Strategies for Influencing a Disruptive Policyscape
Dr. Stephen Massey
Partner at Anordea | AI Governance and Corporate Affairs for Banking and Financial Services
Welcome to Inside Corporate Affairs, where we discuss the latest developments and best practices in achieving corporate affairs excellence. In this edition, turmoil in Congress as McCarthy is ousted as speaker - what should you do now? Jamie Dimon says geopolitics is the world's biggest risk, but are you prepared? And is the UK party conference season becoming a public-private partnership? All of this and more, with our focus of the week - strategies for influencing a disruptive policyscape.
This Week in Corporate Affairs
Turmoil in Congress as McCarthy Ousted as Speaker
The ousting of Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House in a dramatic leadership shakeup has plunged the US House of Representatives into a state of political chaos and uncertainty. This high-profile development has raised significant concerns for businesses, particularly regarding the potential for a government shutdown and its broader implications. McCarthy's removal was precipitated by a revolt within his own party, where hardline conservatives objected to his compromise with Democrats, aimed at averting a government shutdown. McCarthy, who announced that he would not seek re-election as Speaker, now leaves the House without clear leadership, leading to a contentious internal power struggle within the GOP. For businesses, the situation demands a strategic and adaptive approach to navigate the unfolding policyscape. Monitoring political developments closely is key, as it helps assess how these changes may impact various legislative and regulatory issues directly affecting operations. Relationship-building with key lawmakers becomes crucial, particularly those positioned to play a pivotal role in resolving the leadership crisis and influencing policy decisions. Leaders must diversify their engagement strategies, extending their reach across party lines and committees, given the absence of a clear House Speaker, which may necessitate bipartisan support for legislative progress.
Jamie Dimon - Why Geopolitics is the World’s Biggest Risk
In a recent interview , JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon emphasised that geopolitics, specifically driven by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, now poses the most substantial global risk, surpassing concerns of high inflation or a US recession. Dimon pointed out that the world is currently facing a level of risk that hasn't been seen since World War II. He expressed concerns about the unprecedented level of geopolitical risk, highlighting its potential impact on the global economy. He underlined the gravity of the situation, calling it an inflection point for the future of the free democratic world.
Corporate affairs leaders should adopt a proactive approach. Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities specific to your industry and stay informed about geopolitical developments through reliable sources. Business groups should also reduce their dependency on single suppliers, markets, or regions, create redundancy in critical supply chains, and establish relationships with backup suppliers. ‘Do I have reliant energy lines,’ Dimon asks, ‘do I need semiconductors from China? Where do I get my rare earths from? Ukraine woke everyone up to that and that’s a permanent state of affairs now.’ Additionally, it's crucial for businesses to develop strategies to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on financial stability, monitor exchange rates, and consider diversifying currency holdings. Moreover, maintaining open communication with stakeholders, including investors and policymakers will ensure you are prepared when crises emerge.
UK Party Conferences Season – A Public-Private Partnership?
As the UK's annual party conference season unfolds, featuring gatherings of major political players like the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the Scottish National Party, it's become increasingly apparent that these events hold limited sway over public opinion. While party conferences have traditionally been crucial in shaping party policies, the contemporary focus has shifted towards media spectacle, rather than substantive policy debates. A recent analysis of voting intentions for political parties before and after these conferences reveals that, on average, the impact on public opinion remains marginal. These events are primarily seen as opportunities for leaders to garner media attention and provide a platform for scripted political theatre.
However, this conference season showcases a notable trend – a growing interest from businesses seeking active participation. The number of business groups and charities exhibiting at conferences, particularly at Labour's conference , has risen significantly. Businesses recognise the potential to influence party policies and advocate for their interests, underscoring the evolving role of these conferences in public affairs. Rivalries and policy disputes can dominate the conference landscape, impacting both the atmosphere and the agenda – so flexibility and adaptability are key as business leaders seek to position their organisations favourably with influential party members.
Strategies for Influencing a Disruptive Policyscape
Disruptive innovation revolutionises industries and reshapes the way we live. The interplay between new technologies and the need for stable regulatory frameworks underscores the importance of adopting an agile and adaptable approach to governance. In this article, I’ll explore how policymakers respond to disruptive innovation and how regulatory pressures impact technology adoption and growth. This will allow for a discussion of maturity in the context of public affairs capability, and an exploration of the strategies companies can use to influence a disruptive policyscape.
How Policymakers Respond to Disruptive Innovation
Disruptive innovation presents complex challenges for policymakers by rendering existing regulatory frameworks inadequate or obsolete. The rapid pace of technological change compounds the pressure on policymakers, demanding a deep understanding of cutting-edge advancements and their impact in the public space.
As disruptive technologies continue to emerge, policymakers confront the challenge of nurturing innovation while also mitigating associated risks. The technical challenge in understanding such change, highlights the importance for policymakers to have a deep understanding of underlying mechanisms and the potential consequences for society. Consequently, this pressure encourages policymakers to adapt existing regulatory frameworks, change their approaches, and establish closer ties with industry stakeholders to develop responsive and future-focused regulation.
The ongoing struggle between the dynamic nature of disruptive technologies and the need for stable regulatory structures highlights the necessity of adopting a more agile and adaptable approach to governance. As these challenges persist, it becomes increasingly vital for companies interested in influencing and shaping regulatory frameworks to possess a comprehensive understanding of the strategic options available. This reflects the intricate landscape in which organisations engage with policy and the information environment, ultimately influencing technology adoption and their own growth potential.
How Regulatory Pressures Impact Technology Adoption and Growth
Regulatory pressures play a critical role in shaping technology adoption and growth. Ambiguous or overly restrictive regulations can create uncertainty and hesitancy among businesses and consumer groups, slowing down the adoption curve. This delay can have far-reaching consequences, affecting industries, economies, and society as a whole.
Moreover, regulatory pressures can also hinder the growth of technology sectors. Regulation may introduce red tape or barriers to entry for startups, making it difficult for innovative ideas to take root. This, in turn, can stifle competition and innovation, limiting the potential benefits that new technologies could bring to the market.
However, while regulatory pressures present challenges, they also underscore the necessity for adaptive approaches. Companies and industries that successfully navigate these pressures often employ strategies that go beyond compliance. They engage in proactive collaboration with policymakers, providing valuable insights and expertise to shape the policyscape. By fostering a dialogue between policymakers, innovators and stakeholders, it therefore becomes possible to strike a balance that promotes innovation while also addressing concerns.
Maturity and Public Affairs Capability
Disruptive innovation creates an interesting dynamic within the public policy space. Large technology companies, mature and well-established organisations, possess a substantial advantage with respect to public affairs capability. These industry giants have access to extensive resources, well-established networks, and a wealth of experience in government relations. Their mature status allows them to engage with policymakers effectively, leveraging their financial power, influential connections, and past success in regulatory matters. Such companies can often influence the development of regulations in their favour, shaping the regulatory landscape to accommodate their interests and new business models.
领英推荐
On the other hand, emergent players in the technology sector tend to be smaller, newer entrants who often lack the resources, networks, and experience needed for comprehensive policy engagement. Their public affairs capability is constrained by limited budgets and manpower, making it challenging to compete with the lobbying power of big tech. However, emergent players bring agility, innovation, and disruptive thinking to the table. They are often the driving force behind technological advancements and can swiftly adapt to market changes, staying one step ahead in the regulatory space.
The competitive dynamics between big tech and emergent players are interesting. Regulatory pressures can create opportunities for emergent players to disrupt established markets and challenge the status quo. Smaller companies unburdened by legacy systems or cumbersome bureaucracies can pivot quickly to meet new regulatory requirements or seize untapped markets. This competitive process can lead to market innovation, benefitting consumers and driving industry growth. However, collaboration between mature and emergent companies can also be a powerful force and recognising that they can complement one another's strengths is critical in successful policy intervention. Altogether, this underscores the importance of agility in shaping the policyscape.
Strategies for Influencing a Disruptive Policyscape
Companies involved in disruptive innovation can select targeted strategies to influence the policyscape, encompassing advocacy, information sharing, collaboration, regulatory engagement, and innovation.
Engagement Strategies
Engagement strategies are crucial because they facilitate dialogue and collaboration with key stakeholders, helping to shape policies that align with industry interests and societal needs.
Information Strategies
Information strategies are essential as they equip policymakers with data-driven insights, fostering informed decision-making and the formulation of regulations that encourage innovation and economic growth.
Collaborative Strategies
Collaborative approaches are important because they promote cooperation, transparency, and risk management, which are vital for building trust with regulators and ensuring the responsible adoption of disruptive technologies.
Regulatory Strategies
Regulatory strategies are significant as they enable companies to actively participate in the policymaking process, ensuring that regulations are well-informed, and conducive to innovation while upholding ethical standards.
Innovation Strategies
Innovation strategies are critical because they drive technological advancements, address regulatory challenges, and maintain a competitive edge in rapidly evolving markets, ultimately benefiting both businesses and society as a whole.
By implementing these strategies, companies involved in disruptive technology can proactively shape the policyscape, advocate for favourable regulatory frameworks, and build strong relationships with policymakers to enhance market access and adoption.
Conclusion
Regulatory pressures wield significant influence over technology adoption and growth. Ambiguous or overly restrictive regulations create uncertainty, stalling businesses and stifling innovation. Yet, these pressures also prompt the need for adaptive approaches, where companies collaborate with policymakers to strike a balance between fostering innovation and addressing concerns. This interplay between regulatory pressures and adaptive strategies shapes the competitive dynamics between big tech and emergent players, ultimately highlighting the importance of agility in navigating the evolving policyscape.
Leadership Takeaways
That's it for this week's edition of Inside Corporate Affairs. Subscribe now, and if you like what you read today, please like and share it with your network to help me reach a wider audience. Have a good day, a great week, and I'll see you again soon.
Leiter Kommunikation und Analyse & Mitglied der Gesch?ftsleitung
1 年Thanks Stephen for this comprehensive strategy overview! Perhaps (almost) self-understood, but still worth mentioning: All these strategies don’t/shouldn’t exist in a void, but should be based on a process. Which starts with monitoring the policyscape and establishing PA goals that are aligned with business objectives. As to the latter, a general approach to policy/regulation goal definition is to ask: 1. What do we need to secure our (company’s/products’) license to operate? 2. What do we need to (secure our license to) grow? The latter perhaps being of most importance to innovative (new) companies/industries. Would you agree?
Partner at Anordea | AI Governance and Corporate Affairs for Banking and Financial Services
1 年‘Labour Beats Tories in Conference Battle to Lure Business Exhibitors’ - https://www.ft.com/content/5a2da013-2a2a-4ab8-b8d1-1ab2fdcc6297
Partner at Anordea | AI Governance and Corporate Affairs for Banking and Financial Services
1 年‘Party Conference Season is Here but Decades of Polling Evidence Suggests these Events Barely Move the Dial’ - https://theconversation.com/party-conference-season-is-here-but-decades-of-polling-evidence-suggests-these-events-barely-move-the-dial-214445
Partner at Anordea | AI Governance and Corporate Affairs for Banking and Financial Services
1 年‘We Have Dealt with Recessions Before: Jamie Dimon says Geopolitics is World’s Biggest Risk’ - https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/26/jamie-dimon-says-geopolitics-is-the-worlds-biggest-risk.html
Partner at Anordea | AI Governance and Corporate Affairs for Banking and Financial Services
1 年‘The Rudderless GOP Careens Towards 2024’ - https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/04/republican-party-mccarthy-2024-00119802