Students doing homework with ChatGPT is a non-issue
A few weeks ago, I wrote an article claiming that the impact of automatic code generation by ChatGPT is much less than imagined. The hue and cry around the technology is an example of vividness bias. I am going to play the same tune again, this time about another scare around ChatGPT: students using it to cheat.
As you know, ChatGPT is a generative model. It can write assignments, solve math problems and even write papers. Everyone seems to think that this will affect the way the teachers evaluate students. It will also affect the quality of learning in students. I beg to differ. I will argue that even accepting that this is a real issue, it actually affects a very small number of students. I am restricting myself to India, whose academic environment I am familiar with.
As if students never cheated before ChatGPT came along! I studied at a very good engineering college in Mumbai. Almost everyone in my class, myself included, used to copy the journals from someone else. There were some students who used to do all their work by themselves. Will these few students use ChatGPT and stop working themselves? I doubt it, but even granting that they will, their number is really small.?
Think about the schools. India has a massive number of schools. A vast majority of them do not have enough teachers. Most of the girls and boys have to work to help their parents after school. They rarely get time to do their homework, even when there is a teacher to assign it to them.
领英推荐
I grew up in a rural place. It was not very backward and our school was well equipped. Still, most of my schoolmates did not identify with the education they received. In a class of 100 students, barely 5 have been able to make a use of the education for their living. Today the situation has changed a little, but not a lot. Imagine that a student from this region is using ChatGPT to do the homework. I would consider that as excellent progress. Not only has she started giving time to study, but she is getting used to finding answers using a tool. Since ChatGPT is a treasure of knowledge, she might find answers to problems that are real to her family; such as how to run their small business or how to take care of their animals.?
The number of such students in India is far, far larger than the students from well-to-do families in the cities, who attend the really fine schools. But do they do all their assignments themselves? Not many of them.
All kinds of guidebooks, websites and tuition classes help students in their assignments. At least one of the parents is fully involved in making sure that the child is doing everything correctly. Only yesterday I read a news article about a company losing a lot of revenue because of ChatGPT. The company used to help students do their homework. It’s unfortunate for the company, but was that not cheating as well?? I did not read many articles protesting against the fact that a large company is set up to help students to do their homework.
I am inclined to think that students using ChatGPT is a problem, but it is minute in scale. Generative AI can be used to increase the spread of ‘usable’ education in a country like India in so many ways.??We need more thinking about that.
Automotive and mobility journalist in Paris
7 个月You won't be able to stop students from using generative AI to do their work. Once that genie is out of the bottle you can't put it back in. However, you can have an open conversation with your students, if you're a teacher, or with your children, if you're a parent. Ask them how they feel about using it. Do they feel guilty? Like they are getting away with something? Or are they really, truly learning something? I think there's a middle ground between cut and paste and using generative AI as a starting point. Same with Wikipedia. The possibilities of good generative AI are nearly endless. But let's be honest, students are using it now primarily as a shortcut to actually doing the work, learning how to research, how to find sources, how to determine what's a reliable source. That's not really teaching anything except that you can cheat to get ahead.
LinkedIn Top Voice 2024 | Red Hat Partner Ecosystem | FSI Alliances | Fintechs | ISV Expansion | AI, Open Source, Cyber Security, Automation.
1 年I was renembering all the GTed sheets while reading your article. ????
Assistant Managing Editor @ Sportskeeda | Creator @Daily Sāttvik
1 年This is an interesting perspective, Devesh. You highlight a good point that it's actually counterproductive to discourage students from using new tech... Much of this probably comes from the fear of not knowing how to use Generative AI. So it would be better to understand it ourselves rather than oppose it. Rather than seeing AI and humans as man vs machine, we could see it as man and machine, like an F1 team. The car is useless without the engineers, and the engineers are useless without the car.