Social Value At Nil Cost...

Social Value At Nil Cost...

In UK public sector procurement, the expectation that social value should be delivered at nil cost reflects a broader trend where contracting authorities want suppliers to integrate social value into their service delivery without adding to the overall contract cost. The rationale is that social value — actions benefiting communities, the environment, or society — should be seen as an inherent aspect of corporate responsibility, not something with a separate price tag.

What This Really Means

  1. Embedding Social Value into Core Operations: Contracting authorities expect bidders to consider social value as part of their everyday operations, rather than as an optional add-on. For example, hiring local apprentices, reducing carbon emissions, or supporting local community initiatives are expected to be seamlessly integrated into service delivery.
  2. Non-Costed Social Value Commitments: Authorities want to see concrete plans and outcomes for social value that don't necessarily require additional budget allocations. For instance, they might expect a company to engage in volunteerism during business hours or prioritize sustainable procurement practices — aspects that can often be embedded at relatively low cost if planned strategically.
  3. Long-Term, Indirect Benefits: The idea is that social value creates long-term, indirect benefits, both for the community and potentially for the supplier (in reputation, employee morale, etc.), and should therefore be part of a supplier's long-term value proposition rather than a direct line item cost.

Is It Realistic and Reasonable?

This expectation can be seen as both challenging and, in some respects, reasonable, depending on the perspective:

  1. Challenging for SMEs and Resource-Intensive Commitments: For smaller suppliers, especially SMEs, delivering meaningful social value at nil cost can be unrealistic. These businesses may lack the resources to absorb extra activities like community engagement or sustainability initiatives without affecting their bottom line. It may be particularly challenging when commitments require significant time, training, or resource allocation — for instance, setting up a carbon reduction plan or implementing comprehensive diversity and inclusion programs.
  2. Motivating Innovation and Responsibility: On the other hand, this expectation drives innovation and encourages suppliers to think more creatively about social impact. For some companies, especially larger ones, certain social value activities may be built into their existing operational budgets and thus manageable without additional costs. For example, a large company with an established CSR program might be able to allocate staff volunteer time or use resources more sustainably as part of its ongoing commitments.
  3. Balancing Expectations with Practicality: In reality, some social value activities inherently come with costs, and there can be tension between the ambition of the social value model and the practical realities of delivering it at no cost. While public sector organizations are under pressure to deliver maximum value within tight budgets, a more reasonable approach might involve an openness to minimal additional costs for well-defined, impactful social value initiatives, particularly those requiring expertise, ongoing management, or infrastructure changes.

One Does What One Can, Not What One Can't...

In the realm of social value, impactful change doesn’t require grand gestures; it begins with small, meaningful actions rooted in a sincere commitment to bettering communities and the environment. Recognising that every organisation has unique strengths and resources, social value is about leveraging what is feasible and practical within one’s means rather than striving for unattainable ideals. It’s about focusing on achievable contributions, whether that’s offering skills-based volunteering, adopting sustainable practices, or supporting local employment. By embracing this principle, organisations can create real, lasting value, working steadily within their capabilities to uplift others and promote resilience. Social value grows not from the pursuit of perfection but from the dedicated and consistent efforts to make a difference where it’s possible, one step at a time.

While the nil-cost expectation reflects a push for more socially responsible business practices, it isn’t always practical, especially for smaller suppliers. A balanced approach that acknowledges some social value activities come with costs could foster more meaningful and sustainable social impact, making it a more feasible and fair expectation across the board.

#????????????????????????

About the Author

Omar Hadjel MCIM is an accomplished marketing consultant, bid support specialist, and certified sustainability advisor. With a career focused on helping organisations in both the private and public sectors secure contracts and enhance their sustainability initiatives, Omar brings a unique blend of strategic insight, environmental awareness, and practical guidance to his clients. His expertise spans bid writing, social value strategy, and sustainability reporting, empowering businesses to align with industry standards and demonstrate their commitment to social and environmental responsibility.

As a member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing and a GRI Certified Sustainability Professional, Omar leverages his knowledge to advise on ESG strategies and public contract readiness, assisting companies in navigating complex procurement landscapes. With a passion for making impactful contributions, Omar also regularly shares insights through thought leadership articles and workshops aimed at enhancing business resilience and fostering sustainable growth.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了