Strongly Denouncing Japan's Discharge of Nuclear Wastewater into the Ocean
Dr Cheung H.F., Jackie
iTec Education & Managenent Consultancy Managing Director
Today marks the commencement of Japan's continual release of Fukushima nuclear wastewater, a prospect destined to inflict immeasurable calamity.
?
Chinese scholars have forewarned that this radioactive waste will inevitably reach the Chinese coastline within a span of 240 days, gesturing towards the North American shores within a period of 1,200 days, thereby enveloping a significant portion of the North Pacific. Astonishingly, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) asserts that the concentration of tritium in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant's wastewater falls drastically below the stipulated discharge standard of 1,500 becquerels per liter, measuring between a meager 43 and 63 becquerels per liter. TEPCO further claims that the prevailing weather conditions remain inconsequential to the safety of this endeavor. More disconcertingly, TEPCO intends to discharge an initial volume of approximately 7,800 tons of wastewater, with an overarching objective of releasing a total estimate of 1.34 million tons within a three-decade timeframe. Experts consistently raise distressing concerns about discharging radioactive substances into the ocean, emphasizing the long-term ramifications of carbon-14 and iodine-129 accumulation within marine organisms, extending beyond mere tritium. Gao Zhiguo, President of the China Society of the Law of the Sea and a former judge at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, asserts that the international community's paramount apprehension lies in the influx of nuclear radioactive elements and substances into the ocean. Japan, however, propagates a misleading narrative, directing attention solely towards tritium. In stark contrast, numerous scientists worldwide have reached a unanimous consensus, indicating that nuclear wastewater harbors up to 64 distinct radioactive elements, with over 70% of these elements surpassing safety thresholds, thus rendering comprehensive treatment by multi-nuclide processing facilities an arduous task.
?
领英推荐
Additionally, the Japanese fishing industry firmly opposes the discharge of nuclear wastewater in the absence of comprehensive comprehension and endorsement from industry professionals and the public. Japan's justification predominantly revolves around cost-effectiveness, a profoundly irresponsible and audacious governmental inclination.
?
As conscientious global citizens, we must collectively rise against Japan's unfettered release of nuclear wastewater into the ocean. The potential perils associated with this discharge cannot be dismissed, for they not only jeopardize human well-being but also imperil the global marine ecosystem, potentially culminating in an unparalleled man-made catastrophe. Let us unify our voices and refuse Japan's embrace of this reckless practice, steadfastly safeguarding the sanctity of our shared planetary abode.
CCTEG International Engineering Company -International Sales Manager/English<>Chinese Interpreter
1 年The water discharged from Fukushima is Nuclear Contaminated Water, not nuclear waste water. Nuclear Contaminated Water has contacted with the nuclear material. Nuclear waste water has not. Many people has been cheated by Japanese.