Solving the Scooter Parking Problem in Tallinn: Insights and Strategies for a Safer Urban Environment

The proliferation of shared scooters as a popular and eco-friendly urban transportation option has brought numerous benefits, such as cost-effectiveness, reduced traffic congestion, and lower carbon emissions. However, a significant challenge has emerged: indiscriminate parking.

This research, led by Julia Bulakh , Joseph Kalu , and O?uz Ali Hanecio?lu under the guidance of Abiodun Ogunyemi, Ph.D. , seeks to understand the reasons behind this issue and provide insights. The objective is to offer recommendations to policymakers, urban planners, scooter-sharing businesses, and the public. Focusing on Tallinn, the ScooterScatter User Research aims to address this pressing issue.

Background to the Study

Indiscriminate parking of shared scooters refers to the disorderly manner in which users leave scooters at various locations within a city, often ignoring designated parking areas and without consideration for pedestrians, traffic, or public spaces. This behavior has led to stress for pedestrians and poses a serious safety concern. For instance, in 2020, nearly 90% of Paris residents voted in favor of banning shared scooters due to these issues. If not properly managed, similar actions could be taken in cities worldwide.

Tallinn, a vibrant and growing city, has not been immune to this phenomenon. As the city embraces eco-friendly and affordable transportation options, understanding the reasons behind the indiscriminate parking of shared scooters is essential.

Research Problem Statement

This research focuses on the indiscriminate parking of shared scooters in Tallinn. The goal is to raise awareness and promote a harmonious coexistence between this mode of transportation and the city's residents and visitors.

Research Objectives

The team aims to:

• Investigate the factors contributing to indiscriminate parking.
• Identify the root causes of this behaviour.
• Assess the impact of indiscriminate parking on urban life.
• Propose effective strategies for Tallinn.

Research Questions

1. What are the underlying factors driving users to park shared scooters indiscriminately in Tallinn?
2. How does the availability and design of scooter-sharing infrastructure influence parking behaviour?
3. What are the safety implications of indiscriminate scooter parking on Tallinn's sidewalks and roadways?

Methodology

The research methodology included a literature review to inform the development of user interview questions and surveys to examine user behaviour, urban infrastructure, and scooter-sharing service characteristics. Google Forms was used to collect quantitative data from 111 participants, specifically targeting shared scooter users in Tallinn. Participants were recruited through social media platforms like Facebook, Telegram, and WhatsApp.

Data Analysis

A quantitative research method was employed, with data collected from surveys. Open-ended questions provided qualitative insights. The data analysis process included:

1. Defining research questions.
2. Collecting and storing data.
3. Cleaning data.
4. Analyzing data using Critical Theory.
5. Sharing insights.

Types of Collected Data

We collected the following data: Demographics, scooter usage patterns, and parking behaviour.

Main Findings

Background

Participants were primarily over 25 years old, of diverse genders and occupations, with 68.5% being full-time employees. The top reasons for using shared scooters were speed (48.6%) and convenience for last-mile transportation (20.7%).

Parking Behavior

• 70.3% reported parking scooters properly on sidewalks or in designated areas.
• 48.6% followed app guidelines for parking.
• The absence of designated areas was the most common reason for indiscriminate parking, along with time constraints.

Awareness of Parking Guidelines

• 79.3% were aware of scooter parking guidelines in Tallinn.
• 64.9% received notifications about responsible parking from scooter-sharing companies.

Safety and Accessibility

• 77.4% considered indiscriminate parking a significant safety threat.
• 59.5% had personally experienced safety issues related to scooter parking.

Regulations and Enforcement

• 62.2% were unaware of current regulations related to scooter usage in Tallinn.
• 21% considered the regulations somewhat effective.

Incentives and Penalties

• 63.1% reported that current regulations do not influence their parking behavior.
• 48.6% believed that incentives could motivate better parking habits.
• Only 18% felt that penalties would influence their behaviour.

Discussion

The findings reveal that while many users are aware of the guidelines, there is still a significant portion who park indiscriminately due to the lack of designated areas, time constraints, and insufficient regulations. The data also show that poorly parked scooters pose a safety risk to pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users.

Reflections on Data Analysis

Critical Theory was applied to analyze the cultural factors influencing scooter parking behaviour. This approach helped uncover the social dynamics and assumptions that contribute to the issue.

Methodology

The survey gathered both quantitative and qualitative data on various cultural aspects of scooter parking. Thematic analysis was used to group the data and identify key insights.

Challenges and Surprising Insights

• Challenges: Difficulty in scheduling user interviews due to time constraints.
• Surprising Insights: Many users are unaware of the potential issues caused by improper parking. Additionally, while there is support for incentives, few people favour fines for improper parking.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this research, the following strategies are recommended to address the issue of indiscriminate scooter parking in Tallinn:

1. Establish More Designated Parking Areas: Increase the number of clearly marked and strategically located scooter parking zones throughout the city. These areas should be easily accessible and convenient for users, especially near popular destinations and transit hubs.
2. Enhance Public Awareness Campaigns: Launch educational campaigns to inform the public about the importance of responsible scooter parking. These campaigns should emphasize the safety implications of improper parking and encourage users to follow guidelines.
3. Implement Incentive Programs: Introduce incentive programs, such as discounts or rewards, for users who consistently park scooters in designated areas. These incentives can be provided through scooter-sharing apps and should be promoted widely.
4. Strengthen Enforcement of Regulations: Introduce or enhance enforcement measures, including fines or penalties, for users who park scooters improperly. This should be coupled with a clear communication strategy to ensure users are aware of these regulations.
5. Improve App Features for Better Parking Guidance: Collaborate with scooter-sharing companies to improve app features that guide users to the nearest designated parking areas. This could include real-time notifications or parking reminders when a ride is completed.
6. Engage with the Community: Establish forums or feedback mechanisms where residents can voice their concerns about scooter parking. This engagement will help tailor solutions to specific neighbourhood needs and build community support for shared scooter programs.
7. Collaborate with Urban Planners: Work closely with urban planners to integrate scooter parking considerations into the broader transportation and infrastructure planning of the city. This includes ensuring that new developments and public spaces include adequate scooter parking facilities.
8. Pilot Programs and Continuous Monitoring: Implement pilot programs to test the effectiveness of different strategies, such as designated parking zones or incentive schemes, and continuously monitor their impact. Adjust policies based on data and feedback from users and the public.

Conclusion

The ScooterScatter User Research offers valuable insights into the problem of indiscriminate scooter parking in Tallinn. The study recommends clearer regulations, enhanced awareness campaigns, and incentives to encourage proper parking. These findings aim to foster a more harmonious relationship between shared scooters and the urban environment.

References

1. Rebecca Bellan, Harri Weber, micro-mobility in limbo: takeaways from Paris and LA, TechCrunch, 2022

2. Zoi Christoforou, Anne de Bortoli, Christos Gioldasis, Regine Seidowsky, Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 92, 2021

3. Muhammet Deveci, Ilgin Gokasar, Dragan Pamucar, Yan Chen, D'Maris Coffman, Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based RAFSI model, Sustainable Cities and Society, Volume 91, 2023

4. Stefan G?ssling, Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 79, 2020

5. Joseph Hollingsworth, Brenna Copeland and Jeremiah X Johnson, Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters, 2019

6. Aryan Hosseinzadeh, Abolfazl Karimpour, Robert Kluger, Factors influencing shared micromobility services: An analysis of e-scooters and bikeshare, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 100, 2021.

7. Nicholas J. Klein Making Sense of the Parisian Scooter Ban, Mui Ho Center for Cities, 2023

8. Noland, Robert B. Trip patterns and revenue of shared e-scooters in Louisville, Kentucky. Findings (2019).

9. Yaniv Rivlin, How active and shared mobility is a win-win for cities by unlocking climate and economic benefits, Intelligent transport, 2022