Sudden Disturbances in Rapidly Moving Objects : The Implications of the OpenAI Fiasco

Sudden Disturbances in Rapidly Moving Objects : The Implications of the OpenAI Fiasco

Last week, OpenAI suffered management team infighting over the key direction of the company. The schism inside the company resulted in Sam Altman’s firing & Greg Brockman’s departure.

This outcome injects uncertainty in the market including key partners (Microsoft & investors) & employees about the company’s future.

Microsoft, recognizing risk with a key technology partner in one of their most important markets, stabilizes its future by hiring Altman, Brockman, & others. Microsoft has rights to the OpenAI models, has diversified its algorithm providers beyond OpenAI & counts among its staff several of the most critical people in AI.

Where does that put the ecosystem now?

Microsoft has secured its leadership position.

Microsoft owns the biggest commercial AI business in the world - about $1.5b in run-rate. OpenAI is second with a roughly similarly sized business. Some of the current OpenAI revenue will shift to Microsoft.

Microsoft counts members of the OpenAI team amongst its ranks. The company has a diversified suite of models to use & is now the most stable vendor offering OpenAI technologies.

If the rumors are true, Microsoft may also have the opportunity to build an Nvidia competitor with Altman at the helm, opening the $40b GPU market that grows at more 30% annually to the nearly $3t market cap behemoth.

OpenAI needs to stabilize itself. The leadership must declare clearly their goals, their team, & their plan for the next few years because OpenAI has confused the market & the employee base with its fast-action, strategic direction changes, & lack of clarity.

By stating to the market it aims to slow down, OpenAI poses questions to customers, commercial partners, employees, & developers about whether OpenAI will remain the industry’s technology leader.

Last week, OpenAI represented the future cloud of AI : the technology developers & product managers used to build a demo, then a beta, then a full-fledged product, rather than building from scratch.

Today, every product & engineering leader must be reconsidering that assumption.

Anthropic and other competing LLM providers will take advantage in the market to compete more aggressively. Perhaps these events trigger an M&A wave in the world of foundation models, but the anti-trust pressure from the government challenges many of the larger players.

As for startups, disruptions in the status quo are often advantageous. OpenAI’s dominant place in the developer ecosystem is suddenly at risk & presents an opportunity for smaller companies to fill a new void.

Sudden disturbances in rapidly moving objects like rockets tend to create catastrophic outcomes.

Charlie Celaya

Enabling Sellers to Reach Modern Buyers | GTM Strategy |

1 年

Tomasz Tunguz I wonder how much of this volatility we can attribute to the original message from OpenAI about free market usage of CHAT GPT, and now that for profit Microsoft has purchased them. It is a big conflict to tell a for-profit company they are now going to "slow down" due to AI dangers, while shareholders are NOT going to be ok with that message.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tomasz Tunguz的更多文章

  • The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    I remember the day I received it : my first Blackberry. A few weeks later I lost it in the back of a taxi cab in Paris.

    20 条评论
  • The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    Is tech M&A back? Google announced its intention to buy Wiz for $32b today. If approved by regulators, it would be the…

    6 条评论
  • Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Engineering teams within AI application startups are much smaller than a classic software company - maybe half the size…

    8 条评论
  • The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    Public SaaS companies’ growth rates have halved since 2023, as David Spitz pointed, from 36% to 17%. Why? There are…

    12 条评论
  • This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    Monday’s analysis cost about 27 cents to produce. This little screenshot is of Claude Code, the product I use now to…

    9 条评论
  • Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    How do you position and scale an AI company in a rapidly evolving market? Join us for an in-person Office Hours session…

    6 条评论
  • How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    A small spin-out from a publicly traded behemoth launched with the ambitious vision of transforming their entire…

    5 条评论
  • Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Imagine if every time you edited a document, the word processor forced you to retype everything that had been written…

    3 条评论
  • A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    As startups scale, effective management becomes the difference between chaotic growth and sustainable success. After…

    10 条评论
  • Lopsided AI Revenues

    Lopsided AI Revenues

    Which is the best business in AI at the moment? I analyzed Q4 revenue data from publicly traded companies across…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了