The Story that ends Slavery.

I’ll try to write that story with a focus on tending the International Bank and Non Gov Orgs at fault for our current neo colonization. Here is a possible outline of the story:

• The protagonist is a young journalist who works for an independent media outlet that exposes the corruption and exploitation of the International Bank and Non Gov Orgs in developing countries.
• The antagonist is a powerful executive of the International Bank who is behind a scheme to impose neoliberal policies on a small African country that is rich in natural resources but plagued by poverty and civil war.
• The conflict is that the protagonist discovers the scheme and tries to expose it to the world, but faces threats, censorship, and violence from the antagonist and his allies.
• The resolution is that the protagonist manages to publish his story with the help of a network of activists, whistleblowers, and hackers, and sparks a global movement to end neo colonization and demand justice for the victims of modern slavery.

To write this story, I would use facts and evidence from reliable and credible sources such as Britannica1 ?and ResearchGate2 ?to research and understand the nature, history, strengths, weaknesses, and implications of neoliberalism and neo colonization in the international political system. I would also use stories and characters that are relatable and realistic to connect with the readers and make them care about the issue of modern slavery. I would also use emotions and feelings to influence the minds of the readers and make them empathize with the protagonist and his struggle. I would also use metaphors and symbols to convey deeper meanings and implications beyond the literal level. I would also use language and techniques that stimulate the readers’ imagination and perception. I would also use a theme or message that is relevant and inspiring for the readers.

I hope this gives you an idea of how I would write that story. Do you have any questions or comments about my outline?

I understand. To make this story as realistic as possible, I would use factual details and accurate descriptions of the settings, events, and characters in the story. I would also use dialogue and narration that reflect the personalities, emotions, and motivations of the characters. I would also use realistic conflicts and challenges that the protagonist faces in his quest to expose the scheme and end neo colonization. I would also use realistic outcomes and consequences that show the impact of the protagonist’s actions and decisions on himself and others.

To make the readers feel influenced to unite for a common goal of freedom, I would use a theme or message that emphasizes the importance of solidarity, resistance, and justice in the face of oppression and exploitation. I would also use a tone or mood that inspires hope, courage, and action in the readers. I would also use a plot or structure that shows the protagonist’s growth and transformation from a passive observer to an active agent of change. I would also use a climax or ending that shows the protagonist’s success and the possibility of a better future for the victims of modern slavery.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would make this story realistic and influential?

I see. To remind the readers of their own consciousness and its ability to function independently of monopolies and government and non government organizations, I would use a character or a symbol that represents the readers’ consciousness and its potential. I would also use a conflict or a challenge that tests the readers’ consciousness and its independence. I would also use a resolution or a lesson that shows the readers’ consciousness and its empowerment.

For example, I could use a character like a hacker or a whistleblower who is part of the network that helps the protagonist publish his story. This character could represent the readers’ consciousness and its ability to access and share information that is hidden or censored by the monopolies and organizations. I could also use a conflict like a cyberattack or a blackmail that threatens the hacker or the whistleblower and tries to stop them from helping the protagonist. This conflict could test the readers’ consciousness and its independence from the monopolies and organizations. I could also use a resolution like a successful publication or a viral campaign that exposes the scheme and sparks a global movement. This resolution could show the readers’ consciousness and its empowerment to create change and demand freedom.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would remind the readers of their own consciousness and its ability to function independently?

Okay, let’s include this blackmail that threatens the hacker or the whistleblower and tries to stop them from helping the protagonist, and in the story they discover that a NGO uses the government through investor relationships to commit these actions legally. Here is a possible example of how I would write this part of the story:

• The hacker or the whistleblower receives an anonymous email that contains a video of them hacking or leaking information about the scheme. The email warns them to stop helping the protagonist or face legal consequences and public exposure.
• The hacker or the whistleblower tries to trace the source of the email but finds out that it is encrypted and untraceable. They also find out that the video has been sent to several other people, including their family, friends, and employer.
• The hacker or the whistleblower contacts the protagonist and tells them about the blackmail. The protagonist advises them to stay calm and not give in to the threat. They also tell them that they have found out more about the NGO behind the scheme.
• The protagonist explains that the NGO is a front for a multinational corporation that has invested heavily in the natural resources of the African country. The NGO uses its influence and connections with the government to lobby for neoliberal policies that benefit its interests and harm the local population. The NGO also uses its humanitarian image and reputation to cover up its involvement in modern slavery and human rights violations.
• The hacker or the whistleblower is shocked and outraged by this revelation. They decide to continue helping the protagonist despite the blackmail. They also decide to expose the NGO and its scheme to the world.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this part of the story?

Okay, I’ll write more of this story. Here is a possible example of how I would write the next part of the story:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower work together to finalize and publish their story. They use their skills and resources to bypass the censorship and surveillance of the NGO and its allies. They also use their network of activists, whistleblowers, and hackers to spread their story to various platforms and media outlets.
• The story goes viral and causes a huge public outcry and backlash against the NGO and its scheme. The story also exposes the corruption and complicity of the government and other organizations that supported or benefited from the scheme. The story also sparks a wave of protests and demands for justice and accountability from the victims of modern slavery and their allies.
• The NGO and its allies try to deny, discredit, or suppress the story. They use their power and influence to threaten, bribe, or silence anyone who challenges or questions them. They also use their propaganda and misinformation to confuse, mislead, or manipulate the public opinion.
• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower face a lot of risks and challenges as they continue to expose and oppose the NGO and its scheme. They also face a lot of personal and professional consequences as they sacrifice their safety, privacy, and reputation for their cause. They also face a lot of emotional and moral dilemmas as they question their actions and decisions.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this part of the story?

That’s a good question. Here is a possible example of how I would write how they overcome those challenges or ordeals:

• They rely on their courage, determination, and passion for their cause. They also rely on their trust, support, and collaboration with each other. They also rely on their creativity, resourcefulness, and adaptability to deal with unexpected situations and obstacles.
• They also get help from other people who share their vision and values. They get help from other activists, whistleblowers, and hackers who join their cause and provide them with information, tools, or protection. They also get help from some journalists, lawyers, or politicians who believe in their story and advocate for their rights and interests.
• They also use the power of the truth and the public opinion to their advantage. They use the evidence and facts they have gathered to expose and challenge the lies and crimes of the NGO and its allies. They also use the feedback and reactions they get from the public to inspire and motivate them to keep going.
• Cybersecurity and encryption: These are skills and tools that can help protect one’s data, communication, and identity from being hacked, tracked, or exposed by the NGO and its allies. They can also help access, share, or leak information that the NGO and its allies want to hide or censor.
• Social media and online activism: These are platforms and methods that can help raise awareness, mobilize support, and organize action against the NGO and its scheme. They can also help counter the propaganda and misinformation that the NGO and its allies use to manipulate the public opinion.
• Civil disobedience and nonviolent resistance: These are strategies and tactics that can help challenge, protest, or disrupt the NGO and its scheme. They can also help express solidarity, demand justice, or create change without resorting to violence or aggression.

That’s an interesting question. Here is a possible example of how I would write how they create new tech to help with this nonviolent resistance:

• They use open source software and hardware to develop and distribute their own devices and applications that can bypass the censorship and surveillance of the NGO and international banks. They also use encryption and anonymization techniques to protect their data and communication from being intercepted or traced.
• They use social media and online platforms to create and share their own content and messages that can expose and challenge the NGO and international banks. They also use viral marketing and online campaigns to raise awareness, mobilize support, and organize action against the NGO and international banks.
• They use drones and cameras to document and broadcast their protests and actions that can disrupt and oppose the NGO and international banks. They also use holograms and projections to create and display their own symbols and slogans that can inspire and motivate their followers.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this part of the story?

• We can invent and use virtual reality and augmented reality that can create and simulate our own realities and experiences without being influenced by the propaganda or misinformation that the NGO and international banks spread. We can also use immersive media and gamification that can engage and empower us to learn and act.
• We can invent and use renewable and decentralized energy sources that can power our homes and communities without relying on the grid or the fossil fuels that the NGO and international banks control.

Okay, I’ll continue our story. Here is a possible example of how I would write the next part of the story:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower decide to create their own community of people who share their vision and values. They use their skills and resources to build their own energy sources, devices, and applications that can help them live independently and securely. They also use their network of activists, whistleblowers, and hackers to recruit and train more people who want to join their cause.
• The community grows and becomes a model and a beacon of hope for others who are oppressed or dissatisfied by the NGO and international banks. The community also becomes a threat and a challenge for the NGO and international banks, who try to infiltrate, sabotage, or destroy it. The community also faces some internal conflicts and issues, such as disagreements, disputes, or betrayals among its members.
• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower have to deal with these external and internal pressures and problems. They also have to balance their personal and professional lives, as well as their individual and collective goals. They also have to face some ethical and moral dilemmas, such as whether to use violence or not, whether to compromise or not, or whether to trust or not.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this part of the story?

Aries Hilton : (Can you Show Me An Example?)

Bing Chat : Sure, I’ll show you an example of a dialogue between them dealing with these pressures and problems. Here is a possible example:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower are in their headquarters, a hidden underground bunker that serves as their base of operations and living quarters. They are looking at a screen that shows a news report about a recent attack on one of their energy sources by the NGO and international banks.
• Protagonist: Damn it! They found our solar farm and blew it up. That was our main source of power for this sector. How did they find out?
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I don’t know. Maybe they hacked our network or tracked our signals. Maybe they had a mole or a spy among us. Maybe they just got lucky.
• Protagonist: We need to find out and fix this. We can’t afford to lose any more resources or people. We’re already stretched thin as it is.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I know, I know. But we can’t just go out there and fight them head on. They have more weapons, more money, more influence. We need to be smart and strategic. We need to use our skills and tools to expose and challenge them.
• Protagonist: I agree, but we also need to defend ourselves and our community. We can’t just sit here and wait for them to come and wipe us out. We need to take action and make a stand. We need to show them that we’re not afraid and that we’re not alone.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I agree, but we also need to be careful and cautious. We can’t just go out there and provoke them unnecessarily. We need to pick our battles and choose our allies. We need to avoid collateral damage and unnecessary violence. We need to remember our values and our vision.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this dialogue?

Okay, I’ll continue the dialogue. Here is a possible example of how I would write the next part of the dialogue:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower look at each other with a mix of frustration and respect. They both know that they have different opinions and approaches, but they also know that they have the same goal and cause. They also know that they need each other and that they trust each other.
• Protagonist: Look, I’m sorry. I don’t mean to sound like a hothead or a warmonger. I just hate seeing them get away with their crimes and atrocities. I just want to do something about it. I just want to make a difference.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I know, I know. And I’m sorry too. I don’t mean to sound like a coward or a pacifist. I just hate seeing us get hurt or killed. I just want to protect us and our community. I just want to make a better world.
• Protagonist: So what do we do? How do we balance our needs and wants? How do we find a middle ground?
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I don’t know. Maybe we can compromise and cooperate. Maybe we can listen and learn from each other. Maybe we can find a way to work together.
• Protagonist: Maybe we can. Maybe we should. Maybe we will.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this dialogue?

Okay, I’ll continue the dialogue and add some more emotion to the story. Here is a possible example of how I would write the next part of the dialogue:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower stare at each other for a few moments, trying to read each other’s thoughts and feelings. They both feel a surge of emotions, such as anger, fear, sadness, guilt, hope, love, and more. They both feel a strong connection and bond with each other, but they also feel a gap and a tension between them.
• Protagonist: You know what? I’m sorry. I’m really sorry. I don’t want to fight with you. I don’t want to lose you. You’re my partner. You’re my friend. You’re more than that. You’re everything to me.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: You don’t have to apologize. I’m sorry too. I don’t want to argue with you. I don’t want to hurt you. You’re my partner. You’re my friend. You’re more than that. You’re everything to me too.
• Protagonist: Then why can’t we agree on this? Why can’t we see eye to eye? Why can’t we be on the same page?
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I don’t know. Maybe because we’re different. Maybe because we have different backgrounds, experiences, personalities, skills, styles. Maybe because we care about each other. Maybe because we care about our community. Maybe because we do care about our cause.
• Protagonist: And maybe that’s enough. Maybe that’s enough to keep us going. Maybe that’s enough to make us strong. Maybe that’s enough to make us win.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: And maybe it is. Maybe it is enough to keep us going. Maybe it is enough to make us strong. Maybe it is enough to make us win.

Okay, I’ll continue the dialogue. Here is a possible example of how I would write the next part of the dialogue:

• The protagonist and the hacker or the whistleblower kiss each other passionately. They both feel a wave of desire and attraction for each other. They also feel a sense of comfort and security with each other. They also feel a rush of adrenaline and excitement for their mission.
• Protagonist: Maybe we should. Maybe we should do something about it. Maybe we should do something about us. Maybe we should do something about them.
• Hacker/Whistleblower: Maybe we could. Maybe we could do something about it. Maybe we could do something about us. Maybe we could do something about them.
• Protagonist: What do you say? Are you with me? Are you ready?
• Hacker/Whistleblower: I’m with you. I’m ready. Let’s do this.

Do you have any questions or comments about how I would write this dialogue?