Software Industry Post-ZIRP
Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP)

Software Industry Post-ZIRP

As you all know I've been talking to a lot of people these days. I'm also reading a lot and I'm thinking even more. It's a great gig if you can get it, I'm learning so much. I'm keenly aware of the privilege and I wish similar experiences for you.

As I think about the business of software, I'm reflecting on the macro. I figured it might be helpful for me to break this down a bit for those who are either less experienced [this means old] or less of a macro reflective [this means nerdy].

You are not imaging that the last 24 months have been a real grind for our industry. This started to get obvious in the months running up to March 2022 and things have not settled down since. Many tech businesses are struggling. It's emotionally taxing and unsettling, especially for the leaders and executive teams who are being forced to pivot.

We don't talk about enough is just how long it takes for software companies to reach sustained profitability, or even what is the right amount of profitability (pretty sure the answer for an activist investor is VERY different from a tech innovator on this question). This lack of business understanding (vs. revenue understanding) goes broad and deep. Most executive teams have been trained to talk exclusively about bookings and revenue growth. Most engineering and product leaders have learned to talk exclusively about investment and headcount (cost not revenue).

Until very recently, very few conversations gave sufficient debate between growth and profit and even fewer leadership teams have been able to do the HARD collaborative work on getting aligned on the real trade offs to drive the business forward. If the only shared leadership metric in focus is top line growth you are naturally going to believe that the rest of the business indicators are less important.

The tech reality distortion field has allowed most to believe that anything outside of the top line was pedestrian. Details each department would manage on their own. Portfolio and strategy execution are relegated to the budget process monitored by finance.

The problem with making this only a budget discussion is that budgets are often based on organizational muscle memory. They get built by smart spreadsheet people with a delta mindset, +/- over prior year. This approach is grounded in a core belief that we know what we are doing and that past performance is the best predictor of future success. This is great if nothing is changing but then interest rates started going up and there was a collective whoops moment.


The belief that the best way to navigate the future of tech is by adjusting what we did in the past is probably flawed. I mean seriously flawed.

A feel a need to quote Safra Catz

If it doesn't make sense... it doesn't make sense!

The software business playbook for the last few decades has been about growth at all costs. The go big or go home thinking was not just arrogance, it was actuallyrational behavior based on [recent] experience. Moving fast and breaking things was THE proven path to unicorn status.

https://xkcd.com/1428/

The real issue is that without exits, the software ecosystem atrophies and this is very dangerous for both innovation and opportunity. What is unique about this post-ZIRP moment is that we have both a boom and bust cycle happening at the same time. If you are part of the new new thing [all things AI] the future looks bright. If you are a mature and successful software solution things are HARD.

In software there are three primary exit strategies - IPO, Private Equity or strategic purchase. Lucky for everyone, all three seem to be improving in 2024 but the exit opportunities are much harder to capture.

To successfully navigate this new normal you need to embrace the reality that the rules are changing mid-game. This means you have to adapt your strategy, it does not mean you need to lose hope. The scrappy can-do attitude of tech is exactly the right mindset, but we all need to collectively embrace unlearning. Keeping your head up to context shifts and asking yourself what are we doing wrong (for this context) early and often.

Most importantly, you are probably going to need to build some new support systems and habits. In fact, that is where I'd recommend you start. Instead of jumping straight into problem solving, ask yourself who you need to connect with to fill your bucket and remind yourself of your why.

Then dig in on who you need to help you think differently, because I am confident that those who challenge our assumptions and help us rethink what we know are exactly the guides we need.

Together we are going to successfully navigate this exciting and crazy future - but we will only succeed when we let go of the belief that we know what happens next.




Sanil Pillai

Bridging Human Potential and AI Innovation | Coaching for the Future of Work

11 个月

Very well articulated Meg! Although focused on AI, this op-ed from Tim O'Reilly highlights the engine that powers this behavior - https://www.theinformation.com/articles/ai-has-an-uber-problem

Marc Havercroft

Head of Asia ISV Microsoft | Ex-President & Chief commercial officer go1 / Ex-Chief customer officer SAP SuccessFactors

11 个月

Great read Meg !

Amy Wilson

Advisor | Board Member | Investor | Former Product Exec at SAP, Workday

11 个月

Super interesting Meg - thank you for sharing. I appreciate your sponginess! I started the book Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism and the World and, according to the book, the origin of move fast and break things/fail fast/etc. was at Leland Stanford's horse farm where he "invented" a method which trained horses to be faster, sooner (which often led to more horses getting hurt). (Note that the book does not give a very favorable view of L. Stanford nor the various atrocities that took place during this time.) So, the previous "thinking differently" actually originated in the late 1800's and it is certainly time to do some unlearning! https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/malcolm-harris/palo-alto/9780316592031/?lens=little-brown

“… I am confident that those who challenge our assumptions and help us rethink what we know are exactly the guides we need.” Yes!!! And we in the applied Social Science fields (anthropology/sociology/organizational psychology) are out there looking to collaborate with leaders open to seeing differently and willing to take the time to practice. Happy to direct readers to a stellar list of practitioners who can help with both the mindset and the methods. When corporations can no longer rely on favourable rates for hyper growth rethinking strategy falls squarely into the long range value creation zone. Time to get to work on some fundamentals of the relationship between human experience and profitability. The former should be having a major moment. https://www.dhirubhai.net/company/epic-people/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Meg Bear的更多文章

  • The future is Interdisciplinary

    The future is Interdisciplinary

    Some of the innovations I'm most impressed with have not really been innovations at all - they have been…

    14 条评论
  • Q2 and Q3 2024 Sabbatical Bookclub

    Q2 and Q3 2024 Sabbatical Bookclub

    My reading in Q2/Q3 came in waves with a few bigger breaks than usual, likely a result of too many ideas flowing from…

    8 条评论
  • Why you must start now

    Why you must start now

    It's hard to know how to innovate these days. Everything is a bit upside down.

    7 条评论
  • Closing the opportunity gap

    Closing the opportunity gap

    I graduated high school at 16, something that seemed completely normal to me at the time, and now as I launch my own…

    17 条评论
  • Admire out loud

    Admire out loud

    There are so many amazing people - and so many things to admire. Every day I notice them.

    14 条评论
  • Digital Everything

    Digital Everything

    Attending TED after just finishing Kara's Burn Book had me reflecting on her comment that everything will be digital. I…

    6 条评论
  • Sabbatical bookclub Q1 2024

    Sabbatical bookclub Q1 2024

    As part of my #Sabbatical #Growth goals I am sharing some of the learning-focused reading I've done. My Q4 2023 list is…

    5 条评论
  • Being Wrong

    Being Wrong

    It's great to know stuff - knowledge is power and the benefits of crystallized intelligence are many, but the reality…

    16 条评论
  • Perspective taking is hard

    Perspective taking is hard

    When I was in high school I spent summers with my dad in the bay area and school year in Arizona. Many of those summers…

    3 条评论
  • Experiential Unlearning

    Experiential Unlearning

    As I wrap up my first #SabbaticalGoals quarter (Q4) and lean into planning for the second (Q1) I am looking forward to…

    22 条评论

社区洞察