So what's it like, and what does it mean, to be a finalist at the Nursing Times Awards 2018?

So what's it like, and what does it mean, to be a finalist at the Nursing Times Awards 2018?

Early in 2018 I thought it would be good to showcase the research work we do and so I decided to nominate our research team at the East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust for the Nursing Times 2018 Awards. Little did I know the journey this would take us on and what it would give us to improve what we do and to help others.

We didn't win but we were a finalist. Don't get me wrong it would be nice to have won but research in the NHS, which seeks to enhance patient outcome and experience, is not about individuals beating others. It is about us, working as a community, to deliver the evidence base to improve future ways of treating patients.

NHS patients were the real winners of the Nursing Times Awards and you can see some video of what it is like for patients to be a research participant here.

If you want to look at the winners and photos from the 2018 Nursing Times Awards then you can click here. Huge congratulations to Solent Trust and all the other finalists.

If you want to read our story then please continue... But if you want to know what it's like - it's absolutely fantastic! And what does it mean - well it means more than you might at first think.

What did we learn from this?

  1. There is so much great stuff going on out there and it makes sense to learn from each other - the National Institute for Health Research made a special effort to bring all the finalists in the clinical research nursing category together. Hopefully this will make it easier for us to share good practice and learn from each other.
  2. When we work in our own area we often tend to focus on how we want to improve things, how things could be better and the challenges that we need to overcome. Our drive for continual improvement can sometimes be at the expenses of actually recognising what we have achieved. The review of our progress over the last two years and writing the nomination forced us to look back over and acknowledge all that we have done.
  3. Having highly respected external colleagues say that we have done a good job has been such powerful motivating factor. As human beings it is really great for us to hear somebody else say we've done a great job!
  4. Research can only take place with the involvement of a very large number of people and, of course, through those that wish to take part. We are very grateful for all the individual efforts that make this possible.

So what was our nomination?

The following slides provide an overview of our nomination which can be summarised as:

  1. We developed a research strategy to enhance patient outcome and experience through research and innovation.
  2. A key element of this was to ensure that research nurses could work together as a team, and as part of a multi-specialty group.
  3. We have developed a pathway so that staff can progress and reach their research potential.

The research strategy has had a dramatic and sustained effect on research activity - which has dramatically increased, become more widespread across different healthcare areas and the number of studies offered has increased. All this enhances patient outcome and experience through research and innovation.

If you would like to find out more about research at East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust then please visit our website.

Paul Roberts

NIHR BioResource - Senior Study Coordinator

6 年

My comments are positive and appreciative of MY local hospital. When you take all things into account; participation and increase in total ABF, what you have reported is a 50% increase over 2 years. Thanks again. Look I raised a valid comment on quality that is worthy of reflection and not dismissal. Took a few minutes for me to produce and my comments were based on the stated caveats in my discussion. How do you measure quality and value for money as part of your strategy? Surely intrinsic quality of research supported is central to the headline improving patient outcome component of your strategy's tagline. Keen to see your graph depicting quality using the multitude of hard data at your disposal. Happy to eat my hat!

回复
Oksana Hoile

Health Research Management/Service Transformation Specialist

6 年

Truly deserved! Congratulations to you Phil and your colleagues

回复
Paul Roberts

NIHR BioResource - Senior Study Coordinator

6 年

Speaking as an informed North Herts patient can I say congratulations Phil et al on reporting the increase in patient participation, number of studies supported and spread of research engaged specialities over the past two years on what was already a very broad research active organisation. I always like to view research impact linked to quantity (number of participants/studies supported), quality (complexity of research supported) and value for money (resources available) rather than just against quantity alone as I find the former lacks 'context' in isolation.? To me the greater the quality (more studies where we are actually changing the care pathway through research) then the greater patient outcome and experience can flow. Presuming the R&D income (staffing) has remained constant throughout the 5 years reported above to see a 73% increase in participants recruited (15/16 to 17/18) against just a 14% decrease in research quality (average NIHR activity based funding weighting) is a commendable trade off when seeking to get more clinical colleagues / departments engaged. The challenge for the strategy over the coming year is to build on these excellent foundations and grow quality back to the level the Trust got to previously (2013-2016).

  • 该图片无替代文字
回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了