happen through policy, but they can surely create that culture by being a surrendered leader.
Risk/Surety Consultant @ Alera Group, Inc. | CRIS Certification
6 天前Jessica, I really enjoy your posts. Keep it up! WISDOM!!!!