Stop Writing Positive Articles: What 1,000 Articles Reveal About Reader Engagement
Ritesh Kanjee
Making Business Easier with AI. Director | AI Innovator | Consultant at Augmented AI
Hey, what’s up, everyone? Ritz here, and today we’re diving into a topic that’s going to flip your content strategy on its head. We’re talking about why you should stop writing positive articles and what 1,000 articles reveal about reader engagement. Spoiler alert: negativity might just be your new best friend.
The Journey?Begins
So, here’s the deal. As a business owner, I’ve got a lot on my plate?—?projects to manage, salaries to pay, and content to create. You know the drill. But I realized I was spending too much time working in my business rather than on it. That’s when I stumbled upon the world of AI in business. And let me tell you, it’s like discovering that your toaster can also make coffee. Mind-blowing, right?
The Experiment
I decided to put my engineering brain to work and dive into some data analysis. With the help of OpenAI’s o1-preview, I scraped over 1,000 articles on Medium to see what makes them tick. The goal? To find out how sentiment and emotional appeal in headlines affect reader engagement. And boy, did we find some interesting stuff.
Headline and Hook?Analysis
First up, we looked at how different headline formats influence engagement. Headlines are like the front door to your article?—?if they’re not inviting, no one’s coming in. We analyzed formats like lists, questions, and “how-to” guides, and applied sentiment analysis to measure emotional appeal. Turns out, the more provocative and emotionally charged the headline, the better the engagement.
Sentiment and Emotional Appeal
Now, here’s where it gets juicy. We focused on the emotional tone of both headlines and body text. Positive, negative, or neutral?—?what’s the secret sauce? The results were clear: negative sentiment headlines outperformed positive and neutral ones by almost three times. Yeah, you heard that right. Negativity sells.
Why Negativity Works
So, why does negativity work? It’s all about evoking strong emotions like anxiety, frustration, curiosity, and fear. These emotions drive engagement because they tap into our natural instincts. Think about it?—?when was the last time you clicked on an article titled “Everything is Perfect and Nothing is Wrong”? Exactly.
Crafting the Perfect?Headline
Let’s break down the elements of a killer headline:
Proposed Template for Future?Articles
To help you craft headlines that resonate, here’s a template you can use:
Examples Using the?Template
Let’s see these templates in action:
The Problem
Alright, let’s wrap this up with a problem for you to ponder. If negative headlines drive engagement, how do we balance this with maintaining a positive brand image? It’s a tightrope walk, but one worth mastering.
And hey, if you’re interested in diving deeper into optimizing your business with AI, I’m putting together an AI Business Systems Handbook. It’ll be packed with insights and experiments, and you can download it for free when it’s ready. So, join me on this journey.
If you want access to the dataset and hook generator I used, drop a comment below. Let’s keep this conversation going. Until next time, keep questioning, keep experimenting, and keep pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.
Technology Innovation, Startup Creation, Operation and much fun, laughter and learning along the way. ????????????
2 周Personally, I abhor negativity and delete people who exhibit such behavior. Why? I do not want to engage in negativity and critique. My sense is that you are correct that negativity does create a reaction. There is a lot of data to support your conclusion; however, that is not a reaction I personally wish to typically create. A secondary aspect here is that your proposed action will create a reaction in your audience. It will drive people to be more controversial, establishing a negative reward cycle. Such systems tend to backfire as they scale. This results in pillarism, which is a social or political structure where society is divided into separate groups or “pillars” based on different ideologies, religions, or political affiliations. Each pillar functions autonomously with its institutions, including schools, media, and social organizations, while coexisting within a larger political entity. The outcome is division and a collapse of social cohesion.
Experienced Project Manager | Business Events & Hospitality Enthusiast | Client Experience Advocate
2 周Love the thinking and agree, thank you