The Sunk Cost Fallacy in Hockey: Identifying and Overcoming Biases for Better Performance

The concept of sunk cost can be used in hockey to adopt best practices in various aspects of the game, such as player development, team management, and in-game strategies. Sunk costs are investments of time, money, or resources that have already been made and cannot be recovered. In decision-making, it's important to avoid the sunk cost fallacy, where past investments unduly influence future choices.

Here are some ways to apply the concept of sunk cost in hockey for better practices:

1.Player development and roster decisions: Coaches and management should focus on current player performance and potential, rather than being swayed by past investments such as draft position, contract size, or reputation. If a highly paid or highly drafted player is underperforming, they should not be given more ice time or opportunities simply because of their past status. Instead, consider the current abilities and potential of all players, and make decisions based on what's best for the team.

2.In-game strategies and line combinations: Coaches should avoid sticking to predetermined strategies or line combinations that aren't working simply because of the time and effort invested in developing them. Instead, they should be flexible and adapt their tactics to the evolving game situation, even if that means abandoning a plan they previously believed in.

3.Equipment and training methods: Teams should be open to adopting new equipment, technologies, or training methods if they show promise in improving performance or reducing injuries. This means not being overly attached to past investments in older equipment or methods simply because they were once believed to be the best option.

4.Player trades and acquisitions: When evaluating potential trades or acquisitions, management should not let past investments in a player dictate their decisions. Instead, they should objectively analyze the player's current performance, potential, and fit within the team's needs. This may mean cutting ties with a player who has been part of the organization for a long time but is no longer contributing effectively.

5. Coaching and management hires: Organizations should be open to hiring new coaches and management personnel based on their qualifications and fit with the organization, rather than being influenced by past investments in current personnel. This could mean letting go of long-standing staff members if they are no longer the best fit for the team's needs.

By avoiding the sunk cost fallacy and focusing on current performance, potential, and fit, hockey teams can make more informed decisions and adopt best practices that will ultimately contribute to their success on the ice.

About the Author

Free Hockey Leadership Program

Jonathan Paul is an accomplished attorney, a Michigan Ross Executive MBA graduate, a former prosecutor, a certified executive coach, and a leader in the hockey world. Jonathan is a trusted advisor and mentor to hockey players, coaches, and organizations. Jonathan is the author of?The Power Play of Positivity: Unleashing Success in Hockey Leadership,?available on Amazon -?https://a.co/d/9dZNGxM