Single-Agent Versus Multi-Agent Architectures.
Atul Yadav
Enterprise Cloud and AI Security Architect at Wipro Technologies, London, UK | Client Lloyds Banking Group London (AWS*14, GCP*11, SailPoint IIQ, Cloud IAM, Threat Hunting, Vulnerability Management, Quantum Computing)
Single-Agent architectures have a single AI agent that independently resolves tasks.
When building an agentic system you can build either a single-agent or a multi-agent
architecture. Agentic AI systems use an LLM as the brain of the operation. This LLM has access
to tools. At any given time, the LLM evaluates whether a tool is useful to solve (a part of) the
query. This is referred to as a 'single-agent architecture'.
However, it also sometimes makes sense to initialize multiple agents, each responsible of solving a certain group of tasks. These are called 'multi-agent architectures'. Often, we may still have one agent (LLM) acting as the lead of the whole operation: the main agent.
The choice depends on your use case and how complex the required agent actions are.
Strengths:
multiple less powerful agents.
Weakness:
too many different tool options available.
领英推荐
Note that each agent is equipped with its own memory here. However, you can also have memory for the compositional agentic architecture.
Strengths:
Weakness:
As you can see both, single-agent and multi-agent architectures have both strengths and weaknesses. Single-agent architectures are ideal when the task is straightforward and well-defined and you don’t have specific resource constraints. On the other hand, multi-agent architectures are helpful when the use case is complex and dynamic, requires more specialized knowledge and collaboration, or has scalability and adaptability requirements. For example, Manus AI is built on a multi-agent architecture.