Sixth Circuit Concludes Twice that Covid Shutdown Not Direct Physical Loss

Sixth Circuit Concludes Twice that Covid Shutdown Not Direct Physical Loss

Posted on October 1, 2021 by Barry Zalma

For Business Interruption Coverage there Must be Direct Physical Damage

After a trial court concluded that Zurich American must go to trial over a business interruption claim due to Covid shutdowns Zurich appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal that, in Santo’s Italian Café LLC v. Acuity Ins. Co., No. 21-3068, ___ F.4th ____, at *3 (6th Cir. Sept. 22, 2021) and in In re: Zurich American Insurance?Company, USCA, Sixth Circuit, Case: 1:20-cv-01239-DAP Doc #: 23 Filed : 09/30/21 that there must be direct physical loss of or damage to property.

The district court granted summary judgment to Plaintiffs on the insurance coverage issues asserted in their claims for breach of contract (Count I) and declaratory judgment (Count III), granted summary judgment to Zurich on Plaintiffs’ claim for bad faith denial of coverage (Count II), and certified the legal issue in Count I for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

The parties agreed that Zurich raises at least one controlling question of law for appeal: whether the policy’s coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to property” applies to Plaintiffs’ loss of business income due to COVID-19-related government shutdown orders that halted their dine-in operations. The parties also agreed that resolution of this question may materially affect Zurich’s liability and, thus, the outcome of the litigation below.

In granting summary judgment to Plaintiffs on Counts I and III, the district court reasoned that the COVID-19-related interruption of Plaintiffs’ dine-in operations amounted to “direct physical loss of or damage to [Plaintiffs’] property” under Ohio law.

The Sixth Circuit, since the trial court’s decision against Zurich, held, however, that “a pandemic-triggered government order, barring in-person dining at a restaurant” does not qualify as “‘direct physical loss of or damage to’ the property” under Ohio law: Santo’s Italian Café LLC v. Acuity Ins. Co., No. 21-3068, ___ F.4th ____, at *3 (6th Cir. Sept. 22, 2021).

Accordingly, the petition for permission to appeal is GRANTED, the district court’s order is VACATED as to the insurance coverage issue alleged in Counts I and III, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order and deny the plaintiffs’ motion.

ZALMA OPINION

These two decisions by the Sixth Circuit should stop trial courts – feeling sorry for the people losing money as a result of the governments’ actions forcing them to close their businesses and lose money. They tried to collect from their insurers and almost universally the courts have found no coverage in the U.S. No matter how sad their losses are the contract terms are clear and unambiguous and must be applied. Of course, the plaintiffs’ can try to sue the governmental entity that shut them down because it was an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as applied to the States and Cities by the 14th Amendment.

No alt text provided for this image

? 2021 – Barry Zalma

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders.

He also serves as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance related disputes. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business.

He is available at https://www.zalma.com and [email protected]. Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine/ACE Legend Award. Over the last 53 years Barry Zalma has dedicated his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created the following library of books and other materials to make it possible for insurers and their claims staff to become insurance claims professionals.

Go to my articles at https://zalma.substack.com,? the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma;?Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at https://www.rumble.com/zalma ; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg;?Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/?The last two issues of ZIFL are available at https://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/?podcast now available at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/zalma-on-insurance/id1509583809?uo=4

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE的更多文章

  • Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 15, 2025

    Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – March 15, 2025

    ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 6 The Ides of March Produces the Newest Issue of Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter The Source for…

  • “The Passover Seder For Americans”

    “The Passover Seder For Americans”

    Posted on March 14, 2025 by Barry Zalma For American Jews Who Can’t Read Hebrew & For Christians Who Want to Understand…

  • Insurance Appraisal is an Arbitration in Rhode Island

    Insurance Appraisal is an Arbitration in Rhode Island

    Appraisal Award Must be Rejected if Appraiser Has a Financial Interest in a Potential Award Post 5019 Posted on March…

    4 条评论
  • Lies on Application Voids Policy

    Lies on Application Voids Policy

    An Insurance Company Can Avoid Liability On The Policy By Showing That The Insured Misrepresented A Material Fact Post…

    1 条评论
  • Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

    Duties and Liabilities of Insurance Brokers

    Excellence in Claims Handling This blog post is just a taste of the full article that is only available to subscribers…

  • CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    CGL Policy not a Course of Construction Policy

    Damage Before Project is Complete Excluded by CGL Post 5013 Posted on March 12, 2025 by Barry Zalma Consolidated…

    1 条评论
  • Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Sixteen Years in Prison for Stalking

    Accusing Victim of Insurance Fraud Was Not a Defense to Stalking and Violence Post 5012 Posted on March 11, 2025 by…

  • Policy Enforced as Issued

    Policy Enforced as Issued

    No Duty of Care Exists in Arms-Length Negotiations Between Insurer and Insured Post 5011 Posted on March 10, 2025 by…

    2 条评论
  • Fraud is Epidemic

    Fraud is Epidemic

    Guilty Verdict of Mortgage Fraud Scheme Stands Post 5010 Posted on March 7, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full video at…

    2 条评论
  • Denial of Claim Alone is Not Evidence of Bad Faith

    Denial of Claim Alone is Not Evidence of Bad Faith

    Reliance on Expert Opinion Avoids Claim of Bad Faith Post 5009 Posted on March 6, 2025 by Barry Zalma See the full…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了