As soon as the market swings back up, you’re going to have a tough time trying to attract talent, if you don’t allow flexibility in your workforce.
Keri Smith
Future of Talent and HR Recruitment Consultant featured on NBC, CBS, Business Insider, Chicago Weekly | 1:1 Coaching: Exec, Mid-Career, Gen-Z | Writer & Adventurer
Today's post on everyone’s favorite Linkedin debate: return to office mandates are bad.
And I don't mean bad in a subjective way. I mean bad in an objective, evidence-based way. Why? Let me show you.
First of all, return to office mandates are bad because they disrupt our work-life balance. We've spent the last year or so working from home, enjoying the benefits and convenience of our own space. We've learned how to manage our time, communicate effectively, and be productive without commuting, dressing up, or dealing with office politics. We've also had more time to spend with our families, pets, hobbies, and Netflix. Now, some bosses want to take all that away and force us to go back to the office, where we have to deal with traffic, noise, distractions, and awkward small talk.
No, thank you. I'll take my coffee in pajamas, as I review my morning inbox.
According to a survey by McKinsey , 87 percent of people who have the chance to work flexibly take it. That shows how much people value their work-life balance.
Secondly, return to office mandates are bad because they are unnecessary and ineffective. Studies have shown that remote workers are happier, healthier, and more productive than office workers. They also save money and reduce their environmental impact by not driving or taking public transportation. Remote work is the future of work, and it benefits both employees and employers. Why fix something that isn't broken?
According to a report by Global Workplace Analytics , remote workers save an average of $4,000 per year on transportation costs. They also reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 3.6 million tons per year.
On the other hand, a Stanford survey found that companies that allow remote work see an average increase of $2,000 in profit per remote worker. They also have 25 percent lower employee turnover.
25 PERCENT LOWER TURNOVER!!!
领英推荐
Thirdly, return to office mandates are bad because they are insensitive and discriminatory. Not everyone can or wants to go back to the office. Some people have health issues that make them vulnerable to COVID-19 or other infections. Some people have family responsibilities that require them to stay at home. Some people have personal preferences that make them more comfortable working from home. Forcing them to go back to the office is a violation of their rights and dignity.
Increased costs: Women face increased costs as more companies return to office this fall. This includes childcare costs, transportation costs, and other expenses.
Increased stress: Returning to the office for women and people in underrepresented communities also means returning “to face bias, microaggressions, those insults, those everyday insults that happen that impact us psychologically and cause stress,” according to Dr. Janet Taylor.
Pushing women out of work: The lack of child care and in-person schooling that has pushed millions of women out of the workforce in the U.S. since March 2020 has only gotten worse with the return to office.
Challenging for women: As many companies firm up their return to office or hybrid working policies, data suggests that they might be giving the same values of flexibility and remote work a side-eye, which can be particularly challenging for women in the workforce.
Some women of color aren’t ready for a return to office due to microaggressions and pressure to conform to white standards. And that’s only part of the story for Diversity and RTO. Minorities are less inclined to return to the office full time because of caretaker responsibilities, concerns about safety and security, and feelings of inclusion. According to a recent survey, women and people of color are less likely to want to return to the office full time because of these reasons.
One study found that only 3% of Black knowledge workers wanted to return to full-time on-site work, as opposed to 21% of white peers. Another found that Black, Asian-American, and Latinx knowledge workers all preferred hybrid or fully remote work at higher rates than whites do.
According to a survey by LinkedIn , 56 percent of remote workers say they would quit their job if they were forced to return to the office. They also report higher levels of satisfaction, engagement, and well-being than office workers.
So, when the market fires up again, (and there are certain indicators it might happen soon!) are you ready to be a competitive employer?
Results-Oriented Instructional Designer | Collaborative Leader | Educational Technology Expert
1 年I decided to get my MBA in Global Leadership to learn how to be more agile in location and cultural settings and potentially be a team member in diverse cultural teams. It was fortunate that I also learned how remote work can strengthen a global team while still saving time and money to a company through not having to send a team leader to distant locations unless absolutely necessary, so less air travel and hotel expenses. And there is also increased efficiency when a team member is not jetlagged for meetings and productivity sessions. I can also see how there is a huge difference in reduced turnover through remote vs. on-site production. This was a great article to read and produce the conversations it has. Thanks Keri.
Digital Transformation Leader * Startup Founder * Product Leader * Business Development Professional
1 年I agree with most of this piece. There are a couple of things I'd like to point out. I'd like to see the sampling segmentation done to produce those numbers. I'm almost positive that older workers wont quit or turn down jobs due to having to work on site. Employers (recruiters) should take that into account when they mark a person as not a "cultural fit". There are 40 million professionals over the age of 45 out of work in the US. It's taking them an average of 12 months to find work. There's a ready willing and able workforce available, companies just have to put a cap on the rampant agism that is going on. None of this means I disagree with the move to WFH. The benefits far outweigh middle management's need to be relevant. Better work life balance, better health for people and the environment, better dispersal of spending power, less consumption of resources, and generally you get more work hours out of dedicated employees (older employees tend to put in more time when they work from home). Now for companies the negative benefits need to be understood. One is the political power large companies wield by having large campuses and concentrating the spending power of their employee base.
Product Pitching & GTM advisor, Career Counselor, Placement Coach
1 年Best topic for current era