The Stats Behind 0 for 27

The Stats Behind 0 for 27

For those who are not aware, last night in game 7 of the Western Conference finals, the Rockets combined to shoot 0 for 27 on three point attempts from midway through the second quarter into the fourth quarter (including James Harden shooting 0 for 10).

What are the odds of that?! Let's use this as an opportunity to utilize some basic statistics.

The math behind determining the probability of shooting 0 for 27 from three is easy enough, but requires a basic assumption. Each shot needs to be considered one "trial" with a certain success rate. The 27 missed three point attempts were taken by the following players with their season three point field goal percentages in parentheses:

  • 10 - James Harden (36.7%)
  • 7 - Eric Gordon (35.9%)
  • 6 - Trevor Ariza (36.8%)
  • 2 - PJ Tucker (37.1%)
  • 1 - Joe Johnson (27.9%)
  • 1 - Gerald Green (36.9%)

The probability of any single player missing "x" number of shots in a row can be calculated by successively multiplying the complement of their three point percentage. For example, the probability of PJ Tucker missing two three point shots in a row can be calculated as follows:

P(PJ Tucker 0 for 2) = (1 - 3FG%)(1 - 3FG%) = (1 - 0.371)^(2) = 39.6%

What about James Harden missing 10 successive shots?

P(James Harden 0 for 10) = (1 - 3FG%)^10 = (1 - 0.367)^(10) = 1.03%

There was about a 1% chance for James Harden to miss 10 shots in a row. In order to calculate the total probability of the Rockets shooting 0 for 27, the probability of each individual player missing their number of successive shots must be calculated. After the probabilities have been calculated for each player then the probability of 0 for 27 can be calculated by multiplying the probabilities:

P(Rockets 0 for 27) = P(J. Harden 0 for 10)*P(E. Gordon 0 for 7)*P(T. Ariza 0 for 6)*P(PJ Tucker 0 for 2)*(J. Johnson 0 for 1)*P(G. Green 0 for 1)

The probability of the Rockets shooting 0 for 27 was 0.00053% or 1 in 190,220! As a somewhat helpful point of reference, the odds of getting struck by lighting in your lifetime are about 1 in 3,000 (Nat. Geographic).

Bowman Bagley

CEO, Advanced BioMatrix - Investor

6 年

It would be interesting to dive deeper and look at 3pt% when shots are contested, vs open shots, one dribble, etc... Somehow factor in defense as a contributor. Fun analysis though!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Matt Anderson, PE的更多文章

  • Congestion Control is the Friction of the Internet

    Congestion Control is the Friction of the Internet

    I recently took a Network Engineering class, and as a refinery process engineer, I could not help but see the flow of…

    3 条评论
  • The Future of Refinery Analytics

    The Future of Refinery Analytics

    AWS (Amazon Web Services) is a cloud computing powerhouse. SEEQ, is a relatively new technology company (founded in…

    5 条评论
  • Three Inspection Methods Every Process Engineer Should Know

    Three Inspection Methods Every Process Engineer Should Know

    Let me start with a disclaimer that I am not an inspection expert. However, process engineers work closely with…

    5 条评论
  • Try A Checklist

    Try A Checklist

    ThinkReliability states on their website that they focus "on solving problems and improving business processes"…

  • Five Recommendations for Incoming Downstream Interns

    Five Recommendations for Incoming Downstream Interns

    It's the end of January, and the Spring semester is in full swing. For many chemical engineering students, the end of…

    11 条评论
  • Fourier's Law and Home Heating Bills

    Fourier's Law and Home Heating Bills

    In 1798, Napoleon Bonaparte was in Cairo, trapped with his army thanks to the blockading British Fleet. Fortunately…

  • Process Safety & Blame

    Process Safety & Blame

    James Reason wrote "The Human Contribution" about the philosophy of error surrounding tightly coupled complex…

    1 条评论
  • How to Measure Fluid Flowrates

    How to Measure Fluid Flowrates

    The intended audience of this article is anyone with even a tenuous interest in fluid mechanics. Alternatively, if you…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了