Social Risks, Social Determinants, & Fundamental Causes: At Which Level Should the Health Care System Intervene?
Philip M. A.
Founding Director, AAMC Center for Health Justice at Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)
Answer: All 3. The crucial question is “How?”
Often these terms and others – social risk, social factor, social need, social correlate, social determinant – are conflated and muddled, obscuring which interventions and strategies are likely to have the desired impact.
The draft figure below (please suggest edits and additions!) delineates some actions that hospitals and health systems might take across these three levels to improve health outcomes, address social factors, and mitigate inequities.
Social Risk
The provision of equitable, culturally responsive care to all regardless of ability to pay is the basic building block of how health care can address economic risk and the social disadvantage related to being from a minority community (broadly defined) in the United States.
In addition, hospitals are increasingly screening and making referrals for social risk to ensure patients are connected to relevant community assets and social services. Often overlooked, employee wellness programs – health care is often the largest employer in a given community – can also be focused on prevalent social risks. When scaled and appropriately funded, these referral and employee-based strategies can yield data and momentum that may start to move the needle on…
Social Determinants
Health care organizations are almost universally excellent conveners and routinely find themselves invited to community coalitions, Boards, work groups etc. Helping to build these coalitions (not necessarily to lead them!) is a crucial way that hospitals can contribute to community-based efforts to mobilize for policies and structures that address the unjust distribution of resources (housing, food, education, etc.) across our communities.
Coalitions are also crucial in crafting successful community health needs assessments (CHNAs) and subsequent community health improvement plans (CHIPs) to address community-prioritized health needs, including the SDOH. (AAMC’s own research has shown that taken together the SDOH are the 5th most often CHNA-prioritized health need.)
Finally, “anchor institution” policies – local procurement, local hiring, local investing – adds to the economic vitality of local neighborhoods: Community wealth is community health. These kinds of investments also set the tone and tenor for the health care organization itself, the starting point of efforts that address…
Fundamental Causes
No health care organization can eradicate racism or poverty or homophobia in its community. It can, however, work to address racism and poverty and homophobia within its own walls. Fomenting a culture of inclusion (and allotting the necessary resources and incentives to get there), ensuring local living wages and pay equity for staff, using its own data and expertise to identify and eliminate health care inequities all set a tone that reflects a commitment to equity.
Walking the walk in this way will increase the impact of advocacy efforts to promote social justice both within the health care organization and at local, state, and Federal levels. Health care already has a loud voice. Efforts like the above can pitch it toward social justice.
--------
By understanding what we’re trying to intervene on – risk, determinant or cause – we can ‘right size’ our interventions (and evaluations!) to build the evidence base of what works to close health and health care inequities and promote social justice in our organizations and in our communities.
Junior Leadership Member at Mom's Allyship Against Racism
5 年If you're not familiar with the ACE study and research I urge you to look into it. It absolutely connects with the issues mentioned in your article. Also, ACES Connection is a great resource for health care providers and other public service oriented orgs.?https://www.acesconnectioninfo.com/
Assistant Vice President for Clinical Education Development, A.T. Still University
5 年Philip, Excellent article!? AAMC CHARGE should be looking at this.?
Corporate Social Responsibility & Stakeholder Engagement | Strategy, Planning, Implementation | Anchor Institutions
5 年Glad to see the link to?social?risk...I'm trying to make that argument these days on?healthcare?Anchors! ?Having led several social risk assessments, I agree with Eric. ?The graphic above states the social risk as "I don't have stable housing," which starts to muddle the risk. ?I'd restate it as an unwanted event: lack of stable housing. ?The real risk is on society and the economy (the consequences of the unwanted event: homelessness, lack of workforce, increased health incidence due to mold/asthma, etc.). ?Keeping with the risk theme are causes, which I think you have above but could also be further contextualized. ?Adding a little on controls (the existing ways to minimize unwanted events from happening) provides a much more analytical and systematic way of looking at a problem, and determine where those controls fall short and where an Anchor Institution can help fill the gap (activities that augment existing housing programs). ?Standardized likelihood and impact ratings could be addressed to get an 'objective' risk rating that Anchors could use to identify priorities. Overtly connecting the dots on why something is a risk can really open people's eyes as to why its a problem for everyone: “There is a risk of [unwanted event] caused by [the identified causes] leading to [some consequence(s) to the business (or in this case the community or society)].”? Taking a social risk perspective is, in my view, important for the Anchor movement, especially in healthcare, for the reasons you describe: addressing the problem through coalitions and via convening other civil society stakeholders through a systems approach, who are also affected by the risk. ?It also enables the Anchor to address risks limiting their business objectives (eg inadequate workforce due to poor housing, un-insured populations) while addressing equity, critical community needs, and improving SDoH. ?Addressing both self-interests of the healthcare provider, and broader utilitarian interests can help sway key leaders across sectors to join in.
Tribal Public Health Officer, Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc.
5 年My suggestion is to add 2 more layers of granularity. I think 'social risk' becomes 'social need,' when what someone is at increased risk for is realized. Since, it's a 'social risk' I don't think this necessarily involves healthcare. It could rather be food insecurity or housing insecurity. "Social needs" then become "clinical" or "healthcare" needs when they become physical health problems. Like the housing insecurity leads to pneumonia, or the food insecurity leads to heart disease or diabetes. For reference, and more ideas, I highly recommend Nancy Kreiger's book, Epidemiology and the People's Health which describes different epi approaches to determinants as seen through a research lens.? ?