Software License Management
Organizations use software. The software should be licensed. With the increase in number of people working in an organization, there is increase in complexity in managing the licenses and ensuring that unauthorized copy of any software is not installed. So there could be a situation that organizations have software for which they do not have a license or for which the number of licenses is less than the instances used. This makes Software License Management a very important and critical activity of Software Asset Management.
Organizations are legally liable to the publishers if:
- They have any unlicensed version of software deployed, or
- They do not comply with any of the terms of license agreement
Software Compliance is a key activity of Software License Management. It has to ensure that an organization complies with the publishers licensing requirements.
The activity that organization performs to ensure that they are in compliance is termed as software license audit. IT departments struggle to keep track of licensing usage. This needs the specialized Software Asset Management Team to help track and manage licenses. There are tools to help asset management team identify the software that are deployed in the environment. Manual audits are also performed for a certain sample to authenticate the discovery data.
Non-compliance to the licensing terms could be unintentional or intentional. In case it is unintentional then internal software license audit gives opportunity to the organization to ensure compliance. Organizational growth and restructuring besides Mergers and acquisitions contributes to the chaos in terms of unknown license usage/consumption even if an organization has a good software asset policy.
On the other hand there are intentional non-compliance cases where organization tries to save on the license costs.
Software publishers have to manage and enforce their intellectual property rights besides ensuring that their customers are paying for what they use. A Publisher can ask for an audit at any time. Such audits are termed as Publisher Audits. It is during this course that an organization could readily agree for an audit or might decline the request. There is a typical negotiation that happens at this stage. Publisher provides their data of what they presume is the licenses consumed by the organization. Organization may negotiate and agree at a figure and buy the licenses. On the other hand there might be a dispute. In such a situation Publisher can take a legal action. The worst for the organization can be that it may face a closure of business due to non-compliance.
www.process-consultant.blogspot.com
Author | CxO Advisor | Servant Leader | Value Co-Creator | ITIL Ambassador | Strategic Innovation & Transformation Partner
9 年Thanks!!! Points taken Richard. I consider Licence optimization as another activity of Software Asset Management. And that is a reason that I have excluded optimization along with some other critical activities as part of this post.
Multi-discipline, technically astute senior manager with extensive Business Interface, Project Management, Technical and Service Delivery Capabilities. Excellent communicator, proactive and results driven.
9 年There is one major element that you've missed here; optimisation. Most companies we have helped have assets that can be removed to save annual support and maintenance costs. Legality is covered by a focusing on optimisation but prioritising this puts money back in the Companies pocket rather than the publisher, and also ensures processes exist to better govern your Software estate and correct wayward procurement and CM processes so that compliance is not such a high risk. This is what we do for our clients.
Consultant - Engagement Manager
9 年Nice..