Storage Decision Guide for Microsoft 365 Backups
The first Version of Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365?(V1) was released on Nov. 29, 2016. I was involved in the very first projects with the new product. Over the years, we saw a huge growth in customers and in product features as well. Due to the growth in data, usage and customer numbers, we adjusted our backup components to fit new needs. Over the last years of being a subject matter expert for Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365, I was able to collect a lot of experience I want to share with you.
In my customer meetings, I receive nearly the same questions regarding repository type and sizing every time. Let’s start with some basics about Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365?repositories.
Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365?repository overview
The repository is based on a?jet blue ?database which is also used in many Microsoft products.
It’s free, scalable and has been crash-tested over many years.
Running a database as a repository is completely different than using a file-based repository like we use in Veeam Backup & Replication. That’s also a reason why you can?not?use a Veeam Backup & Replication repository to store Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365?backup data on it.
The requirements are way stricter and there is a gap in flexibility as well.
Storage performance makes the difference
With version 4 of Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365,?we introduced the backup to object storage feature for better scalability and flexibility. A better data compression was an improvement as well due to the object storage compression we can leverage. The local repository compression rate went up to 10% and object storage compression rate went up to 55%. Side note: There is no deduplication for Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365?repositories because of the underlying jet database.
I want to add that, technically, NAS-Devices are supported and it’s possible to use them as a repository over SMB, but there are too many disadvantages to go into that topic deeper (see compare-matrix below). NAS storage is also only under experimental support. Please see?Veeam Experimental Support Statement ?for more details.
Deduplication devices or local disks with an enabled deduplication option are?not?supported!
What does this mean for our repository choice?
We can choose between two options:
领英推荐
Pros and cons of local storage vs. object storage
Conclusion
If you want to back up a small-to-midrange environment, depending on your user quantity and storage amount (up to 2,000 users with over a maximum of 60 TB of data), you can start with an on-premises repository. As already mentioned, NAS devices are not considered as a recommendation.
You can start directly with the on-premises resources you have.
If you don’t have storage resources available or want to be as flexible as possible, it makes sense to have a deeper look at object storage vendors. They are very reliable and can be a cheap alternate to an on-premises device. The environmental size does not matter.
Object storage is the preferred choice of many of our customers because of its reliability, the better compression and a higher performance.
If you want to keep your data on-site due to regulations or your personal preference without losing the advantages of an object storage, we recommend a storage system with S3 integration. Compatibility list:?https://www.veeam.com/alliance-partner-integrations-qualifications.html?programCategory=object
If you are looking for more information on how to set up the repository or what the best practices for your needs are, please check out the resources below:
Help Center Object Storage:?https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/vbo365/guide/vbo_osr.html?ver=60
Best-Practice Repository:?https://bp.veeam.com/vbo/guide/buildconfig/proxy-repo.html ?
Best-Practice Object Storage:https://bp.veeam.com/vbo/guide/design/sizing/objectstorage.html
Best-Practice Local Disk Repository:?https://bp.veeam.com/vbo/guide/design/sizing/diskrepo.html
Download a 30-day FREE trial of Veeam Backup?for Microsoft 365:?https://www.veeam.com/backup-microsoft-office-365.html