Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Series Design and Development (A3,4) CSSLP

Best Practices for Design and Development (A3 and A4)

I lead a team of project managers with a focus on guiding companies through the intricate processes of security and compliance. Achieving compliance with a chosen cybersecurity framework is not just about understanding regulations; it's fundamentally about project management. The Design and Development phase (A3 and A4) of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) is critical for embedding security into the software from the start. Let’s delve into the key success factors, deliverables, and metrics for this phase.

Understanding the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)

The Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) is a systematic process for developing software that ensures high quality and efficiency. It includes several phases: planning, requirements analysis, design, development, testing, deployment, and maintenance. Each phase has specific deliverables and objectives, aiming to produce a reliable, functional, and secure software product. By following the SDLC, organizations can manage and control software development, ensuring that projects meet customer requirements and are delivered on time and within budget.

Key Success Factors

Comprehensive Security Test Plan

• Mapping types of security testing required at different stages of SDLC will ensure that security testing is planned and executed at all stages to identify vulnerabilities early and continuously.
• Deliverable: Detailed test plans outlining how identified risks will be managed.

Effective Threat Modeling

• Identifying threats to the software via thorough threat identification helps in preemptively addressing potential security issues.
• Deliverables: Updated Threat Modeling Artifacts consisting of updated DFDs (Data Flow Diagrams), elements, threat lists, and recommendations.

Design Security Analysis

• Analysis of threats to various software components through a detailed examination of potential threats to different parts of the software will help to mitigate risks effectively.
• Deliverable: Design Security Review that contains formal specification that lists changes to software components and design based on a review from security architects and the assessments team. Documentation of necessary design changes to address identified security issues.

Privacy Implementation Assessment

• Efforts required for the implementation of privacy-related controls based on assessments ensuring privacy controls are identified and implemented as per privacy assessments to protect sensitive data.
• Deliverable: Privacy Implementation Assessment Results which contain documented recommendations for implementing privacy controls based on assessment results.

Policy Compliance Review (Updates)

• Updates for policy compliance as related to Phase 3 is important for regular reviews and to ensure all designs and developments comply with relevant policies and regulations.
• Deliverable: Updated Policy Compliance Analysis.

Metrics

Threats, Probability, and Severity

• Comprehensive documentation of identified threats, their likelihood, and potential impact.

Percent Compliance with Company Policies

• Measure of compliance levels before and after the phase to ensure continuous adherence.

Percent of compliance in Phase 2 versus Phase 3.

Entry Points for Software (Using DFDs)

• Identification of all data entry points to ensure thorough threat modeling and security measures.

Percent of Risk Accepted versus Mitigated

• Analysis of how identified risks are handled, with a focus on mitigation over acceptance.

Percent of Initial Software Requirements Redefined

• Measure of how initial requirements were adjusted based on security assessments.

Percent of Software Architecture Changes

• Documentation of architectural changes to enhance security based on analysis and testing.

Percent of SDLC Phases Without Corresponding Software Security Testing

• Ensuring that all phases include adequate security testing to catch issues early.

Percent of Software Components with Implementations Related to Privacy Controls

• Measure of privacy control implementations across software components to ensure data protection.

Number of Lines of Code

• Total lines of code reviewed and analyzed for potential security issues.

Number of Security Defects Found Using Static Analysis Tools

• Identification of security defects through static code analysis.

Number of High-Risk Defects Found Using Static Analysis Tools

• Focus on high-risk defects identified through analysis to prioritize remediation efforts.

Defect Density (Security Issues per 1000 Lines of Code)

• Measure of security issues relative to the amount of code to track quality and security over time.

The Design and Development phase (A3) of the SDLC is essential for integrating security into the software from the outset. By focusing on comprehensive security test plans, effective threat modeling, thorough design security analysis, privacy implementation assessments, and regular policy compliance reviews, organizations can ensure their software is secure and compliant throughout its development. This leads into phase 4 of the SDL which is also called Design and Development.

Design and Development (A4): SDL Activities and Best Practices

Key Success Factors

Security Test Case Execution

• Ensuring coverage of all relevant test cases including comprehensive testing to ensure all identified risks and vulnerabilities are addressed.
• Deliverable: Security Test Execution Report. Review progress against identified security test cases. Documenting the results and progress of security test cases to ensure all areas are

Security Testing

• Completing all types of security testing and prioritizing remediation of problems found.
• Deliverable: Security Testing Reporting containing the findings from different types of security testing. Remediation Report providing status on the security posture of the product and remediation efforts.

Privacy Validation and Remediation

• Effectiveness of privacy-related controls and remediation of any issues found.
• Deliverable: Privacy Compliance Report that validates that recommendations from privacy assessments have been implemented.

Policy Compliance Review

• Updates for policy compliance as related to Phase 4.
• Deliverable: Updated Policy Compliance Analysis.

Metrics

Percent Compliance with Company Policies (Updated)

• Percent of compliance in Phase 3 versus Phase 4 to track compliance improvements between phases to ensure continuous adherence.

Number of Lines of Code Tested Effectively with Static Analysis Tools

• Ensuring thorough code analysis to identify potential security issues.

Number of Security Defects Found Through Static Analysis Tools

• Identifying and documenting security defects found during static analysis.

Number of High-Risk Defects Found Through Static Analysis Tools

• Prioritizing and addressing high-risk defects identified through static analysis.

Defect Density (Security Issues per 1000 Lines of Code)

• Measuring the density of security issues to track code quality and security over time.

Number and Types of Security Issues Found Through Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Manual Code Review, Penetration Testing, and Fuzzing

• Comprehensive documentation of security issues identified through various testing methods.
• Overlap of security issues found through different types of testing.
• Comparison of severity of findings from different types of testing.
• Mapping of findings to threats/risks identified earlier.

Number of Security Findings Remediated

• Tracking the number and severity of remediated findings to ensure continuous improvement.
• Severity of findings.

Time spent (approximate) in hours to remediate findings.

Number, Types, and Severity of Findings Outstanding

• Documenting outstanding issues to prioritize remediation efforts.

Percentage Compliance with the Security Test Plan

• Ensuring adherence to the planned security tests and identifying any gaps.

Number of Security Test Cases Executed

• Tracking the execution of security test cases to ensure comprehensive testing.

Number of findings from security test case execution.

Stay informed, stay compliant, and let’s work together to ensure our organizations meet and exceed compliance standards.

#ProjectManagement #SDLC #Compliance #DesignAndDevelopmentPhase #Cybersecurity #RiskManagement #ContinuousImprovement #CSSLP