Sunday Brunch: Yes vs No questions

Sunday Brunch: Yes vs No questions

If we want companies to change, then we should start with simple 'yes' questions and work up to the 'Big Yes', our end objective. Don't start by demanding changes they will find it easy to say no to.

Sales techniques can help sustainability investors

I am always a bit reluctant to highlight sales tools and techniques that also work for activists and sustainability professionals. Largely this is because many of the sales examples used are a bit trite and simplistic. And while the simple tools might work in some sales situations, it's often hard to see how they work in the complex world of companies and sustainability. Getting someone to agree to a free quote for double glazing, is very different from getting a company to change it's strategy.

But many of the basic principles do translate to our world.

Identifying the end outcome you want. What some sales people call the 'Big Yes'. As the article points out:

Whatever the "Big Yes" is, it's crucial you know what it is before you enter into a conversation with your prospects. After all, you can't steer the ship to the right destination if you have no idea where you're supposed to go.

Make sure your Big Yes is achievable. There is little point is having an end objective that is not deliverable. In my experience companies will largely only act if it makes financial sense for them to do so.?

This doesn't mean that you have to only focus on short term financial gain. Despite what many analysts say, companies (and the financial markets) are not 'too short term focused'. The financial value of a company is something that comes from actions in the future, often years out in the future. What can appear to outsiders as the market responding to short term news, is often investors adjusting their long term expectations to include the impact of new short term news.

This is something we covered in a long blog back in January of this year ...

And remember what are known as intangible assets (brands, workforce skills and commitment, reputation etc) are the most important driver of long term financial value for many companies. How customers, workers and the wider society think about a company is really important to that company.

Build your case from a position of knowledge and trust - one yes at a time

This is really two points tied up in one. The first one is that trust is important in persuading a company to change. They have to believe that you have 'done your homework' on their business and that you are acting in their best long term interests. This is not something you can fake. And it takes a lot of work.

The second point is how you get to your end objective. Just as with the Yes Ladder in sales, you cannot start with a complex restructuring plan that the company can easily reject. Start with small changes that are easier to agree to and gradually build up the jigsaw.

The application to activism

For instance, you would probably not start by proposing to a retailer that they close down all of their stores and move fully to online, even if you believe that this is the best end outcome.

You might start by discussing (actually discussing, not telling) the economics of some types of locations (say high street vs out of town), and work from that to explore alternative uses for that property.

For there you could start to discuss if the stores could maybe be used as click and collect centres, then moving onto the customers typical 'purchase journey', and then adding in a discussion about the role of physical stores in the process. From there you could move on to discussing what investment might be needed to expand their online activities, warehouses, stock and order systems etc.

From there it's a short step to your end objective The big yes, but broken down into manageable topics that it's easy to say yes to.

One last thought to leave you with.

You have hopefully spotted that this process involves a lot of listening and questions, and a lot less talking and telling. But the questions need to be very specific, and at least in part illustrate just how much you have thought about the issues involved. There is no substitute for the hard work of preparation.



Steven Bowen

Sustainability meets strategy & finance @thesustainableinvestor.org.uk

7 个月

Spot on Marc Lawn - basic principles of our activist engagement include make sure you focus on value for the ‘other side’ , and always look to create a solution that everyone willingly buys into as thier own idea

回复
Marc Lawn

Maximising Your Business Potential through Strategic Insight & Operational Excellence | Transforming Businesses with Clarity & Innovation | Global Business Advisor | Ethical & Sustainable Practices

7 个月

A great thought provoker Steven Bowen. I hope you don't mind but I'd like to add two further thoughts. Firstly, I would always recommend a 'value selling' approach to this. If we identify the benefits to all parties we will make much more progress - otherwise we just risk 'telling' someone what we want them to do. It may be well placed but will automatically be seen as selfish. It's just the human reaction. Secondly, it's always better to co-create the solution. It means while the activist may demand, the demand is that they need to listen & understand as well. As a random example, we want better CO2 labelling, but what happens when we have to retrofit a 50 year old production line with digital sensors to capture the exact details of the 7 products that run down that line. Sometimes details do matter.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Steven Bowen的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了