The Quadruple Aim: A Square Deal for Clinicians (& Patients)

The Quadruple Aim: A Square Deal for Clinicians (& Patients)

I've had the opportunity to visit hundreds of clinics and hospitals which has afforded me the chance to speak with clinicians of all types (doctors, nurses, techs, etc.). Most of my recent visits have been to the highest performing organizations where the physician satisfaction was a stark contrast to the 2012 study that found that 9 out of 10 physicians across the country are unwilling to recommend the profession to others. My unscientific observation was that the organizations that were performing the best on clinical measures consistently had the most professionally satisfied clinicians. Unsurprisingly, the revolution to reinvent healthcare is being led by doctors.

These are the organizations that realized how horrible the status quo is for clinicians and patients alike. This is why they have contributed to the various elements of the Health Rosetta best practices (how to purchase healthcare services wisely) and Health Rosetta Principles (guiding principles for how health-related organizations succeed in the new health ecosystem) that lay out the blueprint for where healthcare should be headed.

From a practical perspective, I don't believe many of the changes foisted on clinicians today are sustainable. Layering more stuff on top of a clearly-broken process isn't the path to success. This approach breaks the first rule I learned as a new consultant fresh out of college: Always fix a process before adding technology. Sadly, healthcare is riddled with technology being dumped on top of broken processes.

The question for me became whether there was data to back up my observations. It turns out there is some data (H/T Dr. Annie Valente for sharing that report). The Lancet reported on this recently.

When physicians are unwell, the performance of health-care systems can be sub-optimum. Physician wellness might not only benefit the individual physician, it could also be vital to the delivery of high-quality health care. We review the work stresses faced by physicians, the barriers to attending to wellness, and the consequences of unwell physicians to the individual and to health-care systems. We show that health systems should routinely measure physician wellness, and discuss the challenges associated with implementation.

In parallel, I began hearing Dr. Rushika Fernandopulle talking about the Quadruple Aim. Given Iora Health's success (read more here) and the opportunity to learn from Tony Hsieh's organization, it made logical sense. Naturally, a professionally satisfied and challenged clinician is going to perform better. This has led to call by The Annals of Family Medicine to extend the Triple Aim to the Quadruple Aim. They summarized the article as follows:

The Triple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing costs—is widely accepted as a compass to optimize health system performance. Yet physicians and other members of the health care workforce report widespread burnout and dissatisfaction. Burnout is associated with lower patient satisfaction, reduced health outcomes, and it may increase costs. Burnout thus imperils the Triple Aim. This article recommends that the Triple Aim be expanded to a Quadruple Aim, adding the goal of improving the work life of health care providers, including clinicians and staff.

It's common sense that an improved care team experience (note that the care team includes both professional and non-professional members of the care team such as family caregivers) naturally leads to an improved patient experience. That's when the "magic" happens of a partnership between the care team and the patient that naturally leads to improved health outcomes. In the proper model, that leads to reduced costs.

As Teddy Roosevelt would have said, extending the "aims" to the fourth aim is the Square Deal that benefits all parties.

Related article: The Doctor Dropout Drug

__________

Dave Chase is the co-founder of the Health Rosetta (a LEED-like organization for healthcare), and author of the book, “The Opioid Crisis Wake-up Call: Health Care is Stealing the American Dream. Here's How We Take it Back.” Follow the link to the book for a free download of the book. Chase's TEDx talk was entitled "Healthcare stole the American Dream -- here's how we take it back." See the Health Rosetta website for how to get involved, resources and how to join others to support its mission.

Subscribe to the Health Rosetta newsletter to help transform healthcare and to stay ahead of healthcare changes. Follow Dave on Twitter

Stephen C Schimpff MD MACP

Retired Academic Health Center CEO, Professor of Medicine and Healthcare Author

8 年

There is a lot of valuable info here but the key line to me is this: "I don't believe many of the changes foisted on clinicians today are sustainable" Dave is correct and slowly but surely the medical profession is deciding to take on the issue and make transformational changes.

Ashok Nare

Technologist | Entrepreneur | Speaker | Innovator - Helping organizations become Agile, Data-Driven and Software-Powered

8 年

Sorry for a delayed contribution -- but just ran into this article and wanted to share my thoughts as a consumer of the health care system and as a digital health entrepreneur that is trying to address similar issues. I fully agree with the spirit of Quadruple Aim as outlined in the post and many comments/feedback posted in response. This became all the more real and obvious to me over the past one year as I spoke to more and more physicians, nurses and health care providers not only in U.S. but in other developing countries. All the doctors I know work long hours and the level of burn out is even more palpable in surgeons performing multiple surgeries a day. As a consumer, I am certainly all for patient centric solutions -- but I wouldn't want to get operated on by a tired surgeon. I am a firm believer in digital health technologies helping to move the ball forward in the right direction and help alleviate this to some extent - but digital health initiatives will only be successful if they are addressing the needs of key stakeholders at both ends of the healthcare spectrum - patients and care providers. I see a lot of patient centric solutions in the market but not sure if some of them are optimal solutions if the care provider is not part of the solution. Having said that, it's great that we are having a conversation about all stakeholders in the system as they are indeed multiple stakeholders in healthcare compared to many other industries. I think any digital health solution should consider the needs, pain points and workflow issues on both sides -- improve health outcomes of patients, while expanding the reach, capability and efficiency of the care providers.

Melissa Agresti, RN

Nurse/Practice Administrator at Advocare Cornerstone Pediatrics

8 年

Many providers deal with the struggles of trying to stay independent of the the healthcare systems in addition to incorporating all the necessary evidence based practice to achieve triple aim. Providers are becoming overwhelmed with trying to keep up with the technology, data and learning curve of transitioning from fee for service to value based. Although all our work is patient centric, it is only as good as the provider delivering the care. Quadruple aim is a must!!

Miguel Madero

Tech, bio and health entrepreneur/investor

8 年

I have been thinking about this for a while now. It's good to put a name to it, makes things easier when we form a common vocabulary.

Christos A. Galanopoulos MD, MBA, MSc, FACS

VP Renown Health, Chairman Department of Surgery at Renown Health

8 年

Very insightful- and an obviously unmet challenge.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了