Specifications - Getting the Basics Right

Specifications - Getting the Basics Right

When writing architectural specifications getting the basics in place from the start will help you build a document suitable to your needs. We have been consulting on specifications for many years and in this time we have witnessed the do’s and dont’s, learning from both our own and others’ experiences. We have listed below our thoughts on some basic rules that you can bookmark and come back to next time you need some guidance.

  1. Always edit your specification to reflect your appointment and the selected procurement route.
  2. Always start from a solid baseline document. Do not take the last project you prepared a specification for and change the headers and footers. No matter how vigilant you are, mistakes such as naming the wrong project, specifying incorrect materials and other basic errors will creep into your documents.
  3. Avoid using the term “or similar approved” in a specification. If you approve it you are assuming liability for it. Instead use the term ‘or acceptable equivalent’. By accepting an alternative the responsibility for Fitness for Purpose moves to the contractor and the architects acceptance is for design intent only. If the architect approves he takes back that responsibility. Normally alternatives are offered for program or cost reasons and the contractor is responsible for the fact that he is providing a different product that must be at least as good quality wise as the one specified by the architect. If the architect is specifying by description only the contractor is obliged to provide technical solution which again he has to be responsible for in terms of quality, performance, appearance and fitness for purpose.
  4. The proper use of defined terms is important in a specification. Check your contract!
  5. Document/section identification should appear on every page in the footer for document control purposes.
  6. Avoid putting specification clause numbers on your drawings. We recommend the use of product reference codes which are all included on a System Reference Sheet that links the drawings and the specification. This makes life much easier when changes are required.
  7. Avoid mixing architect designed and contractor designed specifications. By this we mean don’t name a very specific product and then provide performance characteristics for that product – this is not necessary and is potential for conflict resulting in claims.
  8. Avoid specifying temporary works – this is the contractor’s responsibility. Just specify the need to protect adequately, not how to do it.
  9. Remove names of individuals when specifying products and just provide the company’s details.
  10. Remove unfinished clauses and terms such as “if required”. If you are specifying a specific technical solution then you have to specify everything.
  11. Be careful when highlighting particular clauses by using bold or underlining, as this indicates that the clause is of special importance and there is no such thing in a specification, as by default it indicates that everything else is not so important.
  12. Always allow time to have your specifications proofread!
Elrond Burrell

Architect + Passive House & Low Carbon Expert | Born at 331.36 ppm CO2

8 年

Very helpful, thanks Mark Schumann. Now, if these posts were on your company blog, I would subscribe to get them in my inbox rather than finding them occasionally on LinkedIn. :-)

回复
Ian Abley

Technical Designer

8 年

You might add that because Caveat Emptor applies it is necessary to read Declarations of Performance required under the Construction Products Directive (as opposed to mere product marketing brochures) and obtain copies of the test certification or assessments those declarations are based on.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Schumann的更多文章

  • Practising Safe Specs

    Practising Safe Specs

    In a recent article, Matt Fox, Associate at RLB | Schumann wrote a good article on the 'Key Ingredients for a Good…

  • RLB | Schumann - Recruiting for a Specification Consultant

    RLB | Schumann - Recruiting for a Specification Consultant

    Since merging Schumann Consult with Rider Levett Bucknall to become RLB | Schumann, and post Brexit, we have continued…

  • The challenges of choice with interior finishes

    The challenges of choice with interior finishes

    A specification consultant’s life is not easy and has a reputation for being somewhat mundane or even boring, but that…

    2 条评论
  • Specifications - Poacher Turned Gamekeeper

    Specifications - Poacher Turned Gamekeeper

    Back in late 2014, a year after we had started out on the Schumann Consult journey we were invited by Darren Lester to…

  • RLB | Schumann - Why?

    RLB | Schumann - Why?

    A couple of weeks ago we announced that Schumann Consult was merging with Rider Levett Bucknall to create a new…

    1 条评论
  • Reflecting on Schumann Consult and beginning RLB | Schumann

    Reflecting on Schumann Consult and beginning RLB | Schumann

    Over the weekend, whilst standing around in the field trying to captain my beloved Ickleford Cricket Club, I took the…

    2 条评论
  • Redefining Outline Specifications

    Redefining Outline Specifications

    In an attempt to innovate and prepare for the future we have been spending a lot of time thinking about new ways of…

  • Some Specification Do's and Don'ts

    Some Specification Do's and Don'ts

    Last week we discussed ‘Getting The Basic’s Right‘ when it came to specifications. The reason for this was that time…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了