To Succeed Together, We Need to Value What Makes Us Different

To Succeed Together, We Need to Value What Makes Us Different

Our biases often cause us to expect conformity without even realizing what we are doing. And then when you layer power and management systems on top of that, that expectation gets baked into who we hire, promote, and fire. Unconscious bias gives way to discrimination.

When we are at our worst, we seek to establish dominance or to bully others at work, rather than seeking to collaborate with them. And again when you layer management systems and power on top of those instincts, things go from bad to worse.

Bullying gives way to harassment, physical violations, and violence. These are universal human failings. “Progressive” organizations drift toward coercion and conformity as surely as do “conservative” ones. But these problems are not inevitable.

If we want each person we’re working with to bring their full potential to our collaborative efforts, we need to honor one another’s individuality rather than demanding conformity. None of us (except actors) can do their best work while pretending to be somebody they aren’t.

Telling people to bring their best to work while discouraging them from being their true selves seems obviously doomed to fail. But we do that all the time, usually unconsciously.

Often we advertise that we admire people who “think different,” but then we punish or ostracize outliers. Successful collaboration requires diversity of thought and experience. Part of the benefit of collaboration is that “many hands make a light load.” But the more important benefit is that it allows us to challenge each other because each of us has a different point of view, different life experiences.?

One person easily notices something that another person is oblivious to. But if that person is punished for speaking up, they will remain silent and nobody gets the benefit of their observation. When we challenge one another, we improve one another’s work. That is why feedback at work is so vital to our individual and collective growth and success.

If we were all exact clones, we’d lose much of the benefit we get from working together. What is impossible for one person is simple for another. What is tedious drudgery for one person is a pleasure for another. We need one another.

As Denise Hamilton explains on this week’s Radical Candor Podcast , if we stop talking to those who have different values and opinions then we’re all basically siloed in our own echo chambers, stating:

“If we decide we’re going to stop talking to the Flat Earthers, the only people they have left to talk to are other Flat Earthers. And that superimposes and reinforces the concepts in a circle, and you’re never going to penetrate or get any kind of connection or reconnection with that person. We have to stay in relationship.”


LIT Videobooks Radical Respect edition is now available! Get it today and unlock a 3-free day trial to the entire LIT library. Interested in learning how your leaders and team can access the Radical Respect and Radical Candor videobooks? HR/Learning/People leaders are eligible for complimentary 2-week access to these titles and the full LIT Videobooks library. Fill out this form to get started.

Radical Respect is a weekly newsletter I am publishing on LinkedIn to highlight?some of the things that get in the way of creating a collaborative, respectful working environment. A healthy organization is not merely an absence of unpleasant symptoms. Creating a just working environment is about eliminating bad behavior and reinforcing collaborative, respectful behavior. Each week I'll offer tips on how to do that so you can create a workplace where everyone feels supported and respected. Learn more in my new book Radical Respect , available wherever books are sold! You can also follow Radical Candor? and the Radical Candor Podcast more tips about building better relationships at work.

Nannette Coerlin

Vice President @ American Express | Caring Leadership Expert, One Size Does Not Fit All ?? Anti-Guru. All my views are my own, not representing those of my employer.

4 天前

When we choose curiosity over judgment because we deep inside us know there is never just one right way of Living Loving Believing Identifying We will become the leader who can drive the positive change AND take everyone with them in the process. Including respectfully agreeing to disagree. Radical candor has to come after radical care.

Jenny Wood

Former Google executive. Author. Speaker. Consultant to F500 companies. Founder, Google’s Own Your Career Program. Follow for no-BS tips and scripts to be a more successful leader, employee, and human.

4 天前

Love this powerful reminder, Kim. When we embrace diversity of thought, everyone wins.

Ken Fanger

Humanizing Security by making allies of users and cyber security professionals! - CMMC-RP - Ohio Cyber Reservist -Speaker, Presenter, Author - advocate for changing how we promote cyber security

6 天前

It is a strange conversation because we want stable culture and diversity but many times those can be in conflict. It is easiest to get a stable culture by getting people that fit that culture, and for many companies that is people "that look like" themselves, but we all know that diversity leads to "better" outcomes. Change can be a very scary position and it is not embraced by many people. Making a diverse culture is a choice, and it takes work, and many people choose not to go that way sadly.

Elaine Gormley

Co-Owner @ A FAMILY VETERINARIAN PLLC | Veterinary Education

1 周

Thanks so much for the insightful post. There are many factors that can provide a system level improvement if stakeholders open their minds to cause and effect instead of insulating themselves from reality.

Safiah Al-Eryani

Senior Health Specialist | MPH| Public Health Strategist | Program Coordination and Stakeholder Engagement Expert

1 周

It’s called a team because each person should come with a unique personality and unique perspectives. If we were all alike, we’d just be mirrors reflecting the same thoughts! It’s all about blending those differences, not erasing them.

要查看或添加评论,请登录