Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation: Fighting propaganda war with democratic methods

Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation: Fighting propaganda war with democratic methods

Russia’s information, or rather disinformation war, clearly accompanies its military offensive in Ukraine. It’s just the latest reminder how dangerous for democracies disinformation and information manipulation can be.

Constant and almost unlimited access to online information is one of the greatest successes of digitisation and tech advancement, but the Covid19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine showed us that it can be gamed, often in very sophisticated ways, to spread dangerous disinformation campaigns by malicious actors.

A mix of legislation

Europe has learnt its lessons. We are no longer na?ve. We are addressing this threat in a European way with a mix of legislation, such as the Digital Services Act (DSA) and unique tools, such as newly unveiled anti-disinformation Code.

Let’s be clear: this is not about critical views, but about algorithmic amplification of dangerous content, coordinated manipulative behaviour such as fake accounts or bots and about content that could create harm to our societies.

The lessons we learnt, working with online platforms and civil society show clearly that there are limits in how effective the fight against disinformation has been so far.

Four main take-aways

There are four main take-aways:

1)????Disinformation pays off.

Players that have disseminated Covid19 related disinformation have gradually moved to pro-Kremlin disinformation, many of them motivated by financial gain. Monetisation of disinformation must be stopped.

2)????Efforts ramp-up is a must.

Online platforms do not seem to dedicate resources to fighting disinformation equally in all countries and languages. Ad-hoc measures in a crisis cannot replace a structural EU-wide cooperation with fact-checkers and content moderation teams;

3)????Data is key.

Researchers need to have access to online platforms’ data to better understand the many facets of disinformation. Adequate transparency and access to data for researchers are not yet there;

4)????A joint approach to fight back.

Disinformation is often disseminated and amplified through the coordinated use of accounts. Strong action and cooperation between online platforms is essential to putting an end to the spread.

In the EU we have come up with a comprehensive approach to try to defend ourselves from this complex threat of disinformation.

The latest piece of the puzzle

The new anti-disinformation Code is the latest important piece of the puzzle in the EU disinformation toolbox. It will guide the largest digital players to take real and strong action to curb disinformation.

The aim is to become more effective in key areas, from understanding algorithms, to helping users critically assess the information they see, to removing financial gains from disinformation, and ensuring that disinformation in languages spoken by fewer people is not neglected. ?

Under the new Code, not only very large platforms but many other important players are taking very significant commitments to achieve these objectives and to better protect our societies.

Leaving no space for loopholes

Indeed, on top of major online platforms like Google, Meta, Twitter, TikTok or Microsoft, also smaller or specialised online services, participants from the online advertising sector, as well as civil society organisation offering tools or services to fight disinformation are signing the new Code.

This need not be the end of the story: all market participants are invited to join forces in the future, leaving no space for loopholes and providing for a complex response to a complex threat to our democracy.

In association with the Digital Services Act (DSA)

For the very large platforms, the Code will be underpinned by the EU pioneering law, the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The DSA will make large platforms put our society’s well-being first and their business interests second. They will have to assess how their services are gamed, and even redesign them or make them more robust against disinformation.

The Code will play an important role in the assessment of whether the very large platforms have complied with their legal obligation of mitigating the risks stemming from disinformation spreading on their systems.

And, for crisis such as the war in Ukraine, or the beginning of the pandemic, the DSA will also have an ‘alarm signal’ to trigger a fast crisis response from such large platforms.

With all the pieces we have put together in recent years, the EU sets a new global standard on how to address disinformation, misinformation and information manipulation.

The stakes are high, and our ambitions are up to the challenge.

?*

Věra Jourová, Vice-president for Values and Transparency

Thierry Breton, Commissioner for the Internal Market

Commen?ons par réfléchir sur la désinformation concernant la voiture électrique qui ne profite qu à la Chine

回复
Samuel Benichou

?? Conseil - Développement Commercial - B2B - France - Immobilier - Architecte - Médical - Santé - ?? Projets de Création, Réalisation, Rénovation, Construction de Cabinets Médicaux, Centres Médicaux ??

2 年

????this is the most difficult however the most important war, we need democratic tools, Stop #Disinformation #Congrats.

回复
Max von Abendroth

PERSONAL VIEWS *** Building ecosystems for transformational change *** philanthropy's catalytic role in partnership with private & public sectors | public-interest journalism | climate resilience | social justice

2 年
Tyler Jensen

SIMPLE? Thinking about Code and AI

2 年

"Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." These words created the gold standard of freedom 231 years ago. James Madison also wrote this: "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives." But proponents of suppression of speech by labeling it "misinformation" or "disinformation" will protest that Madison could not have foreseen our modern world. Consider another of his writings here: "There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." Why do sources of misinformation succeed? Would they have a chance if the people did not already distrust the governing sanctified sources of information, e.g. corporate media and governments? Consider one more bit of wisdom from Madison: "The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted." So what makes us trust these self-appointed ministers of truth?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Thierry Breton的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了