Smart Cities 3.0: The Future of Urban Innovation and Transformation

Introduction

The concept of "smart cities" has evolved significantly over the past decade. What started as a vision to leverage information and communication technologies to improve urban infrastructure and services (Smart Cities 1.0) has expanded to focus more holistically on enhancing quality of life, economic competitiveness, sustainability, and citizen engagement through data-driven decision making and solutions co-created with stakeholders (Smart Cities 2.0).

Now, leading metropolises around the world are moving towards an even more advanced paradigm - Smart Cities 3.0. In this new era, cities aren't just deploying an array of smart technologies and data analytics in silos. Rather, they are taking an integrated, human-centric approach to digital transformation, with initiatives spanning sectors, jurisdictions and stakeholder groups. Artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, blockchain, digital twins and other emerging technologies are being woven into the very fabric of how cities are planned, built and experienced.

At the same time, the governance frameworks, business models, talent pipelines, and citizen participation mechanisms required for impactful smart city development are maturing. These advancements are enabling a new generation of use cases that demonstrate meaningful return on investment and tangible improvements to urban life. However, as the smart cities movement progresses from pilots and proofs-of-concept to larger-scale, mainstream implementation, cities are also grappling with an evolving set of technical, financial, organizational and ethical challenges.

This article aims to capture the current state of practice in smart city development worldwide. It examines the key characteristics of Smart Cities 3.0, showcases global best practices, and shares insights from personal and business case studies. It also explores metrics for gauging smart city progress and return on investment, identifies critical challenges, and outlines a high-level roadmap for advancing smart city maturity. The goal is to provide urban leaders, solution providers, researchers and practitioners a comprehensive yet practical overview of how cities are leveraging the latest technologies and management approaches to become more livable, sustainable, resilient and prosperous.

Key Characteristics of Smart Cities 3.0

While there is no single blueprint for a "smart city 3.0", a review of leading examples from around the world reveals several defining traits:

Citizen-centricity: Smart city 3.0 initiatives are anchored in a deep understanding of citizens' and businesses' needs, preferences and concerns. Human-centered design principles guide technology development and deployment. Solutions aim to empower people and improve their urban experience and wellbeing in very tangible ways - from personalizing city services to an individual's unique circumstances to using behavioral nudges to promote more sustainable choices. Importantly, citizens are not just passive recipients but active co-creators - they have a voice in identifying challenges, ideating solutions, and providing real-time feedback.

Integration and interoperability: Smart Cities 3.0 break down data silos within and between city departments and achieve seamless connectivity across disparate systems. Initiatives often span traditional domains like transport, public safety, utilities, healthcare and education. Open standards and APIs, shared data platforms, and collaborative agreements enable an ecosystem of partners - startups, academia, nonprofits, corporations, other government entities - to build and scale solutions together. Interoperable technologies also allow a city's digital infrastructure to adapt as new innovations emerge.

Intelligent automation: In Smart Cities 3.0, artificial intelligence is moving out of the lab and into real-world applications that make city systems more autonomous and adaptive. Machine learning algorithms process massive volumes of data from IoT sensors, mobile phones, and other sources to optimize energy and resource consumption, traffic flows, building performance, and myriad other facets of the urban environment in real-time. Robotic process automation streamlines back-office workflows. Chatbots and virtual assistants provide 24/7 citizen services. Predictive analytics enables proactive maintenance of critical assets and early intervention for issues ranging from air pollution to public safety risks.

Cybersecurity and privacy protection: As cities become more digitized and data-driven, safeguarding critical infrastructure, sensitive information and personal privacy is paramount. Smart Cities 3.0 have robust cybersecurity strategies and governance frameworks that keep pace with a constantly evolving threat landscape. Security and privacy controls are built into systems and processes by design. Cities are transparent about what data they collect, how it is used and shared, and give citizens agency over their personal information.

Agile and inclusive governance: Smart city 3.0 development is guided by strong leadership as well as inclusive and agile governance processes. CIOs and CDOs work hand-in-hand with elected officials, city managers and citizens to define a clear smart city vision and roadmap tied to strategic priorities. Cross-departmental structures are created to manage smart city projects and break down organizational silos. Procurement, budgeting and funding mechanisms are adapted to support agile, iterative solution development. Policies evolve in step with technological change. Capacity building and digital literacy programs equip city staff and residents to fully participate in co-creating the smart city.

Evidence-based impact: Rigorous impact assessment is core to Smart cities 3.0. Projects are grounded in baseline data and have clearly defined, measurable KPIs aligned with city goals. Real-time and periodic reporting dashboards track progress. Sophisticated data analytics, often enhanced by machine learning, provide a deeper understanding of what's working, what's not, for whom and why. Successful solutions are scaled based on evidence of their technical feasibility, financial viability and ability to deliver tangible quality of life improvements equitably.

Replicability and scalability: Smart city 3.0 solutions are designed with scale in mind from the outset. Standard templates, sharable components and best practice guides enable faster and more efficient replication both within a city and from city to city. Vendor-agnostic, modular designs avoid lock-in and allow cities to mix and match solutions as needs evolve. Code, data, use cases and lessons learned are shared in open repositories. Regional, national and global networks facilitate knowledge exchange and collaborative problem-solving among cities.

Sustainable and resilient: Smart Cities 3.0 harness digital technologies to transition to a low-carbon, resource-efficient, socially-inclusive future. Data-driven approaches spur the development of green buildings, renewable energy systems, electrified transportation and the circular economy. Nature-based solutions like biophilic design and urban forests are integrated into the built environment. Climate resilience is a key consideration in urban planning and infrastructure decisions. Social inclusion and equitable access to smart city benefits are proactively addressed.

International Use Cases

Cities around the globe are putting the principles of Smart Cities 3.0 into practice with inspiring use cases:

Citizen Engagement and Co-Creation

Barcelona, Spain has established the decidim.barcelona platform to engage citizens in ideating, developing and voting on smart city proposals. Initiatives like the Municipal Data Office and Citizen Data Commons empower people with control over their personal data.

Taoyuan, Taiwan has systematized innovation challenges, hackathons, workshops and other participatory activities to develop and pilot smart city solutions that address citizens' real problems as conveners of grassroots experts. Projects have spanned eldercare, urban mobility and disaster preparedness.

Health and Well-being

The Barcelona Medical Emergency Service has implemented an AI-powered early warning system to predict ambulance demand. This has enabled a 10–40% reduction in response times, improving citizens' health outcomes.

Tel Aviv, Israel has empowered high-risk patients to self-monitor their vitals using wearables and home medical devices connected to the city's digital health platform. This enables proactive alerts to health providers and personalized AI-driven care recommendations.

Mobility

Helsinki, Finland has developed the Whim app, which uses machine learning to unify access to all the city's mobility options - buses, trains, ride-hailing, bikes, e-scooters and autos. The app learns users' preferences and optimizes route suggestions, enables seamless multimodal journey planning and digital ticketing.

Hamburg, Germany has established an intelligent transportation system, using real-time sensors and predictive modeling to optimize the flow of traffic and emergency vehicles, reduce energy use and accidents. It is integrated with smart electric vehicle charging infrastructures.

Energy and Environment

Copenhagen, Denmark aims to become the first carbon-neutral city by 2025 through holistic digitally-enabled solutions. Initiatives include intelligent building management systems, smart streetlights, AI-optimized district heating, integrated renewable energy, and smart waste management.

Singapore is developing a digital twin "Virtual Singapore" that will model energy and climate impacts to inform urban planning decisions in areas such as solar deployments. It has also harnessed IoT, robotics and analytics to transform itself into a "City in a Garden".

Public Safety and Security

The City of Oakland, California has deployed an AI-enabled gunshot detection solution as part of a comprehensive Smart Public Safety program. Audio data is captured and instantly analyzed to triangulate the location of gunfire, enabling swifter and more targeted emergency response.

The City of The Hague has developed the Living Lab Scheveningen, where it is testing smart public safety solutions in partnership with citizens, law enforcement and startups. Solutions include smart cameras, acoustic aggression detectors, and crowd monitoring to enable early intervention in high-risk situations.

Inclusivity and Social Services

The City of Kobe, Japan has developed an AI chatbot that converts government communications into "easy Japanese" to better serve foreign residents with limited language skills. It is part of a broader "Inclusive Kobe" smart city initiative aimed at using technology to support the elderly, disabled, and other often marginalized groups.

Leeds, UK has created a comprehensive smart city digital inclusion program in collaboration with the Good Things Foundation. At its core is a network of digitally trained community-based "Digital Champions" who provide one-to-one support to residents who lack digital access or skills.

Governance and Citizen Services

In a groundbreaking example of smarter government, Estonia allows citizens and business to access 99% of public services online through its " e-Estonia" platform. The platform is underpinned by secure data sharing infrastructures like X-Road and e-ID that save more than 1400 years of working time annually.

Dubai has taken the idea of digital public services even further, setting an ambitious goal of having 100% of all government transactions conducted through online or smartphone channels by 2023. Government agencies have rapidly digitized services and are now using AI, blockchain and IoT to make processes more efficient, secure and autonomous.

Economic Development & Competitiveness

Busan, South Korea has implemented a wide-ranging digitally-enabled economic revitalization program. At its center is the Seomyeon IoT Street Lab, where tech startups, companies and researchers experiment with IoT/data solutions for challenges like traffic, crime prevention and tourism.

Stockholm, Sweden's smart city strategy is tightly linked with programs to strengthen the innovation ecosystem and digital economy. GrowSmarter, Digital Demo Stockholm, and OpenLab are just a few of the city's platforms for open data, pilots, co-creation between industry, academia, government and citizens.

Personal and Business Case Studies

Diving deeper into individual experiences provides valuable insights into the transformative impact of Smart Cities 3.0 on people's lives and livelihoods. Consider the personal case study of Soo-yeon, a working mother in Seoul, South Korea:

Soo-yeon's mornings used to be a hectic scramble of getting her daughter ready for school while battling traffic to make it to her job on time. Seoul's smart city data platform changed that. It powers an intelligent transportation app that provides Soo-yeon with personalized commuting recommendations based on real-time traffic, weather, and public transit data.

The app might suggest that Soo-yeon leave 10 minutes earlier than usual to avoid a forecasted congestion spike or that she drive to a smart parking garage near a metro station and ride the rest of the way due to a delay on her normal bus route. On good weather days, it will identify bike-friendly routes. It even syncs with her daughter's school calendar and suggests alternatives if there is an event that will snarl school-zone traffic.

These little nudges add up - saving Soo-yeon time, stress and fuel costs. The app also gamifies her commute, awarding points for green mobility choices that she can redeem for transit discounts and other incentives. For Soo-yeon, Seoul's smart mobility solution means a more livable city and greater peace of mind.

Or take the example of Nuru, a small business owner in Kigali, Rwanda. Nuru runs a produce distribution company, connecting small farmers with hotels, restaurants and supermarkets. Traditionally, Nuru had to physically visit each farmer and buyer to assess supply and demand, and deliveries were frequently disrupted by vehicle breakdowns on Kigali's congested roads. A smart city logistics platform transformed Nuru's business.

Developed as a public-private partnership between the City of Kigali, the World Bank and local tech firms, the platform harnesses IoT sensors to track the location and capacity of Nuru's delivery trucks in real-time. It uses machine learning to predict the fill-rates of local markets and dynamically optimize delivery routes and schedules.

Nuru can now see at a glance on his smartphone if there is a traffic jam, road closure or market surplus and adjust his fleet's movements accordingly. No more rotting produce or angry chefs. He can also access performance dashboards and forecasting tools to make more informed decisions about when and where to expand his business.

The platform has enabled Nuru to grow his revenue by 150%, while cutting costs and doubling his network of farmers and buyers. For other small businesses it has offered lower-cost entry into the formalized economy via a transparent smart city marketplace. Consumers see less food waste and more reliable supplies of fresh, locally-sourced produce.

Metrics and ROI

Soo-Yeon and Nuru's stories illustrate how smart city solutions deliver meaningful quality of life and economic benefits at the individual and business level. But how can cities more comprehensively measure progress and return on investment? Smart Cities 3.0 take a multi-pronged approach, blending traditional key performance indicators with new ones made possible by digital technologies:

Citizen satisfaction: Most smart cities start with baseline measures of citizen satisfaction with city services and quality of life drawn from surveys, sentiment analysis of social media data, and other channels. CDOs and CIOs have specific citizen satisfaction targets (e.g. 90% rating of "good or excellent") tied to their smart city projects.

Quality of life indices: Cities increasingly use or develop their own quality of life and well-being indices that combine both subjective and objective smart city liveability measures - from economic and educational opportunity to health and environmental quality to civic engagement.

Digital service adoption: A key ROI measure for smart city e-services is user adoption - what percentage of the eligible population is actively using a given service? Cities like Dubai have set 80% adoption targets for individual services and measure progress through web/mobile analytics.

Service efficiency: Smart technologies should make city services more responsive and less costly. Many cities track metrics like average response times, percentage of issues resolved at first point of contact, and cost savings from digitization of services. Singapore's Online and eServices Efficiency Index assesses over 300 e-services on cost and process efficiency.

Infrastructure optimization: Smart city projects often aim to optimize the performance of physical infrastructures like roads, pipes and power grids. Cities track indicators such as road congestion, water leakage rates, energy consumption per capita, and the percentage of systems monitored and automatically optimized in real-time.

Digital equity and inclusion: As cities invest in smart technologies, it is critical to ensure these benefits reach all residents. Inclusion metrics track progress towards universal and affordable broadband access, digital literacy and participation in smart city solutions across socioeconomic, demographic and geographic lines.

Sustainability: Most cities have established greenhouse gas reduction, renewable energy, water conservation, waste diversion and other "green" targets as part of climate action plans. Leading smart cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have dashboards that track the contribution of specific digital solutions to these goals.

Open data economic value: Open data is central to smart city innovation. Cities are attempting to quantify open data's cumulative economic value through studies on metrics like data set downloads, app development, business creation, and high-value use cases enabled.

Cybersecurity: With more smart city services and data come added vulnerabilities. Many cities now include cybersecurity key risk indicators - such as number of incidents, average response time, percentage of systems with latest security updates - alongside traditional IT measures.

Innovation ecosystem: Cities recognize that nurturing a vibrant innovation ecosystem is key to sustained smart city competitiveness. They track metrics like venture capital investment, STEM graduates, new business formation, patent filings and other innovation inputs and outputs.

While measurement is essential for demonstrating the ROI of individual smart city projects, leading cities are also thinking more holistically about benchmarking their overall "smart city maturity". They are adopting or developing smart city indexes and capability maturity frameworks to more systematically assess their strengths, gaps and progress across interrelated dimensions like governance, infrastructure, data and innovation. From Barcelona to Bangalore, cities are collaborating with academia and the private sector on next generation smart city standards and evaluation tools that will bring new rigor and comparability to investment impacts.

Challenges

While the potential benefits of Smart Cities 3.0 are immense, so too are the challenges that municipalities must navigate to realize them. Many of these hurdles are not new but are evolving and intensifying as cities move from experimentation to larger-scale implementation:

Financing and business models: Securing adequate and sustainable funding for ambitious, cross-cutting smart city programs is a persistent challenge worldwide. Most national and local governments lack dedicated smart city budgets. Public-private partnerships, concessions, and value capture mechanisms are helping to unlock new investment, but deal flow remains slow. Procurement rules designed for one-off, bespoke projects do not align well with the need for agile, iterative solution development. Innovative business models that monetize and share the risks/rewards of smart city data and solutions are nascent. Siloed departmental budgets impede holistic smart city planning and investment.

Interoperability and integration: While Smart Cities 3.0 aim to break down data silos, achieving interoperability and integration between new and legacy city systems is a complex undertaking. It requires significant upfront investment in IoT infrastructure, data standards, middleware platforms, APIs and data sharing agreements. Integrating systems across jurisdictional boundaries (e.g. metro area transportation networks) adds another layer of technical and institutional complexity. Keeping up with the accelerating pace of technological change and cybersecurity risks is challenging.

Digital skills and capacity: As city infrastructures and services become "smarter", so too must the civil servants who plan, procure, deploy and manage them. Yet acute shortages of staff with data science, software engineering, cloud architecture, cybersecurity, user experience design and other digital skills are common pain points. Chief Data Officers are often under-resourced. Upskilling and reskilling existing staff is just as critical as attracting new tech talent to government, but training budgets lag needs. The public sector's inability to match private sector IT salaries remains an obstacle.

Privacy and ethical concerns: Smart city technologies like ubiquitous sensors, facial recognition, and predictive algorithms are bringing surveillance and privacy risks into sharp focus. Establishing the legal, policy and governance frameworks to safeguard citizen data, prevent misuse, and build public trust is an ongoing challenge. Concerns about algorithmic bias and opacity in automated city decision-making systems are rising. Ethical debates on acceptable boundaries for smart city tech (e.g. law enforcement) are politically charged. Clearer industry standards and regulations are needed.

Digital divide and inclusion: COVID-19 laid bare the stark digital inequalities within and across communities. An estimated 3.7 billion people globally lack access to the internet. Gaps in digital literacy and device access often map to deeper socioeconomic and geographic disparities. As more city services and engagement opportunities move online, ensuring that underserved populations are not left behind is both a technical and political imperative. From multilingual digital services to wifi in public housing, cities need comprehensive digital equity strategies.

Institutional silos and fragmentation: Breaking smart city initiatives out of the IT department and into the mainstream of city planning, management and service delivery is a common struggle. Lack of a strong, high-level smart city governance structure is a frequent barrier. Even when a central smart city office exists, coordination across different levels of government and jurisdictional boundaries is challenging. Cities continue to lack integrated, cross-departmental data and KPI dashboards to inform smart urbanization decisions holistically.

Sustained leadership and agility: The long-term, cross-cutting nature of smart city transformation requires sustained political and executive leadership. Yet high turnover of elected officials and city managers is common. Maintaining momentum and navigating complex stakeholder politics across political cycles is tough. Rigid bureaucratic cultures and processes are often at odds with the agility, experimentation and risk-taking needed for impactful digital innovation. Cities are grappling with how to institutionalize new ways of working.

Future Outlook

Despite these challenges, the future outlook for Smart Cities 3.0 is promising. Rapid urbanization, climate change, citizen demands for better services and other powerful societal forces will continue to drive the smart city imperative forward. Several key enablers are converging to accelerate progress:

Technological maturity: After a decade of hype, the foundational technologies powering smart cities are reaching maturity. The cost of sensors, connectivity, and computing power continues to drop as capabilities rise. 5G and edge AI will enable new real-time smart city applications. Digital twin, AR/VR, and self-driving vehicle pilots are moving into real-world deployments. Blockchain is opening up new frontiers in the Internet of Things. As innovation accelerates, cities will have more mature, secure and scalable solutions to draw from.

Data and AI governance: Trusted frameworks for governing the torrent of smart city data are solidifying. More cities are appointing Chief Data Officers, implementing well-designed open data policies, and using privacy-preserving tools. The EU's GDPR is inspiring similar data protection laws worldwide. AI ethics principles and impact assessment frameworks are gaining adherents. Concepts like privacy-by-design, algorithmic transparency and data trusts/commons are diffusing into smart city projects and vendor offerings. While still a work in progress, the "rules of the road" for responsible smart city data/AI use are getting clearer.

Financing solutions: While securing sustainable smart city financing at scale remains a challenge, new models are emerging. Outcomes-based contracting and other pay-for-performance structures are starting to align incentives and share risks/rewards more effectively in public-private partnerships. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors are increasing allocations to smart sustainable infrastructure as an attractive asset class. Philanthropies like Rockefeller, Omidyar and Bloomberg are stepping up catalytic capital for smart city innovation.

Interoperability standards: The race to establish smart city standards is accelerating. Industry and government consortia like Open & Agile Smart Cities (OASC), IEEE Smart Cities, and the BSI are developing reference frameworks and harmonized data models to enable interoperable, replicable solutions. The G20 Global Smart Cities Alliance is promoting greater convergence around a core set of shared principles. As cities align around common standards, solution development cycles will shorten and the business case for investment will strengthen.

Agile governance: More cities are adopting agile methods and digital tools to break down silos, streamline processes, and accelerate smart solution delivery. User-centered design, open innovation challenges, regulatory sandboxes, and co-creation with residents are becoming normalized. Cities are also banding together in peer networks to share learnings, co-develop solutions, and amplify their voice with technology providers and policymakers. As urban governance becomes more data-driven and responsive, trust and engagement in smart city initiatives has the potential to grow.

Roadmap

What will it take to advance more cities up the Smart Cities 3.0 maturity curve in the coming years? While there is no one-size-fits-all playbook, successful strategies often include:

Codify a bold, citizen-centric smart city vision and guiding principles linked to mayoral priorities. Back the vision with a strong governance model (e.g. smart city steering committee) and integrated implementation roadmap that cuts across siloes. Communicate wins early and often to sustain political and public support.

Audit the city's current data assets, flows and governance. Implement well-designed data policies that safeguard privacy/security, incentivize internal and external data sharing, and create a single source of truth to enable a holistic, real-time view of city performance across departments and KPIs.

Build the city's innovation capacity through initiatives like digital skills training for staff, innovation challenges, urban living labs, and collaboration with local universities and startups. Cultivate an ecosystem of partners to co-develop, test and scale cutting-edge solutions faster than the city could on its own.

Implement a common, cloud-based smart city digital platform adhering to open standards. Start with a few cross-cutting use cases that allow the city to learn by doing and demonstrate ROI before expanding the platform to other domains. Ensure robust cybersecurity and API-enabled modularity to prevent vendor lock-in.

Adopt a portfolio approach to smart city finance. Blend traditional funding sources like municipal bonds and infrastructure banks with more catalytic instruments like green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, and outcomes-based contracts. Explore revenue-sharing models around commercializing smart city data insights.

Define smart city success through the eyes of citizens and businesses. Continuously measure what matters to people through surveys, co-design workshops, social sentiment analysis and other engagement channels. Develop interactive dashboards that visualize real-time progress against key quality of life and economic metrics.

Share and scale what works through active participation in regional, national and global smart city networks. Open source code, learnings and best practices. Collaborate with other cities to establish common data standards and pilot shared solutions. Shape the broader enabling environment needed for collective impact.

Conclusion

The growing number of standout Smart Cities 3.0 successes worldwide offer a glimpse of the immense potential for data and technology to make cities more liveable, sustainable, resilient and prosperous for all. From intelligent mobility in Taipei to predictive healthcare in Moscow to climate-responsive neighborhoods in Cantonments in Accra, cities across the development spectrum are demonstrating that a new paradigm of urban transformation is not only desirable, but doable.

But the hard truth is that most cities are still stuck in Smart Cities 1.0 mode, with a proliferation of pilots and standalone solutions that are not yet adding up to large-scale, integrated impact. Unlocking the full potential of Smart Cities 3.0 will require a step change in the social, economic and political enablers of urban innovation - from more nimble regulations and sustainable financing models to institutionalized multi-stakeholder collaboration and digitally-literate leadership at all levels of government and society.

For urban leaders and civic innovators, the challenge is to stay focused on the ultimate outcomes that make people's lives measurably better rather than getting caught up in the hype cycle of the latest big data platform or AI algorithm. To approach Smart Cities 3.0 not as a collection of tech solutions, but as a holistic, citizen-centric framework for mobilizing collective intelligence to solve our most pressing 21st century urban challenges.

The goal of a Smart City 3.0 is not to optimize the city as a machine, but to humanize the city as an organism - an ever-evolving, richly interconnected system of systems that reflects and responds to the incredible diversity and dynamism of urban life. When a single mother in Medellin can access health services more easily because the city can predict and proactively address her needs, that's a truly "smart" outcome. When a first-generation college student in Chicago launches a cleantech startup based on insights gleaned from the city's open energy data platform, that's a story worth scaling. When a senior citizen in Bandar Seri Begawan feels a bit less lonely and a bit more capable because a city AI chatbot is patiently guiding him to social connection opportunities in his native language, that's humanity at the center of smart city design.

The cities that will thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution will be those that harness technology as a tool to amplify rather than replace the distinctly human strengths of creativity, care, judgment and meaning-making. In this sense, the smartest cities of the future may not be those with the most sensors or the fastest broadband speeds or the slickest apps. They will be those that have mastered the art of creating enabling environments for people - all people - to learn, adapt, relate, create and flourish together as the currents of change reshape the urban landscape around them. They will be cities that have rediscovered the transformative power of putting collective human intelligence back at the heart of the smart cities movement, where it belongs.

References

Aelenei, Mihaela, et al. "From Legacy Systems to Smart City Applications." Sustainability 13.2 (2021)

Barns, Sarah. "Smart cities, algorithmic governance and the role of urban observatories." City, Culture and Society (2021): 14.

Bibri, Simon Elias. "Data-driven Smart Sustainable Cities of The Future: An Evidence Synthesis Approach to A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Literature Review." Sustainable Cities and Society (2022): 31.

Caird, Sally P., and Stephen H. Hallett. "Towards evaluation design for smart city development." Journal of Urban Design 24 (2019).

Caprotti, Federico, et al. "Inside smart cities: Place, politics and urban innovation." Routledge, 2019.

Deloitte Insights. "Smart cities: The next stage." Deloitte (2021). www.deloitte.com/global/en/insights/industry/public-sector/next-stage-smart-cities.html

El-Haddadeh, Ramzi, et al. "Examining the complexities of value creation in sustainable smart city transitions." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 170 (2021): 120911.

GovLab. "Urban Intelligence Toolbox: 100 Solutions for City Challenges." www.urban-intelligence.org

G20 Global Smart Cities Alliance. "Global Policy Roadmap." 2021: www.globalsmartcitiesalliance.org/?p=1336

IEEE. "Smart Cities Framework." IEEE Smart Cities Technical Community. (2022): https://smartcities.ieee.org/framework

ITU. "United for Smart Sustainable Cities (U4SSC)." ITU. u4ssc.itu.int

Kumar, Harish et al. "Smart cities for sustainable development: A citizen-centric perspective." Sustainable Cities and Society (2022): 69.

Living-in.eu "Cities and Regions taking their digital futures into their own hands." www.living-in.eu

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, India. "Smart City Metrics." 2022: https://smartnet.niua.org/smart-solutions/smart-city-metrics

Ojo, Adegboyega, Edward Curry, and Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti. "A Tale of Open Data Innovations in Five Smart Cities." 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2015.

Prasad, Dhirendra, et al. "3Cs for E-Governance: Cost, Convenience, and Confidence." IEEE E-Governance Conference Proceedings 2020.

Robins, Carolin Schellhorn. "Governing the smart city: The Barcelona Model and the politics and ethics of digital urbanism." Planning Theory & Practice 22.2 (2021): 243-264.

Smart City Expo World Congress. "The 7 key topics for cities in 2023." Smart City (2022). www.smartcityexpo.com/en/topics-cities-2022

SmartCitiesWorld. "Smart city development goes beyond engineering, say experts." SmartCitiesWorld (2022). www.smartcitiesworld.net/smart-cities-news/smart-city-development-goes-beyond-engineering-say-experts-8360

United Nations. "World Urbanization Prospects 2018." (2019): population.un.org/wup

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. "A Guide to Circular Cities." 2022. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/ECE_RFSD_2022_5.pdf

World Economic Forum. "Top Ten Urban Innovations." 2021: www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Top_10_Urban_Innovations_report_2020.pdf

World Bank. "Smart Cities for All: A Vision for an Inclusive, Sustainable Urban Future." 2019: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/334251468188651025/pdf/110037-WP-PUBLIC-Smart-Cities-FINAL-low-res.pdf