Sponsorship – is it truly the linchpin of successful change or simply one of several "foundational" elements

The Role of Sponsorship in Change Management Success

Sponsorship is often positioned as the top driver for successful change, and there's substantial data to back this claim. Studies, including Prosci’s benchmarking reports, consistently point to an active, visible, and involved sponsor as the most critical factor in achieving successful outcomes. Sponsors can influence decision-making, secure necessary resources, and act as the visible face of the change, giving the initiative credibility.

From my perspective, while it's hard to argue against the statistical evidence, it's worth questioning if sponsorship is truly the linchpin of successful change or simply one of several critical elements. In fact, over-emphasising sponsorship might obscure the fact that other factors like communication and stakeholder engagement play equally pivotal roles. I'd argue that change success is more holistic and complex than one dominant factor.

Why Sponsorship Matters

A sponsor who is visible and engaged gives weight to the change initiative. Their role is not just symbolic; they often hold the purse strings, influence corporate priorities, and have the authority to knock down barriers. When employees see the senior leadership taking a personal interest in the success of a project, it sends a signal that the initiative is a priority for the entire organization.

Key impacts of effective sponsorship:

However, sponsorship's impact is only as good as the sponsor's actions. A sponsor who delegates their responsibility or is merely a figurehead might have little impact, regardless of how critical their role is perceived to be. In fact, in many cases, a weak or absent sponsor can be offset by strong communication, stakeholder engagement, or grassroots support from middle management.

Other Key Factors Contributing to Change Success

While sponsorship often takes the spotlight, several other activities contribute to the success of change initiatives. These elements should be considered in combination with sponsorship to ensure that a change initiative is holistic and resilient. Below, I’ve ranked them in order of importance:

Change happens at the individual level, and engaging with stakeholders is crucial for adoption. If the people affected by the change are not engaged, motivated, or prepared to change, the initiative is likely to fail—no matter how strong the sponsor is.

Stakeholder engagement includes understanding who will be impacted, their concerns, and how best to communicate and work with them. Effective engagement helps overcome resistance, builds trust, and ensures that key players are aligned with the goals of the change.

Impact: Properly engaged stakeholders act as ambassadors for the change, making it easier to roll out and maintain momentum.

Communication is the glue that holds the change initiative together. It ensures transparency, keeps everyone informed about the project’s goals, progress, and milestones, and helps manage expectations. Clear and consistent communication can address fears and misconceptions, ensuring that everyone feels included.

Impact: A well-executed communication strategy can significantly reduce resistance, foster collaboration, and create a sense of ownership over the change.

Beyond the sponsor, leadership alignment is crucial. If senior leaders are not on the same page, conflicting messages can confuse employees and undermine the initiative. Unified leadership sends a clear message that the change is necessary, supported, and aligned with business goals.

Impact: When leaders are aligned, the likelihood of success increases because they will work together to solve problems and reduce barriers.?

Assessing whether the organization is ready for the change is an often-overlooked factor. Change readiness is about understanding the culture, maturity, and capacity of the organization to handle a change of the proposed magnitude.

Impact: By assessing readiness and addressing gaps, organizations can tailor their approach to minimize disruption and resistance.

While senior leadership is crucial, middle management often plays an equally, if not more important, role. They are the direct link between the executive level and the employees carrying out the change. If middle managers are not on board, they can easily undermine the initiative through passive resistance or failure to effectively communicate with their teams.

Impact: Middle managers can either accelerate change or slow it down. Engaging them as champions of change can significantly improve the likelihood of success.?

Employees need the skills and tools to adapt to new ways of working. Effective training ensures that they are not only capable of adopting the change but also confident in their ability to thrive in the new environment.

Impact: Training minimizes disruption and helps employees transition smoothly, reducing frustration and turnover.?

Continuous measurement of progress is essential for identifying gaps and making course corrections. Moreover, reinforcement activities (celebrations, rewards, recognition) help ensure the change sticks.

Impact: When success is measured and reinforced, employees are more likely to maintain new behaviors.

Every change project comes with inherent risks. Having a proactive approach to identifying and mitigating risks can prevent many common pitfalls. Risk management ensures that potential obstacles are addressed before they derail the initiative.

Impact: Proper risk management can prevent costly setbacks and help keep the initiative on track.

What was the question?

Returning to the central question: Is sponsorship the most critical element for success? I believe sponsorship is essential, but it can be overemphasized at the expense of other factors. Sponsorship acts as an enabler, but change happens at the level of individual employees, teams, and departments. A strong sponsor without sufficient communication, stakeholder engagement, or middle management buy-in might still struggle to drive lasting change.

In my Practical Framework Approach to Change (PFAC), sponsorship is wisely placed alongside communication and stakeholder engagement as the three "foundations" of Change Management. I’d argue that this tripartite foundation is well-balanced, as all three factors work together. Over-prioritizing sponsorship might neglect the human side of change, engagement, communication, and readiness, which are just as vital for the success of the initiative.

So basically, Sponsorship is indeed a critical factor in successful change, but it is not the sole driver. Effective change management requires an approach that includes strong communication, engaged stakeholders, aligned leadership, and readiness assessments, among others. Focusing too heavily on Sponsorship risks missing how change is truly adopted across an organization. For sustainable success, change initiatives need to be holistic, with every factor working in harmony. In my view, sponsorship is a key enabler, but it must be supported by robust communication and engagement to create a cohesive, resilient change effort.

New from the Highway of Change

Click here