Strike Against The Future Of Work

Strike Against The Future Of Work

Two different days, two different strikes in Belgium. In both cases the underlying reasons are similar: concerns about the future of jobs. Not because they are moving to low-cost countries, but because they are being replaced by machines and new business models. Digital Transformation at work.

Jobs are being replaced by machines and new business models

Yesterday employees at retailer Carrefour tried to boycott the self-scan infrastructure and today employees at De Lijn (public transportation in Flanders) are on strike because they fear job reductions in the future. Their concern is more than justified: both retail and (public) transportation will see major changes with huge impact on jobs and even the continuity of the companies these people currently work for. But will these actions really help them?

Amazon is showing the future of retail and every incumbent must change in order to survive: home delivery, fresh food ecommerce, Amazon Go cashier-less style shopping, they are all transformational business models that are hugely disrupting the status quo of retail and that will impact traditional retailers and their employees.

Amazon is showing the future of retail, disrupting the status quo

And it gets even worse when we look at the future of mobility. There is a growing consensus that in the next 7 to 15 years the entire model of car-ownership will have changed. Cars, trucks, busses, will drive themselves, no more drivers needed. This alone will make millions of jobs disappear in the coming decades.

Millions of jobs disappear in the coming two decades

So what needs to be done? Can we avoid these things from happening? The answer is no. Not because we could not come up with legislation to stop the disruption, but because we - consumers - are driving the adoption of the change ourselves. We want more shopping convenience, we want Netflix and we want lightweight banks. All these disruptors are successful because we want them, not because the government is not blocking them. A logical conclusion is that we simply cannot stop what is happening, as long as we - the consumers - want it, and that is not likely to change in the near future. So we have to embrace the change and deal with the consequences.

We simply cannot stop what is happening, as long as we, consumers want it

The problem with the current measures rolled out by retailers, banks, transportation companies and so many others, is that they are not providing an answer to the real challenges. They simply have no clue how to deal with the transformation ahead. They think that by shaving off some costs left or right they will be ready for tomorrow just by stabilizing cost/income ratios and securing the ebitda for their shareholders.

The only solution for this huge problem is a shared one

Employees will need to realise that they can’t have ecommerce or food home delivery without the flexibility of (other) employees.

Trade unions will have to realise that they should no longer fight for historically aquired rights but for future rights of workers.

Companies have the overwhelming responsibility to come up with real answers based on new technologies and changed business models. Once they have a strong future vision on their own transformation they should start to train their people so they are able to make the shift to new employment, based on what consumers of tomorrow want, and alongside machines, in a real man/machine collaboration.

Shareholders should allow the companies they own to invest heavily in this future. Any restructuring in their portfolio companies should be to fund the future, not to stabilize the current profits. If they fail to do this, they will eventually lose all their value.

And finally policy makers should create positive frameworks to allow for innovation, not just in tech but mainly in employment, taxes and income.

If we fail to address these challenges together we will be played apart by the current and future Big Tech players and we will lose.

Franziska Weir (geb. Krasnici)

CEO & Founder at INNOVATIONS:REBELL

6 年

Great article! Its going to happen and its time to find solutions. Trying to keep the past alive was never a good solution for affected business areas (e.g. mining). Its important to make people aware that they also need to start getting in touch with technology instead of dealing with it like an enemy. I′m missing publications about benefits etc.

Marc van der Meer

Inspire yourself and others I Co-Founder AFSR Academy for Social Responsibility I Co-Founder Volunteers' Help

6 年

Hi Jo, good that you're addressing these points. But I disagree that we can't do about it. We have plenty of social entrepreneurs who are fighting against these movement. Please check e.g. the documentation TOMORROW https://youtu.be/0SI-Kyam_Jk. It shows that there are more movements started globally. What about for example of atalanda. A fast growing German startup which is sells local products online and is a serious competitor to amazon, We have to join the forces and be creative. https://vimeo.com/117463208

回复

Good analysis of how transformation is inevitable. Endless (over)consumption is driven by infinite desire...and at what ‘cost’?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了