The Stubborn Machine: How AI Hallucinations Happen and What You Can Do About Them

AI-generated content has brought powerful new possibilities to workplaces, education, and creative fields. However, as remarkable as AI tools can be, they are not without their flaws. One of the most perplexing issues is AI’s tendency to confidently provide incorrect or entirely fabricated information—known as hallucinations.

These errors often come across with such confidence that they can appear credible, leading users to accept false information or misinterpret AI-generated results. Even more frustrating is the AI’s tendency to double down on these mistakes, presenting them with unwavering certainty. Understanding why this happens, and knowing how to manage it, is essential for anyone working with AI tools.

Why Do AI Hallucinations Happen?

To understand why AI sometimes “hallucinates,” we need to look at how these systems generate responses. Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT use probabilistic methods to predict the next word in a sequence based on the input they receive. Essentially, they generate words by assessing patterns in their training data and predicting what is most likely to come next. This means they aren’t referencing an established database of facts but are instead creating text based on what seems statistically plausible.

When an AI is confronted with an unfamiliar topic or ambiguous phrasing, it tries to fill in the gaps with the most contextually probable answer. And while it may sound convincing, the result isn’t always accurate or even real. This process of “guessing” under uncertainty is where hallucinations come into play.

Why AI Doubles Down on Its Mistakes

What makes hallucinations particularly challenging is that once an AI produces an error, it can quickly get stuck in that line of reasoning. This is due to the way language models chain words together—each word prediction influences the next, leading the AI to reinforce and justify the original mistake.

For instance, if an AI mistakenly identifies a minor historical figure as a president of a country, subsequent predictions might reinforce that error, making it increasingly difficult to reverse course. The AI is “stubborn” in this sense because it follows its initial predictions through to their logical, but often incorrect, conclusion.

How to Recognise and Manage AI Hallucinations

For users, it’s critical to develop strategies to manage these errors effectively. Here are a few practical approaches:

1. Spotting the Red Flags: When interacting with AI, be cautious of answers that sound overly confident or present unfamiliar information. If an AI-generated response feels too detailed or includes citations or quotes that seem untraceable, it’s worth verifying independently. A good rule of thumb is to cross-reference AI responses with reputable sources, especially when factual accuracy is paramount.
2. Guiding the Conversation: If the AI appears to have made a mistake, prompt it to rethink its response. Try asking it to “double-check” or reframe the question in simpler terms to reset its predictive path. For example, if the AI gives an incorrect summary of a book, you can guide it by stating, “That doesn’t seem right. Can you check that and summarise the main plot points instead?”
3. Resetting the Context: When an AI becomes “stubborn” or locked into a particular line of reasoning, consider starting the conversation over. AI systems work within a context window, where the current chat history influences the predictions. By clearing this window or opening a new chat, you give the AI a fresh start, which can help it to move past the error.
4. Directing the AI Away from Guessing: Being specific with your prompts can limit hallucinations. Ambiguity often triggers guesswork, so narrow down your requests to minimise the room for error. For example, instead of asking, “Who are some influential 20th-century writers?” you could ask, “List three well-known 20th-century American novelists and their most famous works.”

Acknowledging AI’s Limitations

Ultimately, recognising that AI doesn’t “know” information in the traditional sense is vital. It can be easy to misinterpret confident-sounding text as factual, but AI-generated responses should be seen as suggestive rather than authoritative. A language model isn’t pulling from a verified database; it’s using its training data to produce something that resembles what might be true based on statistical patterns.

Understanding this distinction can help users adopt a more critical stance toward AI-generated content. For organisations and professionals, training sessions that explain these limitations can foster more effective use of AI and mitigate the risks associated with misinformation.

Final Thoughts: Navigating AI’s Confident Errors

The illusion of insight that AI sometimes projects can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it allows for natural-sounding, engaging interactions. On the other, it risks misleading users with confidently presented fabrications. By understanding how and why these hallucinations occur, users can approach AI-generated content more critically and manage these interactions more effectively.

For those working with AI tools, the key takeaway is simple: treat AI outputs as a starting point for investigation, not the final word on any subject. By doing so, we can navigate the challenges of AI hallucinations and make better use of these increasingly powerful tools.

Richard Foster-Fletcher ?? (He/Him) is the Executive Chair at MKAI.org | LinkedIn Top Voice | Professional Speaker , Advisor on; Artificial Intelligence + GenAI + Ethics + Sustainability.

For more information please reach out and connect via website or social media channels.