SOCtober @ Senthorus: Why Most SOCs Are Playing Defense, and How the Best Are Changing the Game
As the inaugural topic in our 10-part series this SOCtober, we're diving into the vast divide between traditional SOCs and next-generation SOCs. It's a showdown: Reactive Mode vs. Proactive Mode of working. Let's break it down.
From Reactive to Proactive
In the constantly shifting world of cyber threats, how a Security Operations Center (SOC) responds can make all the difference between an organization that thrives and one that merely survives. Let's delve into the fundamental distinctions between the traditional, reactive SOCs and the forward-thinking, proactive ones.
The Traditional Reactive SOC
Picture a security guard who only responds once the bank alarm sounds. That's your traditional SOC. It springs into action after security events, following predefined rules to ward off known threats. But what about the sly new threats or those that don't fit the old patterns? They often slip through. This SOC places its emphasis on the technical defense lines: firewalls, antivirus software, and the like. In doing so, it tends to overlook the broader business context, sometimes making its responses a touch out of sync with business needs. As cyber threats multiply and diversify, such SOCs grapple with alert fatigue, a flood of false positives, and potentially, slower reactions.
The Proactive Next-Gen SOC
Now, envision a security guard who spots potential thieves from a distance, assesses their intentions, and deters them even before they approach the bank. This proactive SOC isn't just sitting and waiting. It actively scours the network, employs state-of-the-art tools like AI and machine learning, and dives deep into threat intelligence and behavioral analysis. This SOC isn't just tech-savvy, it's business-smart too, aligning security objectives seamlessly with the company's larger goals. The result? A SOC that can pinpoint and ward off novel threats, while reducing those tiresome false alarms.
领英推荐
Why Does this Shift Matter?
Simply put, cyber threats are no longer just tech challenges. They're business challenges. As threats become more sophisticated and pervasive, playing catch-up isn't enough. Organizations need a forward-leaning stance, anticipating and addressing threats in real-time, in line with business priorities. Proactive SOCs embody this stance, ensuring businesses don't just respond, but stay a step ahead.
Want to know more about what makes a Next Generation SOC? Stay Tuned!
For our next SOCtober article at Senthorus, join us as we talk about the ever-so-slight difference between inconsistent expertise and actually knowing what one is doing. Next up, a thrilling exposé on why having top-notch SOC Analysts might be a decent idea.
Fun fact: SOCs are not specialized socks to keep our feet warm. Who knew? We did, eventually… ??
CISSP | Security Architect | Hurt me with the truth but never comfort me with a lie
1 年Proactive Attack Surface Reduction and Threat Hunting are existing features and services many customers already have with their solutions of choice. Unfortunately, many customers do not leverage the full potential of their existing solutions. This is exactly where a Managed Detection & Response service (MDR) can be of value for customers, as it can cover configuration and operational gaps or even support with the general continuous improvements of the managed security tools and platforms!
Major Account Manager - Cybersecurity | 100% focused on delivering value to my clients
1 年Great points. Classic enterprise security tends to be highly reactive, but indeed that’s starting to change with the adoption of attack surface management and attack surface risk management approaches. It’s still relatively early days, but SOC teams have a lot to gain by building more of this kind of proactivity into their operating procedures and the good news is it’s fairly easy to do.