Stateful vs Stateless Authentication
Authentication is at the core of securing applications. When you build APIs or web applications, you need to decide how to handle authentication.
Two popular approaches are stateful and stateless authentication. Let’s break down what they mean and how they differ technically.
1. What is Stateful Authentication?
Imagine you went to your regular Kirana (local grocery) shop. The shopkeeper knows you. Every time you walk in, he remembers your usual purchases and how you pay. He might even extend credit because he remembers your transaction history and trustworthiness. This is a stateful system. one that keeps track of your past interactions and uses that information to provide a better, more personalized experience.
How it Works:
Example:
When you log into a website, the server creates a session on the backend (stateful). You receive a session cookie, and every time you make a request (like navigating to another page), the session ID from the cookie is sent. The server then checks the session and gives you access to protected resources.
Pros:
Since the server keeps track of the session, it’s easy to manage things like user-specific data (shopping carts, user profiles, etc.).
You can easily log out users by removing their session from the server.
Cons:
Scalability issues: Storing session data on the server consumes resources (RAM or DB).
In a distributed system with multiple servers, sessions must either be shared across all servers or stored centrally, adding complexity.
2. What is Stateless Authentication?
Stateless authentication is like going to a street vendor and purchasing something, he doesn't know what items do you like or what is use payment preference and you have to tell him/her what you need on every visit. This is the same way how Stateless authentication works.
In stateless authentication, the server doesn’t store any information about the user after they log in. Instead, all the necessary user information is stored in the token (usually a JWT—JSON Web Token) that the client holds.
How it Works:
Example:
When using stateless authentication, after login, the server gives you a signed JWT token. This token is stored client-side (usually in local Storage or a cookie). For every API request, this token is included in the headers, and the server validates it on the fly.
Pros:
Highly scalable: Since no session is stored on the server, multiple servers can independently handle requests (no need for central session management).
领英推荐
Ideal for distributed or microservices architectures.
Cons:
Since the server doesn’t manage the session, logging out users is more complicated (you can't just remove a session from the server).
Tokens can grow in size depending on the amount of information they contain, making them slightly heavier to pass with each request.
Scenario Based Example
Stateful Authentication Example: Bank Portal
This way bank can prohibit multiple sessions of a user and can invalidate the other session
Stateless Authentication Example: News Website
Since controlling the user from the server is not necessary, JWT/Stateless mechanism can work perfectly.
Technical Differences:
Stateful Authentication:
Stateless Authentication:
Conclusion:
Both stateful and stateless authentication have their use cases. Stateful authentication offers simplicity in having server side control over user sessions but can hit scaling issues. Stateless authentication, using tokens like JWT, is more scalable and ideal for modern, distributed systems.
Your choice should depend on your app’s architecture, security requirements, performance needs, and scalability goals.