The Software House Tax

The Software House Tax

We've recently been speaking with brokers, MGAs and technology providers about the challenges and opportunities they’re seeing in broker-distributed products.

A little background, at Swallow we're working with brokers doing real-time pricing on top of software houses, and on the other side of the table, MGAs who are working on direct distribution via brokers.

I’d like to caveat this post - I come from a technology and not insurance background, so my take is a mixture of what I've read, heard and understood. It gives me a certain lens on the topics discussed. I’m always open to feedback so please do reach out to discuss!


The broker market in the UK

The UK insurance broker market is projected to grow to over £19 billion in 2024, nearly a 10% increase from the previous year. A big driver of this growth has been a rising demand for healthcare, accidental insurance, and SMEs products.

A significant trend within the industry is the consolidation of smaller brokers by larger firms. With rising operational costs, regulatory pressures, and increased competition in the space, brokers are looking to consolidate to achieve cost savings, enhance service offerings, and use their scale to leverage new technologies for greater efficiency and profitability.


Broker distribution

Insurance brokers either contact underwriters directly to get quotes on behalf of their clients, or use software houses to get automatically get quotes from MGAs and carriers. On the latter, brokers "rekey" their client's information, and the software sends it to various carriers, who then return quotes. This allows brokers to compare and choose the best options quickly. The software houses play a powerful role in this process, as they streamline the entire quoting and policy management system for brokers and MGAs.


The “software house tax”

Whilst the software houses were the first step towards digitisation of the broker-insurer relationship, they have know grown into industry behemoths, representing huge spend on both the broker, MGA and carrier P&Ls.

Over years of dominant market positions, these software houses are increasingly becoming a barrier to innovation, with high implementation costs preventing new entrants and even new products with costly change management and data integration fees.

With these businesses are now reaching £100s million in revenues whilst reducing the consumer choice by restricting who can innovate in the market, there must be an alternative?

One could argue that the role of the software house is an outdated paradigm that needs to change, with the power put in back in the hands of the MGAs and carriers, those taking on risk, and brokers, those working hard for the customer’s best interest.


Where are the opportunities for innovation?

  • Disintermediation: MGAs distributing through brokers often are using software houses to distribute and manage their products, but some are looking to build relationships more directly with brokers, saving both parties on the high costs of the software houses.
  • Speed to market: By automating part of the underwriting process, MGAs can get prices to brokers faster, putting them at the top of the pile and improving broker experience of working with them, a surefire way to get more business coming the MGA’s way.
  • Launch fast: Capacity is hard to come by, so working closely with MGAs as a new broker gives the opportunity to enter a market with a targeted proposition, learn quickly and amass data on new products.
  • Realtime Pricing: Once live, brokers can start with one insurer providing net rates and begin to add more underwriting partners, and begin to test pricing to better understand the needs of their customer base.


A brighter future

We believe there is an opportunity here for MGAs and brokers to build stronger direct relationships, utilising the latest technologies in the market to ultimately improve profitability and give customers better prices and greater choice.

Fortunately, there are several companies innovating in this space, building new broker management tools and policy administration systems designed for the broker distribution channel.


At Swallow, we're working with brokers, MGAs and these new technologies to build the modern pricing platform, making it quick and easy for anyone to manage, build, test and deploy rules and rates to market.

If you're interested to hear more about our platform, please reach out to me or book a demo on our website - swallow.app

Scott Holmes

Director, Northern Europe & Africa at Quantee

4 个月

There is value in the software house system I think Sam as there are hundreds / thousands of brokers in the UK that insurers and MGAs want to distribute to, so the SWHs provide a consistency at least rather than having to distribute to them all individually. I think it's fair that they charge a fee for this value as a result. That said, having been on both sides of this distribution process myself, it is frustratingly slow and error prone. API and other new pricing technologies are essential for insurers/mgas/brokers to stay competitive in this space

Risto Rossar

CEO of Insly, a no-code platform for MGAs and Insurers to sell insurance, build products and control finances.

4 个月

Having conducted business in numerous countries, I’ve observed that the UK "Software House tax" issue originates from a time when APIs were not prevalent. Insurers and MGAs were not ready to provide pricing via APIs, leading to the integration of price algorithms within these software houses, which effectively created a monopoly. The solution to breaking this monopoly is for all insurers and MGAs to offer pricing and policy-issuing APIs to the market. This would allow entrepreneurs to build competing systems to oligopoly software houses, thereby driving down the "software house tax" to a more competitive, market-driven level and introducing more modern solutions to the market.

Louw Hopley

Co-founder at Root | APIs for embedded insurance

4 个月

Sam Clifton, looking at the UK market in comparison to other markets (e.g. US, Europe and South Africa), I have a big personal gripe with some aggregation points in the UK market that's driving high costs, commoditisation of products/pricing, and homogenous customer options. On the broker-side of the insurance market, technology is all captured by a single player, which not only makes it super expensive for people to enter the market or experiment/change things, it also literally forces all the products to look and feel the same. The cost of trying to be too restrictive with "standardisation". PCW's does the same. Basically, your options as an insurance company or MGA are: a) do the same standard products as everyone else, pay a boatload in tech fees, but then have access to vast distribution networks. b) be innovative and do a unique product, but then get cut off from the big broker networks' distribution. Tech should be an enabler, enabling innovation and evolution of insurance to catch up with modern times & the digital era. Not be crazy expensive whilst driving outdated standards on old cumbersome tech. PS: I have lots of respect for that one tech player → they achieved something great.

Peter Tilbrook

Insurtech Entrepreneur/ Amateur Endurance Athlete/ ACII

4 个月

Well said Sam Clifton, there just hasn’t been enough focus on systems for MGAs or Insurers that consider real world distribution, a focus on the internal has led to this dominant position for a few powerful consumer facing sites. The result, less customer choice and higher costs for everyone involved. Loro just like Swallow believes in true intermediation and complex layered distribution. Take control of your business and embrace the new age of insurtechs. Douglas Ver Mulm Chris Kay

Sam Clifton

Founding team at Swallow | Develop, test and deploy a ratings engine in minutes.

4 个月

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了