Startup GTM Mistakes and how to Avoid Them: Part 5 of 5

Startup GTM Mistakes and how to Avoid Them: Part 5 of 5

Instead of: Staying the course on _______ because you’ve already invested a lot into it (time, money, headcount…)

Try this instead: Beware of the sunk cost fallacy and flex your #1 advantage as a startup - be nimble!

Everyone who works in early-stage tech is obsessed with building and growing things. Even the vernacular in our industry (“seed” rounds, “incubators”, “accelerators”) all foster this idea of cultivation. No wonder it’s so difficult to abort projects, change direction or just admit that something that we once believed in strongly, now plain isn’t working or doesn’t make sense like it did when we started.

This may be the toughest one on the list. The earlier your business, the more likely this is to affect you. Early-stage commercialization tends to be a series of hypotheses and experiments, and as such, should be expected to yield mixed results, with some things working and others, well, failing. As the startup halls of wisdom often preach, “focus is key / not being focused is a death sentence” so having the discipline, rigor and quite frankly, the courage to kill a product or strategy that isn’t working is vital.??

Here’s an example: As an early stage founder, you raised early stage capital from some great investors, with the thesis that you would find Product Market Fit (PMF) using a direct-to-consumer sales model that would eventually mature into a channel strategy.? However, in the subsequent years, due to changes in the market, competitive landscape and new data from early beta tests, this is looking increasingly like the wrong strategy.

In this scenario, there are some very difficult decisions to be made which will have a profound impact on your company, employees, customers, product and financials.? The lesson here is that change is hard and admitting you were wrong is hard (or at least, it was for me). As an startup founder however, you do have a remarkable advantage: the ability to move quickly, to course-correct and to re-think your strategy.??

The decision of “what to kill and what to keep” is often the difference between success and failure.

If you're enjoying the topic and want to learn more, check out?Part 1 , Part 2 ,?Part 3 ?and?Part 4 .

Michael Ho

Series A prep for seed stage founders | former VC & exited founder | Click 'visit my website' to register for my next free Seed to Series A live training session ??

1 年

This is so true Shawn ?? It took us 7 years to revisit one of our core assumptions. Once we did, we made a slight shift and then sold the company shortly after. Since then I've found a question to continually ask yourself is "what's changed" and periodically take a step back to revisit even your core assumptions.

Blair Carey, CFA

Creating Predictable Proven Revenue Processes Daily

1 年

So, so true.... At some point resilience and persistence become obstinance.

Louis Garceau

Planification Stratégique - Strategic Planning

1 年

Shawn Chance We have this dilemna currently with one of our product ... timely content! thanks.

Shawn Chance - great series and I can’t help but read a little ClearEstate in it!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了