Strictly Verboten

America’s leading Throughput & Marketing Maven was schooled by the late Dr. Eli Goldratt in the Theory of Constraints. As well as H. William Dettmer. SKI is a Jonah’s Jonah able to create “Jonahs” with his branded six-day Logical Thinking Process Workshop: Jonah3+3?

Level 1 EV Charging

The Case Against Using Level I EVSE for Charging Electric Vehicles

With the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) worldwide, the methods and infrastructure for charging these vehicles have become a subject of significant discussion. Among the various charging options available, Level I Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) represents the most basic and widely accessible form of EV charging. However, despite its convenience and simplicity, there are compelling reasons why Level I EVSE should never be used for charging a car, particularly in the context of modern electric vehicles and the demands of contemporary lifestyles.

Slow Charging Speed

One of the most significant drawbacks of Level I EVSE is its extremely slow charging speed. Level I chargers typically deliver power at a rate of 120 volts and 12-16 amps, resulting in an average charging rate of about 3-5 miles of range per hour. This means that fully recharging an EV with a reasonably sized battery, such as a 60 kWh battery, can take upwards of 24 hours or more. This slow charging rate is impractical for most EV owners who require their vehicles to be ready for use within a reasonable timeframe, particularly for those who rely on their cars for daily commuting or long-distance travel.

Inefficiency and Energy Waste

Level I charging is also less efficient compared to higher-level charging options. The prolonged charging periods associated with Level I EVSE result in more energy losses through heat dissipation. This inefficiency not only increases the overall energy consumption but also places additional strain on the electrical grid. As the global community moves towards more sustainable energy practices, the inefficiency of Level I charging stands in stark contrast to these goals.

Increased Wear on Battery and Components

Prolonged charging times and the associated higher temperatures can lead to increased wear on the EV battery and other electrical components. Modern EV batteries are designed to handle faster charging rates provided by Level II and Level III chargers, which are more aligned with the optimal charging profiles recommended by manufacturers. Continually using a Level I charger can degrade the battery health over time, reducing the vehicle’s overall lifespan and performance. This degradation not only results in higher long-term costs for the owner but also poses environmental concerns related to battery disposal and replacement.

Inconvenience for Users

The practical inconvenience of Level I charging cannot be overstated. In today’s fast-paced world, the ability to quickly recharge an EV is paramount. Level I charging’s slow speed can severely limit the utility of an electric vehicle, making it less practical for spontaneous trips or emergency situations. For urban dwellers or those without access to home charging setups, relying on Level I EVSE could mean frequent stops at public charging stations, which can be both time-consuming and inconvenient.

Safety Concerns

Level I EVSE often involves the use of standard household outlets, which are not always designed to handle prolonged high-current draw. This can lead to overheating and, in some cases, electrical fires. The use of dedicated Level II charging stations, which are built with robust safety features and proper electrical specifications, significantly reduces these risks. Ensuring the safety of the charging process is crucial, particularly in residential settings where the consequences of electrical faults can be severe.

Future-Proofing and Infrastructure Development

As the EV market continues to grow, there is a pressing need to develop and adopt charging infrastructure that meets future demands. Investing in and promoting the use of Level II and DC fast chargers is essential for supporting the widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Level I charging, with its inherent limitations, does not align with the direction in which the EV industry is headed. Encouraging the use of higher-level chargers will not only provide a better user experience but also drive the development of more advanced and efficient charging technologies.

Conclusion

While Level I EVSE offers a convenient entry point for EV charging, its numerous drawbacks far outweigh its benefits. The slow charging speed, inefficiency, increased wear on vehicle components, inconvenience, safety concerns, and misalignment with future infrastructure needs make it an unsuitable choice for modern electric vehicle charging. To support the sustainable growth of the EV market and ensure a positive user experience, it is imperative to prioritize the use of Level II and higher-level charging solutions.

—