The statistical power of n=1
Adonis Maiquez, MD, ABAARM
Helping people find the root causes of every health issues, correct them, so they can improve their Life! DrAdonis.com Functional and Regenerative Medicine / Medicina Funcional y Regenerativa at Dr. Adonis
It might seem a discrepancy (and it actually s) but my point is well intentioned. Have you had patients or clients (medical, dietitian, sports) who have improved with a measure that you then apply to other patients/clients?. Well, that is applying a result of a sample of 1 (n=1) to the rest of your population. That is against the "evidence-based" modern concept of results application. It has worked in my practice (and in myself and family and friends). I would like to know your opinion in the topic. What is "evidence-based" for you (not the book description, but how do you interpret and apply in your practice/job/studio)
In Health and Love,
Dr. Adonis
Executive, Operating Partner,Consultant, Clinician, Author, Professor, Board Member, Investor, Entrepreneur
8 年Clinical expertease, client perspective and best evidence (no doubt,we would love best research proven external scientific evidence)
Integrative Personalized Women's Health | Functional Genomics Consultant | Assoc Publisher, Women's Health Digest
8 年The current model of "evidence-based" treatments is largely based on pharmaceutical and epidemiological studies. Any practitioner knows the limitations of this approach because we treat individuals-- not populations. We are each unique. This is why I incorporate genomics into my practice- helps me refine the N of 1 with scientifically based data that applies to the individual.