S&OP Is Dead. What’s Replacing It?
Alex Rotenberg
Leveraging exponential technology to digitalize the worlds supply chains, one customer and one industry at a time
For decades, Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) has been the backbone of supply chain management. It promised alignment across sales, operations, and finance, providing a structured framework for planning the future. But today, S&OP needs reinvention.
Why? The Divide Between Planning and Execution Has Disappeared
The emergence of agentic workflows, Sales and Operations Execution (S&OE), and mature control towers has made the traditional S&OP cycle feel slow, redundant, and out of touch.
This isn’t just an evolution—it’s a transformation. The processes and tools that once defined supply chain planning are being dismantled, replaced by systems that prioritize strategy and real-time execution.
Why S&OP Needs Reinvention
Traditional S&OP was built on static cycles:
But these cycles are too slow for today’s dynamic supply chains. Disruptions happen in real time. Markets shift overnight. Customers demand instant responsiveness. S&OP, with its reliance on periodic meetings and manual intervention, can’t keep up.
Here’s what’s driving the reinvention of S&OP:
1. S&OE Eliminates the Execution Gap
S&OP was designed to align decision-makers around critical planning decisions. But execution of these decisions was always the challenge. Today, S&OE bridges the gap between planning and execution:
By integrating execution into the planning process, S&OE makes the traditional S&OP cycle feel outdated.
2. Automation and AI-Driven Agentic Workflows Enable On-Demand S&OP
The promise of agentic workflows is transforming supply chain planning. These AI-powered systems autonomously handle disruptions, from rerouting shipments to adjusting production schedules. As a result:
领英推荐
3. The Shift Toward Strategy and Network Modeling
Planners are no longer just making tactical adjustments; they’re evolving into strategic architects. Their roles now focus on:
What Happens to Planners?
As S&OP evolves, planners aren’t being sidelined—they’re being elevated. But their role is changing dramatically:
This shift presents a significant opportunity for planners to take on more impactful roles within their organizations.
Is This the End of Traditional S&OP?
The traditional S&OP cycle no longer fits in a world of continuous disruption. The future of supply chain planning is emerging, and it looks like this:
Let’s Debate the Future of S&OP
This shift raises important questions:
Let’s discuss:
The reinvention of S&OP signals a new era for supply chain management—one defined by strategy, execution, and autonomous systems. Are we ready to embrace it?
Demand & Industrial Planning | SCM | IBP-S&OP | Project Management | MBA
1 周Great insights Alex! The shift from S&OP to XP&A is transforming supply chain planning, but many companies—especially in emerging markets like Brazil—are still maturing their S&OP processes. A study of Brazilian companies found that most lack advanced S&OP software, limiting data integration and scenario planning. While XP&A offers strategic benefits by integrating financial and operational planning, its adoption requires a solid S&OP foundation. Gartner predicts that by 2024, 70% of financial planning projects will adopt xP&A, but for companies still structuring S&OP, the priority should be improving collaboration, data accuracy, and technology adoption before advancing further. Undoubtedly the future is real-time execution and AI-driven planning, but many businesses aren’t ready yet—they must first master S&OP to ensure a sustainable evolution.?
MD & Founder @ Unique Excellence | Sustainable Operational & Supply Chain Innovation Specialist | Integrating sustainable & ethical practices (ESG) into clients operations
3 周Alex Rotenberg As mentioned, there is jjust a transition from “planning” to “execution”. So not dead, just depends on the maturity of the organisation. Less mature organisations probably should look at S&OP, more mature organisations should transition to S&OE… and then there is the next level, being IBP (Integrated Business Planning), where you can ultimately embedd AI/ ML to introduce AI-driven predictive analytics, scenario modeling, and real-time visibility across global supply chains. The focus of S&OP, S&OE and IBP is in the end just to ensure a resilient, responsive, and financially optimised supply chain. As long as you adopt any one of these!
Senior Supply Chain Management Executive/ Consultant | Transforming Operations to Enable Growth and Expansion
3 周S and OP was never meant to deal with “real time disruptions.” That is for S and OE. If you are dealing with the fire of the day in your S&OP process, you’re missing the point. You need both S&OP and S&OE.
Account Executive
3 周Alex you and some others are seeing the horizon before the rest of the group catches up. I agree with you and some of the comments in this thread "SO&E with AI" is an innovation that will lead to better results.
Should have Played Quidditch for England
3 周Fascinating Alex Rotenberg thanks for a blog on S&OP, who knew?